- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
cajunandy
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | New Orleans |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | LSU Fan |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 890 |
| Registered on: | 11/26/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
What ticker symbol are you looking at?
Here is a link to Black Rifle Coffee and it shows a price of $0.90.
Black rifle coffee investor page.Symbol BRCC
Here is a link to Black Rifle Coffee and it shows a price of $0.90.
Black rifle coffee investor page.Symbol BRCC
0
re: Former Virginia Lt. Gov Justin Fairfax kills wife in murder suicide
Posted by cajunandy on 4/16/26 at 8:34 am to SCLibertarian
they were getting a divorce although they were still living in the same house. He had been served with court papers and they had a scheduled court date.
Fox news
Fox news
re: Federal appeals court rejects trans athlete ban in Minnesota
Posted by cajunandy on 4/15/26 at 9:14 pm to imjustafatkid
SCOTUS has already heard arguments on issue of biological boys/trans girls in girls sports. in 24-43 West Virginia v BPJ.
24-43 West Virginia V BPJ
If I remember correctly the trans side did not fair well. still waiting on the decision.
24-43 West Virginia V BPJ
If I remember correctly the trans side did not fair well. still waiting on the decision.
He would have to run for reelection for congress this year. I do not think you can run for both governor and congress at the same time. It also looks like it is to late to enter the congressional race. So it is governor or k street.
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by cajunandy on 4/5/26 at 1:01 am to hawgfaninc
According to Trump, the officer rescued is a highly respected Colonel. Colonel usually command a wing or air group, why would he be flying as the WSO. Also, the CIA was involved in the rescue which also seems unusual. Is it possible this flight with a Colonel and CIA much more than what meets the eye?
Glad all the boys are coming back alive.
Glad all the boys are coming back alive.
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by cajunandy on 3/31/26 at 12:49 pm to omegaman66
quote:
China, no more half price oil deals.
Paid in US dollars, Iran has been accepting the yuan
re: DOJ reaches settlement with Gen. Flynn
Posted by cajunandy on 3/25/26 at 7:50 pm to Night Vision
If Strzok and Page can get a combined $2 million then Flynn should get at least 3-5 times that amount.
quote:
someone made a killing, who do you think it was
Pelosi and Crenshaw?
:dunno:
Barron is like 6 10 might be a tad to tall.
SCOTUS just granted writs on this issue in two cases. They have already scheduled oral arguments for the latter part of April (which is really fast) From my quick review of the briefs these stays will be voided.
SCOTUS order granting writs
SCOTUS order granting writs
quote:
This is exactly what we did in Syria for that regime change.
That's not what "we" did. It's what your heroes Barry Obama and Hillary Clinton did. It is plan stupid to even think that Trump is going to do what those two did.
what a difference an hour makes
quote:
Republicans will be the ones who remove him. You should prepare yourself for that.
He will be "removed" on January 20, 2029 at 12pm at which time he will pass the baton off to another Republican President. Once an honest census is done in 2030 and blue states lose 8-10 seats dimocrates will not see the oval office for another 20 years. Enjoy the wilderness.
:doublebird:
quote:
God Dam double down on the stupidity Patton!
He's not Patton He is Lloyd Fredendall.
this case was argued in front of the Supreme Court on Feb 25, 2026. County had a poor showing.
SCOTUS case number 25-95
SCOTUS case number 25-95
Colion Noir put out a video on this yesterday.
Pretty good one
Pretty good one
re: Rev. Jesse Jackson RIP
Posted by cajunandy on 2/17/26 at 10:29 am to hogcard1964
One of those situations where if you can not say something nice. Also, I like to think that those on the right are better than those on the left in these situations.
Rev. Jesse Jackson RIP
Posted by cajunandy on 2/17/26 at 10:23 am
re: To My MS friends. GOP trying to screw you with House Bill 828
Posted by cajunandy on 1/22/26 at 8:07 am to Wishnitwas1998
quote:
it's the only state in the union where dog hunting is legal.
I guess you don't hunt in Louisiana.
re: Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control Case
Posted by cajunandy on 1/21/26 at 10:27 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Whatcha got for me?
There are actually very few 2nd Amendment rights cases. The first important case was DC v Heller in which DC banned the possession of handguns. Scalia wrote the opinion in which he analyzed the the 2nd amendment and then articulated a two part test in analyzing 2nd amendment cases. !st is whether the 2nd amendment is implicated, then the Constitution protects that behavior and the burden is on the state to show that there exist a history of gun regulation to justify the present regulation. In that Heller only concerned a federal law, the states took the position that it did not apply to the states. McDonald v Chicago rejected this argument.
An issue that has yet to be decided is when looking for historical regulations to support the law have far back do you go. When the 2nd amendment was passed in 1791 it only applied to the federal government Not until the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments were passed did the BIll of rights apply to the States.
So now the issue is how far back do you have to go to find gun regulations that would support modern regulations. For real 2nd Amendment supporters one must look to the 1790's to find supporting analogs. For gun controllers they want to use the period after the Civil war,. Their problem is most if not all of these laws are based on race and are unconstitutional. The gun controllers are so desperate to find some historical support they appear to be willing to overlook that part including Jackson.
re: Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control Case
Posted by cajunandy on 1/21/26 at 9:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's a USSC case Bruen that created a test that involves a historical analysis
Bruen did not creat the test it affirmed the test as provided by DC v Heller.
quote:New York Rifle and Pistol v Bruen.
Under Heller, when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct, and to justify a firearm regulation the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.
In McDonald v Chicago, SCOTUS applied the two part test to the states.
Popular
27
