- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
LSUTANGERINE
| Favorite team: | Southern Cal  |
| Location: | Baton Rouge and Northshore LA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 38163 |
| Registered on: | 9/19/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: When you were growing up how did your family refer to meals.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:54 pm to The Torch
Breakfast. Lunch. Supper. Sometimes dinner. But mostly supper.
0
re: Ridiculous Prescription Prices - Zepbound $3,910.00
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:50 pm to TheOcean
quote:
Order overseas. Problem solved
They’re cracking down on this big time. I did this to get a cheaper med and it was confiscated at the border. I received two letter letters from the feds. The first one scared the living shite out of me. One was to tell me it was confiscated in the documents I needed to provide if I wanted to appeal. That letter also said it would be destroyed after 30 days I believe. The second letter stated that it was destroyed. The medicine has to be unavailable here or it has to be a continuation of treatment from overseas. And you have to provide documentation.
If it’s under a certain amount of dollars, they’re basically just going to destroy it with no repercussions. At least for your first offense. I don’t know what mine was, but it was definitely under $100.
re: Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:26 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
Now, if the feds return them, they’ll be indian givers.
:lol:
Winner
re: Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:20 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Updated:
LINK
quote:
Star Comes Out said his earlier statement had been “misinterpreted” and that there was no such demand from federal officials. He said the tribe had been in “cooperative communications” with federal officials about the issue and that federal officials had said that “one option for the Tribe to have easier access to information is to enter into an immigration agreement” with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and DHS. He did not specify what type of agreement.
He also said the tribe was “working with Tribal, State, and Federal officials to verify” reports that tribal members living in Minneapolis were arrested by ICE. Earlier in the week he said he had been “made aware that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained four Oglala Sioux tribal members in Minneapolis” and that the tribe had their first names. He called the arrests “a treaty violation.”
LINK
re: Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:16 pm to Knight of Old
PJ Media is generally classified as a right-wing, conservative commentary and news website, rather than a neutral or objective news outlet. It is owned by the Salem Media Group, which specializes in conservative content.
Here is a breakdown of its characteristics:
Political Bias: The site is heavily conservative and produces opinion-driven, rather than objective, reporting.
Reliability & Accuracy: According to data from Ad Fontes Media, PJ Media has a low reliability score, with content often characterized by sensationalized headlines and, at times, inaccurate or unverified information.
Here is a breakdown of its characteristics:
Political Bias: The site is heavily conservative and produces opinion-driven, rather than objective, reporting.
Reliability & Accuracy: According to data from Ad Fontes Media, PJ Media has a low reliability score, with content often characterized by sensationalized headlines and, at times, inaccurate or unverified information.
re: Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:09 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Why are they in a homeless camp.in Minnesota when the tribe is in S Dakota?
Doesn’t matter
re: Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 9:08 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
So a squad of Indians leaves their tribal land and participate in attacks on federal forces?
Not sure where you get that.
All of the new stories said they were picked up at a homeless encampment
Oglala Sioux Tribe says three tribal members arrested in Minneapolis are in ICE detention
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:58 pm
And homeland security is not giving much info
LINK
As previously stated multiple times, I wholeheartedly support the legal deportation of illegal immigrants. I do not, however, support the detainment or deportation of American citizens.
Updated:
LINK
quote:
The president of Oglala Sioux Tribe in South Dakota on Tuesday called for the immediate release of tribal members who were detained at a homeless encampment by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minnesota last week.
Three of the four Oglala Sioux Tribe members who were arrested in Minneapolis on Friday have been transferred to an ICE facility at Fort Snelling, President Frank Star Comes Out said in a statement released with a memorandum sent to federal immigration authorities.
“The Oglala Sioux Tribe’s memorandum makes clear that ‘tribal citizens are not aliens’ and are ‘categorically outside immigration jurisdiction,’” Star Comes Out said. “Enrolled tribal members are citizens of the United States by statute and citizens of the Oglala Sioux Nation by treaty.” Details about the circumstances that led to their detention were unclear.
quote:
Last year, elected leaders in the Navajo Nation said that tribal citizens in Arizona and New Mexico reported being stopped and detained by ICE officers. In November, a member of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community in Arizona who had been arrested in Iowa was mistakenly scheduled to be deported before the error was caught and she was released.
quote:
In the memorandum sent to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Star Comes Out said the when tribal nation reached out to the agency it was provided with only the first names of the men. Homeland Security refused to release more information, unless the tribe “entered into an immigration agreement with ICE.”
LINK
As previously stated multiple times, I wholeheartedly support the legal deportation of illegal immigrants. I do not, however, support the detainment or deportation of American citizens.
Updated:
quote:
Star Comes Out said his earlier statement had been “misinterpreted” and that there was no such demand from federal officials. He said the tribe had been in “cooperative communications” with federal officials about the issue and that federal officials had said that “one option for the Tribe to have easier access to information is to enter into an immigration agreement” with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and DHS. He did not specify what type of agreement.
He also said the tribe was “working with Tribal, State, and Federal officials to verify” reports that tribal members living in Minneapolis were arrested by ICE. Earlier in the week he said he had been “made aware that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained four Oglala Sioux tribal members in Minneapolis” and that the tribe had their first names. He called the arrests “a treaty violation.”
LINK
re: Trump now has a Nobel Peace Prize
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:07 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Trump has been begging for this
I think he’s the only person who has ever publicly called for the Nobel peace prize to be presented to himself
re: Trump now has a Nobel Peace Prize
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 2:01 pm to hawgfaninc
This is like letting your little brother hold a remote control while you are playing call of duty or Roblox
re: Shattered my calcaneus today. AMA
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 1:57 pm to grizzlylongcut
re: Stephen Miller: In ten days, justice will be restored. Fully and absolutely.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 10:56 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Didn't they say 10 days on January 10th? So on January 20th all **** is going to hit the fan.
That’s the same day credit card rates are going down to 10%. So it’s a two for one day. USA will be lit on J20
:nana: :drunkards: :jump2:
re: Drunk! But in your own self driving car?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 10:49 am to dewster
quote:
I'm sure most states haven't updated their laws for this. The Cadillacs, GMCs, and Denalis with the Super Cruise system will not operate if someone isn't in the driver's seat. It periodically checks that the person in that seat is awake (I think it is smart enough to recognize if a person's eyes are closed, if they are using their seatbelt, and checks every couple of minutes for them being awake). Technically I think it could handle most routes, but the lawyers at that company have clearly influenced the programming and hardware decisions. I think Tesla's system works in a similar way but is more ballsy from a legal standpoint. 'm sure that it could handle a long distance with no driver at all if allowed. May run into trouble with curb cuts, alleys, or driveways but so would a sober teenaged girl. Even in most Teslas, I think the car also knows if someone is in the operator's seat and if they are alert. And there's always the risk that a cop sees a "driver" passed out in the passenger seat, but how do they pull the darn thing over? Now Waymo is a different story. Zoox would be too if they ever figured out how to make the tech work. Those vehicles are for hire, and drunk college kids and tourists in places like Vegas are a big part of their future market. Here is an example of a 2021 Cadillac that has an optics feature built into the steering wheel. Notice the green light at the top of the steering wheel to indicate that the system is active. The tiny black monitor device below it, right above the air bag is what periodically scans the driver being awake and not asleep or having a newspaper in front of their face - it can detect the heat signature of a person, and it can't be tricked easily with an Airplane! style blow up doll. Supposedly it can see through polarized sunglasses too. I could be wrong because this tech is moving so damn fast right now. I'm fairly certain that Tesla has a similar driver monitor system, but IMO it's a bit cleaner looking and less "lawyer engineered" than the Cadillac system. I also think that Cadillac/GMC advertise what their system can do very clearly while Tesla tends to under sell the full capabilities once they become available (meaning the Teslas can do a little more than what is advertised), and Teslas seem to be updated more regularly. I do think we are at a point right now where these systems likely could technically drive people to and from most addresses without any input though. There are legal and regulatory hurdles that would have to change for that full self driving tech to be available for use without any operator in private motor vehicles. I'm sure that we will see these hurdles removed in many places within the next couple of years in some states though. I think Tesla is the leader right now, with GM being second best. GM has a slightly smoother approach with the lidar mapping and onboard systems working together (slightly better hardware platform), but they limit themselves to use on highways and major roads, state routes, etc. and not secondary streets. Telsa will just roll on any public road which is fricking awesome and ballsy IMO. You could have your Tesla drive down a residential street and watch it dodge parked cars and stray dogs. Once you pull onto a residential street, the Cadillac will start warning and buzzing you to put your hands on the wheel at that point and to find your own damn driveway. BMW, Hyundai, and Ford are not far behind GMC/Cadillac. Which makes sense considering they are massive companies with a huge R&D budget. I think the smaller companies like Mazda or Nissan are investing in this space but aren't as polished as the other options yet. I have no idea what Lucid and Rivian are doing. I really don't follow them very much except one of my neighbors has a Lucid. It's a sweet looking car. I guess my age will show with this. I'm not sure if I'd trust any system to drive me home completely without at least passively monitoring it in places like south Louisiana (with so many shitty roads/bridges, faded pavement markings, road debris, and bodies of water to drive into) or Pittsburgh (with cliffs and equally shitty roads/bridges). What I'd like to see is for heavy trucks to be outfitted with tech like Tesla's autopilot or GM's Super Cruise. Then we slowly phase in extended driving hours for freight haulers that are using these automated cruise systems, since it will reduce fatigue and improve their driving performance even when they are tired or frustrated with traffic.
This is the dissertation I was looking for. PhD in self driving cars awarded. :cheers:
re: Drunk! But in your own self driving car?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:29 am to billjamin
quote:
Same result. It’s looking for an awake and engaged driver in the driver seat. It can track your eye movement, head direction, mouth movement, etc. it’ll know pretty quick. You used to be able to fool the steering wheel sensor with a weight but that doesn’t work with the camera AI now.
Even in the backseat? Well then what’s the use of a driverless car? Who’s it going to drive?
re: Drunk! But in your own self driving car?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:28 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Yes. States are already passing or crafting laws regarding this. You have to be able to drive.
That doesn’t seem fair.
As long as the person is not driving and maybe in the backseat. What’s the difference in taking one of those driverless taxis?
re: Drunk! But in your own self driving car?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:26 am to billjamin
quote:
You used to be able to do that but not anymore. That driver monitoring is too good. It would just pull over.
Did not know that. Let’s say backseat.
Drunk! But in your own self driving car?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:21 am
Just watched the video in the other thread about that drinking faculty member who said she was fine to drive because she’s in a Tesla. Like that makes a difference :lol:
Got me to thinking. What would happen if someone was obviously drunk and, not only in their own self driving car, but in the back seat. And the car gets in a wreck or gets pulled over for whatever reason. With the police have a case for DUI?
Or even if they were in the driver seat and put it in self driving mode and were just sleeping.
Got me to thinking. What would happen if someone was obviously drunk and, not only in their own self driving car, but in the back seat. And the car gets in a wreck or gets pulled over for whatever reason. With the police have a case for DUI?
Or even if they were in the driver seat and put it in self driving mode and were just sleeping.
Couple lock teens in pen. Shoot them with BB gun. Refused to feed them. Have ‘fight night’
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:14 am
quote:
According to the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Hayford and Menees are accused of locking a 13-year-old and a 14-year-old in a chicken pen and using BB guns to shoot at them.
quote:
Charging documents stated the couple gave the children drugs and alcohol and refused to feed or house them. The reported abuse took place between January 2023 and December 2025.
The sheriff’s office said that evidence suggested a pattern of ongoing abuse, including the couple holding organized “fight nights” at a child’s birthday party, where the children were forced to fight one another. Charges against Hayford and Menees include kidnapping, endangering the welfare of a child, abuse or neglect of a child and domestic assault.
LINK
re: Dutchtown High - Lockdown
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:10 am to Lsukinesalum2001
quote:
The kid that saw it in the bathroom called his mother and his mother called the school. My son is also a freshman there. My son’s friend was in the class when they came in and arrested the kid. The kid was a football player and a pretty good one. He had the loaded gun on him.
If he was in the bathroom and called his mother and she said I’m calling the school right now, then that seems appropriate.
But I don’t think we know that he did not leave the bathroom and also alert a school official.
re: Is it legal for local law enforcement
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:07 am to Tigertittie
quote:
To arrest federal agents? When those said agents are enforcing the law?
Only if they are breaking the law.
re: Trump presented with Nobel peace prize by winner
Posted by LSUTANGERINE on 1/16/26 at 8:05 am to Timeoday
quote:
Nobel Prize winners to weep and thrash in jealous anger.
I believe there the only people thrashing with jealous anger about this year’s award were Trump and his administration
Popular
8
