tigerbaitlawyer

-1

re: Frank Wilson sighting

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 1/2/26 at 7:05 am to The Boat

Absolutely agree!!!

Tiger Rant

re: The Lincoln Riley to Florida story was interesting.

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 11/29/25 at 5:37 pm to Cell of Awareness

Funny how no one is playing his game this time. He burned many bridges with his stunt last time around.

re: LIGHTS ON THE TD LOGO

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 11/29/25 at 4:42 pm to tigergirl26

I remember that vividly!

re: LIGHTS ON THE TD LOGO

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 11/29/25 at 4:35 pm to BigWinnie

I am not saying anything since Lincoln Riley played us last time.

re: Tim Temple- Louisiana Insurance Commissioner - Deep Thoughts

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 10/1/23 at 3:26 pm to Riverside

Your rates are high because of predatory plaintiff attorneys.

BS

-6

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/11/23 at 9:30 pm to Lou Pai

In the United States, the judicial system is supposed to be separate and independent from politics. This means that judges and courts make decisions based on the law and the evidence presented in court, rather than being influenced by political pressure or partisan interests.

The reason for this separation is to ensure that the judiciary can provide fair and impartial decisions that are not influenced by political considerations. This helps to uphold the rule of law and maintain the balance of power between the three branches of government - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

The separation of powers is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government, enshrined in the Constitution. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. By keeping the judiciary independent from politics, the Constitution ensures that the interpretation of the law is based solely on the facts and the law itself, rather than on political considerations.

In this way, the U.S. judicial system is designed to provide a check and balance on the power of the other branches of government, to prevent abuses of power and to protect the rights of citizens.

-1

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 4:54 pm to BBONDS25

If found not guilty by a jury to which Perry was found guilty of murder by a jury!

-14

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 4:20 pm to POTUS2024

Y’all are the ones blaming the victim. Sounds like you are referring to yourself.

-16

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 4:00 pm to JayDeerTay84

Except for the murder!

-12

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:58 pm to JayDeerTay84

Where was the violence when the murder occurred? Only showed a group of people walking down the street.

-13

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:54 pm to JayDeerTay84

Were they rioting or walking down the street?

-9

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:51 pm to thebigmuffaletta

quote:
How is pointing out the law “planning” something?

Did you keep reading?

“Holcomb, who was called to the stand Wednesday afternoon, seemed to try to talk Perry down. "Aren't you a CDL holder too?" he asked, referring to the men's licenses to carry concealed handguns. "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot."

The dude did exactly want he told his friend! Seems premeditated.

-3

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:48 pm to the808bass

I don’t give a shite about either party or what happens going further. I care about the extreme partisanship (on both sides) of outcome determinative results.

I am supporting the rule of law. In our society a dispute of facts are determined by a jury. Perry was given a fair jury trial and was convicted.

-2

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:35 pm to JayDeerTay84

So you endorse vigilantism?

-1

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:34 pm to Bestbank Tiger

I would say the same thing regardless of the victim or defendant. The facts are the facts regardless of party.

-2

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:25 pm to Flats

Seems like Perry was trying to plan this.

“Perry speculated about how he might get away with such a killing – by claiming self-defense, as he is now doing. Prosecutors presented a Facebook Messenger chat between Perry and a friend, Michael Holcomb, which occurred two weeks before he shot Foster. In it, Perry argued that shooting protesters was legal if it was in self-defense. Holcomb, who was called to the stand Wednesday afternoon, seemed to try to talk Perry down. "Aren't you a CDL holder too?" he asked, referring to the men's licenses to carry concealed handguns. "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot." “

Seems like he wanted to create a situation and then claim to be a victim.

-4

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 3:03 pm to thebigmuffaletta

The testimony confirming Perry's anger toward protesters came on the third day of the trial as prosecutors displayed text messages and social media comments showing that he thought about killing them. "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," Perry wrote to a friend in June of 2020. "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters," he wrote on another occasion. Perry also encouraged violence in a variety of social media posts.

In addition, Perry speculated about how he might get away with such a killing – by claiming self-defense, as he is now doing. Prosecutors presented a Facebook Messenger chat between Perry and a friend, Michael Holcomb, which occurred two weeks before he shot Foster. In it, Perry argued that shooting protesters was legal if it was in self-defense. Holcomb, who was called to the stand Wednesday afternoon, seemed to try to talk Perry down. "Aren't you a CDL holder too?" he asked, referring to the men's licenses to carry concealed handguns. "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot."

This claim – that Foster raised the barrel of his AK-47 – is, of course, Perry's principal hope to escape a murder conviction. It was refuted over and over during the first three days of the trial by witnesses who were near Foster that night. All repeated a version of the same story: They heard squealing tires as a car sped into a group of about 20 protesters. The protesters, some of whom had almost been hit by the car, slapped and kicked it. Garrett Foster strode to the car's side and issued an order to the driver. All of the witnesses insisted that Foster did not raise the barrel of his gun. According to the D.A.'s lead prosecutor, Guillermo Gonzalez, his gun was recovered with the safety still on and no bullet in the chamber

re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry

Posted by tigerbaitlawyer on 4/9/23 at 2:23 pm to thebigmuffaletta

quote:
You mean like charging people with murder when they clearly acted in self-defense? We’ve seen the left continuously engage in malicious prosecution of people who exercise their right of self-defense.

The facts of the case were not obvious which is why it went to a jury.

The self defense saying “Rather be Judged by 12 than carried by 6.” Sometimes the 12 that judge you, do not believe you were justified in your actions and you have a consequence. Just because you assert self-defense does not mean it was self defense.

After hearing the entire case, the jury believed he did not act in self defense.

While you do not have a duty to retreat, You cannot claim self defense for a situation you created or you intended to create.