- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
LSUminati
| Favorite team: | Yale  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4081 |
| Registered on: | 1/21/2017 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Sounds like there are different interpretations of whether a buyout is paid.
Maybe we should just let him unenroll and enroll at LSU and tell Ole Miss to sue - make our day.
Maybe we should just let him unenroll and enroll at LSU and tell Ole Miss to sue - make our day.
1
re: We all are aware LSU is not Kiffins dream job/destination
Posted by LSUminati on 1/16/26 at 1:19 pm to Captain Rumbeard
I agree with you. I just think the only “threat” would be Texas if they want him bad enough.
Haha this guy is a bama fan. He can’t stand Alabama not being the center of attention.
Alabama is Nebraska of this era. No billionaires and they can’t utilize a split state government to grease NIL coffers :pimp:
Back of the bus Gumps!
Alabama is Nebraska of this era. No billionaires and they can’t utilize a split state government to grease NIL coffers :pimp:
Back of the bus Gumps!
re: We all are aware LSU is not Kiffins dream job/destination
Posted by LSUminati on 1/16/26 at 1:13 pm to partsman103
He’d only leave for Texas or the NFL and those are still question marks
But this is stage 2 cope quicker than I thought
First “he isn’t anything special!”
Now “well he’s gonna leave!”
But this is stage 2 cope quicker than I thought
First “he isn’t anything special!”
Now “well he’s gonna leave!”
re: If BK and AT spent $18m last year
Posted by LSUminati on 1/14/26 at 1:21 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
It’s because we are the only school in the state to compete with. Can leverage the whole power of the state economy to incentivize donations to NIL. It’s actually why Lane came here.
I am with you. I read those tea leaves when he was hired. It's a powerful tool for sure.
re: If BK and AT spent $18m last year
Posted by LSUminati on 1/14/26 at 1:16 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
Oil and gas money baw. When the governor gets his lobby behind LSU football and the legislature gets on board with tax incentives, the big boy oil and gas don’t mind funding a roster for 40 mil every year.
This is LSU's advantage as the only P5 school in this era. Maybe even more of an advantage than pre NIL, who would've thought?
I'd also add, people donate when they have something they believe in. BK wasn't inspiring in any way.
quote:
First off love how Lane retweets the up and coming media guys.
Agreed. Good guy behavior.
Plenty of old school bagmen but they lack the billionaires
I think there's an angle to play here that keeps him in play, but the odds are a bit longer.
Sell first team reps in the spring and who knows what happens with Leavitt's injury history. LSU's QB room is as open as any in the country if you want to be at a major program.
Sell first team reps in the spring and who knows what happens with Leavitt's injury history. LSU's QB room is as open as any in the country if you want to be at a major program.
re: Philly appreciation thread
Posted by LSUminati on 1/12/26 at 10:41 am to UnluckyTiger
Your :pimp: emojis are all I need my brother :cheers:
If Philly just posted in the manner of Unlucky, he would probably have just as much if not more credibility.
re: It’s honestly impressive how bad Scott Woodward was
Posted by LSUminati on 1/10/26 at 2:37 pm to ColtTiger247
Some people are really good at procedural and administrative aspects of a job (by the book so to speak), but have bad instincts. This is how I would describe Woodward.
quote:
Why? 4 & 5 yr platers that have been developed within a solid system & culture.
While your overall point is accurate, I believe this is false. The majority of their roster is from the portal.
re: I see a lot of people complaining about the WR portal signings but..
Posted by LSUminati on 1/9/26 at 1:53 pm to Bsnightlife
Also teams get 105 roster spots (scholarships). Might as well use them.
re: Demond didn’t have the chest
Posted by LSUminati on 1/8/26 at 7:10 pm to ColtTiger247
I agree. The noise and vitriol probably scared the kid off. His agent dumped him he had to feel pretty isolated. He could’ve gotten out if he wanted with some damages paid on his behalf but he probably didn’t want the smoke.
re: Ole miss scores 38 tonight……
Posted by LSUminati on 1/8/26 at 5:06 pm to crownNbull
Miami can score, don't just assume they can't because you watched them play against the best defense in the country all year and a tough game on the road against the aggies.
quote:
Remedy: Pay back that money and court costs
So we agree! Well maybe not about the court costs - financial damages are likely (assuming no loophole is utilized)
But I will help you out a bit since you and everyone's primary concern is actually preventing LSU getting a badass QB, using feigned outrage as your vessel . . . the best avenue for that is potential tampering allegations if the NCAA wants to enforce. That could help you all realize your goal :cheers:
You know what they say about stones and glass houses though
quote:
A 4 million dollar contract being unenforceable is absurd. Cant wait until you're wrong.
Again, one more time for those in the back, the question is not limited to enforceability. The question is one of REMEDY. Not even addressing the errors in the language and potential loopholes...
quote:
And you would lose your arse
No, I don't think I would. These cute little rev share agreements are a fun little break from what I do. Carry on.
Again, you can have provisions in an agreement that say anything, that doesn't 1. make it enforceable; 2. mean the counterparty cannot breach. The question is what remedy is appropriate and available? Damages is the answer. And I would take my chances with the BIG10 lawyers.
quote:
If he is unable to abide by the contract because of his occupation then Washington should not be bound by law to hold their end of the deal.
So many people out there don't understand contracts and law. Understandable.
Popular
8
