- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
GoblinGuide
| Favorite team: | South Carolina  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2016 |
| Registered on: | 11/22/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Some admirals seem less than thrilled about the new battleships - slow motion mutiny
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/13/26 at 5:23 pm to cascadia
quote:
Personally I can’t see the purpose of a battleship in today’s warfare but then I guess it depends what they decide to outfit onto it and if they’ve got good ideas for that then sure
I'm convinced these are a new generation of frigate or cruiser and someone told Trump they were battleships because that's what he'd understand.
2
re: The State Department has now revoked more than 100,000 visas
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/12/26 at 11:07 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Will only be 10% APR as well!
I'll believe that part when I see it.
re: Explain the “Judge blocks Trump on…” thing
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/12/26 at 9:08 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I often find myself casually scrolling past a TV at the gym or a newspaper heading at grocery, or opening up a web browser at work and see the headlines or some chyron stating “Federal Judge blocks Trump on X, Y, Z”
It’s almost constant. Yet I don’t recall one single federal judge so much as slowing Biden’s administration down one bit.
So how do these left wing judges in random jurisdictions always end up getting to make an injunction on a policy from the Trump administration. Could another random judge somewhere simply over rule that judge’s ruling?
This process seems incredibly confusing and quite frankly, an actual attack on democracy if I’ve ever seen one.
The Trump administration is a big believer in the Unitary Executive Theory which places a bigger emphasis on governing via the Office of the President than previous administration. As a natural result, Trump is going to assert authority in areas that the President typically had not previously. And in response courts are going to check some of those actions if there's no precedence for them and let it get appealed to the Supreme Court to get a ruling.
I am curious why you feel like this is an attack on Democracy?
re: Trump caps credit card interest at 10%
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/10/26 at 7:26 am to Kjnstkmn
The Congressional battle to try and pass this is going to be hilarious.
re: Trump says we should increase defense spending by 50%
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/8/26 at 6:29 am to Eurocat
It's wild how we can find (borrow) an extra half trillion dollars out of the blue and the debt hawks on this board be ok with it.
re: I was wrong
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/3/26 at 11:45 am to TigersHuskers
quote:
Doing this is great. Especially if no Americans get hurt and we get their oil
Exactly. We took Afghanistan and Iraq with virtually no losses. Both affairs went flawlessly.
re: Massie Melting
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/3/26 at 11:31 am to Jugbow
He's from that Libertarian school that sticks foreign affairs in a back closet somewhere to be forgotten about. He's consistent if nothing else.
re: Holy Cats. Venezuela as a new territory.
Posted by GoblinGuide on 1/3/26 at 11:22 am to Root_User
quote:
The US will run the country until it is transitioned after an election can be held safely.
I wonder how much that's going to cost us by the end?
re: Now that mUh Epstein has fizzled out
Posted by GoblinGuide on 12/21/25 at 11:13 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
What hoax will the TDS crowd manufacture next?
The speed that about half this board stopped caring about the Epstein files is honestly impressive.
re: I'm pretty amazed at this polling.
Posted by GoblinGuide on 12/15/25 at 2:13 pm to OU Guy
quote:
Trump is always under polled so add on at least 3-7% to his numbers
How would one determine that? From a technical standpoint I mean?
re: U.S. Debt around $39 Trillion, how about stopping Foreign Aid ?
Posted by GoblinGuide on 12/12/25 at 6:29 pm to bluedragon
quote:
bluedragon
BS….
The debt the damned Democrats wanted to add with zero results.
The Democrats hold no power in government right now. They have no majority in Congress or the Supreme Court, no Democrat is president. You'll have to find a different scapegoat when nothing gets better.
re: U.S. Debt around $39 Trillion, how about stopping Foreign Aid ?
Posted by GoblinGuide on 12/12/25 at 2:18 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Or the $9 trillion Biden added
Sounds like it's a good thing Biden isn't in office then. What happened to all those Republicans who cried about the national debt while he was in office though? Did they all lose their voices suddenly?
re: U.S. Debt around $39 Trillion, how about stopping Foreign Aid ?
Posted by GoblinGuide on 12/12/25 at 2:11 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
That 70 billion would barely even make a dent in the 2.3 trillion that Trump nd the Republicans added to the debt just this year.
re: FBI Dir Kash Patel announces Russia Hoax files found in burn bags will be made public
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/30/25 at 8:18 am to cajunangelle
Are they going to sit on Bondi's desk for a few months then be called inexistant as well?
re: Stephen Miller: "The only process invaders are due is deportation."
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 5:04 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
If Stephen Miller hadn't found his way into politics, he'd probably would've been a prolific serial killer.
re: Hegseth explains why “unlawful order” means something different inside the military
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 5:00 pm to riccoar
quote:
And you believe men can become women
Less that and more that it's not my goddamned business what other people do.
re: Hegseth explains why “unlawful order” means something different inside the military
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 1:32 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You don’t know that.
But I’m glad you’ve admitted we can analyze intent. Which was clear. Yet you support it. Pathetic.
I've watched Republicans do the same and more most of my adult life. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
re: Hegseth explains why “unlawful order” means something different inside the military
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 1:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You didn’t answer my question. Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement of just an obvious one?
Or are you saying we are allowed to infer intent?
You can infer just fine. It won't hold up in a court martial or a court of law however.
re: Hegseth explains why “unlawful order” means something different inside the military
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 1:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Is “sedition is punishable by death” a problem statement or just a very obvious one?
Is telling soldier's to disobey illegal orders seditious in some way?
re: You may not be interested in Dar al-Harb, the conquest of Dar al-Harb is interested in you
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 1:02 pm to Narax
quote:
Geopolitics with no holds barred.
So we're back to being the world's police again?
re: Hegseth explains why “unlawful order” means something different inside the military
Posted by GoblinGuide on 11/27/25 at 12:55 pm to Jbird
quote:
Aw so they are simply trolls
No wonder six Dems jumped at the chance.
And the worst part is it's so obvious to you and me but somehow not to Hegseth, Trump, and Co.
Popular
8
