- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
senshado
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | Muay Thai, Karate |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 36 |
| Registered on: | 8/26/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
Impressed my Muay Thai coach with my combos at practice.
0
In this case, it seems like the guy goes out of his way unnecessarily pass in front of the OP. It's kinda like when there's a wall full of 10 empty urinals, and that 1 guy has to use the one right next to you!
I used to have a "gymesis" at my old gym. No matter what day or what muscle group I was training, he always seemed to need the same machine, station, or weights that I was using. I would even test him by switching to muscle groups that I wasn't training ( for example, I train back and triceps together EVERY TIME, so I'd switch it up and do a set of curls just to see if he would follow, and he did- every time!!). He always seemed to be purposely following me and occupying whatever I needed to use.
So I don't think the OP is the a-hole. I think the weird guy that inserts himself in the OP's personal space without needing to is the a-hole, much like my old gymesis.
I used to have a "gymesis" at my old gym. No matter what day or what muscle group I was training, he always seemed to need the same machine, station, or weights that I was using. I would even test him by switching to muscle groups that I wasn't training ( for example, I train back and triceps together EVERY TIME, so I'd switch it up and do a set of curls just to see if he would follow, and he did- every time!!). He always seemed to be purposely following me and occupying whatever I needed to use.
So I don't think the OP is the a-hole. I think the weird guy that inserts himself in the OP's personal space without needing to is the a-hole, much like my old gymesis.
re: Wading through the court transcripts from the book keeping error trial
Posted by senshado on 6/3/24 at 1:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Pretty sure he testified about schemes- schemes to steal from Trump to reimburse for a bonus he didn't like, which he admitted on the stand. Even called it a "scheme". I'm pretty sure Trump wouldn't be in on a scheme to steal from himself.
re: PT Atty's - deep dive into the "4 of you think it's A, 4 think it's B and 4 think it's C"
Posted by senshado on 5/31/24 at 2:26 pm to Willie Stroker
The same guy that said he used to bury stories for Trump far before he publicly ran for President?
So the jury put more weight into a convicted perjor's testimony (who got caught lying on the stand) and a tabloid journalist saying that Trump tried to influence the election than it did in Hope Hick's testimony saying that he was trying to protect his family. And the weight was a result of the judge's extreme bias and disregard for constitutional rights. He illegally donated to Biden, his daughter made millions from Trump's political opponents, and he made a mockery of the justice system.
So the jury put more weight into a convicted perjor's testimony (who got caught lying on the stand) and a tabloid journalist saying that Trump tried to influence the election than it did in Hope Hick's testimony saying that he was trying to protect his family. And the weight was a result of the judge's extreme bias and disregard for constitutional rights. He illegally donated to Biden, his daughter made millions from Trump's political opponents, and he made a mockery of the justice system.
So it was by the book to "randomly" select a judge that donated to Trump's political opponent (illegally)? By the book to have a judge whose daughter received millions from Trump's political enemies? By the book to have a convicted serial perjur as the star witness lie on the stand? By the book to disallow pertinent evidence (Stormy's signed denial of the affair) and witnesses (election law expert)? By the book to not allow the jury instructions to be available to the jury in writing?
Nah. I really wish leftist would just finally admit that they don't care about the law, rules, process, etc.. They only care about getting their way.
Nah. I really wish leftist would just finally admit that they don't care about the law, rules, process, etc.. They only care about getting their way.
It's always a slam dunk case when the outcome is predetermined and the process is unfairly tilted against one party!
However, had a non biased judge been selected which allowed for all witnesses and evidence that should have been allowed (Stormy's signed denial of the affair, the election law expert, etc), and had the judge presided in an impartial manner, the case was clearly never gonna be tried.
However, had a non biased judge been selected which allowed for all witnesses and evidence that should have been allowed (Stormy's signed denial of the affair, the election law expert, etc), and had the judge presided in an impartial manner, the case was clearly never gonna be tried.
re: For our board libs, does this trial verdict renew your faith in the justice system?
Posted by senshado on 5/31/24 at 12:50 pm to saintslsupels
So how can we take your statement seriously when you express joy at "Eric crying on Hannity" about it? The fact that you're happy that Eric is "crying" shows extreme bias against Trump, and therefore, you can't answer the question objectively.
Witnesses- a porn star that tried to extort the defendant, who actually admitted multiple times that she didn't sleep with him, including in writing- which the "totally impartial judge" refused to allow as evidence, and someone that went to prison for lying that literally got caught lying on the stand in this very case.
Paper trail- checks with "retainer" on them showing that he signed checks presented to him as legal expenses to his lawyer that were listed as legal expenses that his accountants labeled as legal expenses. See a pattern there?
Friends like Pecker "nailing" him- well, scholars like Turley believe that Pecker helped Trump with his testimony. The fact is that this case was 100% policitcal, Trumps consitutional rights were violated, and leftists don't care about the facts. They just want their will to be done, no matter what the cost. But since you are a fan of people crying, it brings joy to me to see leftists, when they get a taste of their own tactics, literally crying and screaming at the sky.
Witnesses- a porn star that tried to extort the defendant, who actually admitted multiple times that she didn't sleep with him, including in writing- which the "totally impartial judge" refused to allow as evidence, and someone that went to prison for lying that literally got caught lying on the stand in this very case.
Paper trail- checks with "retainer" on them showing that he signed checks presented to him as legal expenses to his lawyer that were listed as legal expenses that his accountants labeled as legal expenses. See a pattern there?
Friends like Pecker "nailing" him- well, scholars like Turley believe that Pecker helped Trump with his testimony. The fact is that this case was 100% policitcal, Trumps consitutional rights were violated, and leftists don't care about the facts. They just want their will to be done, no matter what the cost. But since you are a fan of people crying, it brings joy to me to see leftists, when they get a taste of their own tactics, literally crying and screaming at the sky.
re: Jose Chavez y Chavez
Posted by senshado on 7/7/23 at 8:24 am to MrFreakinMiyagi
I watched both YG movies in the theaters as a teen, and I've loved them since then. In the early 2000's after probably a thousandth rewatch, I started researching the true story of Billy the Kid and realized that YG was a very loosely based true story. The real stories of the events in the YG movies would make for awesome film if done right. Last night while watching YG 1, I told my wife how they gave the wrong deaths to the wrong characters (like Bowdre dying at the McSween house, which was really a 5 day battle) and Doc dying at Stinking Springs in YG 2 (it was actually Bowdre). Those movies got me obsessed with the old west, and I agree that Chavez would be a good character to explore. He was also a pretty big badass in real life.
re: Club 4 Fitness
Posted by senshado on 7/6/23 at 1:32 pm to Homey the Clown
I concur! And the "I need to set up my tripod in the middle of the walkway to record my lift for Instagram" guys. Makes me want to do bodily harm to people.
re: Louisiana HB131 - Constitutional Carry
Posted by senshado on 6/6/23 at 1:47 pm to LazloHollyfeld
My rep. just replied to my email. Apparently, the senate added 2 bad amendments as a requirement to get the votes, so the bill's author deferred it. They basically "killed it with amendments" is how she worded it. She said it will be back on the agenda in 2024.
Interesting take. I have a question then. Would you still stand by this if the classes and permits were free? Because about 100% of the "range officers and firearms instructors" that I argue this topic with have a monetary benefit in REQUIRING the classes they teach. Now, would you still be in favor of this if you had to provide these classes without getting paid for them?
re: Seriously. Are PSA Daggers good pistols?
Posted by senshado on 3/28/23 at 8:03 am to Pandy Fackler
I recently bought a frame with a Viridian laser for $99.00 with free shipping and ordered a sniper green slide. Put it together this weekend and shot it. Like butter! Barely any recoil. Ate everything with no malfunctions. And it's comfortable to shoot. I love it.
Pros- decent marksman, above average in blood tracking, strong and in decent shape (can drag a deer effectively)
Cons- horrible wing shot, not very patient
Cons- horrible wing shot, not very patient
The reason they hold the funds is to prevent transaction losses. It can take up to 7 business days for a check to clear from another institution, and I've seen checks that had a 9 day hold placed on them get returned. If the hold would have dropped earlier, the customer would have spent the funds, and when the check would be returned, the customer's account would be overdrawn.
This summer, we visited Covington, GA (because my daughter is obsessed with the Vampire Diaries!) and while talking to a shop owner there, she told me that right behind her shop is the street that Burt landed the airplane in to go to the store to pick up a six pack!
And the corner of the square is where Gary Bertier got sideswiped in Remember the Titans.
And the corner of the square is where Gary Bertier got sideswiped in Remember the Titans.
re: Hunting over corn or other bait; where’s the satisfaction?
Posted by senshado on 11/30/20 at 8:35 am to Eli Goldfinger
Why? That seems so unfair. Using a projectile weapon makes it too easy. Why not a spear like a real man? Or why not just a knife? Nah. Both have sharpened blades. You should hunt with your hands. That's the ultimate thrill and the only fair way. Don't you think?
I just bought a Hi Point 995 TS (And fricken' love it!!), and it seems to add about 200 to 300 FPS. I would assume the Keltec would be around the same.
I second this. Easier than washing your car, and it has lasted for months on my 3 vehicles.
I actually wouldn't be opposed to limiting them to gun season, honestly. Leave the "true" archers a few weeks to be in the woods before all the wusses with guns start putting pressure on the deer.
I totally agree about Muzzleloaders. The "primitive caliber" crap is ridiculous. Either allow all calibers of firearms or only allow muzzle loaded firearms. Or just extend rifle season.
Socialism is ridiculous. As a staunch conservative, I agree with you there as well. However, you cannot have my crossbow. If you take it, how in the hell will I survive the zombie apocalypse??
Socialism is ridiculous. As a staunch conservative, I agree with you there as well. However, you cannot have my crossbow. If you take it, how in the hell will I survive the zombie apocalypse??
I figured as much. My issue isn't so much with the crossbow. As I said, I've only hunted with one 2 times. My issue is those that insult others for using one. I've lurked on this site for years without posting, and finally just became a member, so that's a few years of suppressed thoughts into these posts!
Not insecure at all. I love shooting it, and I don't care what anyone thinks about that. I bought it for 2 reasons- I love to shoot it, and I wanted my son to be able to bowhunt with me, and he is not big enough to pull back a bow. Truth be told, I've only hunted with my crossbow twice and killed 1 deer with it. I hunt with my compound bow and rifle every other time, and I've killed plenty with both weapons (and with other people's weapons as well).
I just find it funny when someone questions someone else's manhood for not doing what they do. For example, I have hunted with a crossbow. That doesn't mean I CAN'T hunt with a 100lb English warbow. It just means that I prefer not to. And to those doing the insulting, I just want to see the superior reason they have to do the insulting. If you tell me I'm a puss but then tell me you use a bow with 85% let off shooting 315 FPS, then, I'll just say your are a puss for not using an Indian Flatbow with cedar arrows and flint knapped heads. That takes more "manliness" to successfully harvest an animal with than a compound bow. Try to hold back a 100 lb longbow for 30 seconds while a huge buck stares at you.
Now, draw on that same buck with your Matthews that you can comfortably hold back for an hour because of the cams, and I'll question why you aren't man enough to use the longbow. See? It's the same argument applied to a different weapon in the same class just like comparing a compound bow to a crossbow.
I just find it funny when someone questions someone else's manhood for not doing what they do. For example, I have hunted with a crossbow. That doesn't mean I CAN'T hunt with a 100lb English warbow. It just means that I prefer not to. And to those doing the insulting, I just want to see the superior reason they have to do the insulting. If you tell me I'm a puss but then tell me you use a bow with 85% let off shooting 315 FPS, then, I'll just say your are a puss for not using an Indian Flatbow with cedar arrows and flint knapped heads. That takes more "manliness" to successfully harvest an animal with than a compound bow. Try to hold back a 100 lb longbow for 30 seconds while a huge buck stares at you.
Now, draw on that same buck with your Matthews that you can comfortably hold back for an hour because of the cams, and I'll question why you aren't man enough to use the longbow. See? It's the same argument applied to a different weapon in the same class just like comparing a compound bow to a crossbow.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I also hunt with a real bow. I've had many kills with them from squirrels to whitetails. I consider myself a good bowhunter, and I've worked hard to become one.
And I counter with this- archers don't belong in the special hunting class with real hunters- men that hunt with spears. Taking a bow that has an 85% let off shooting carbon arrows at 315 FPS with razor blades on them is not manly enough. Unless you hunt with a longbow, cedar arrows with turkey feathers, and hand knapped broadheads, you must be a puss, right?
And spearhunters don't belong in the special class of hunters that do it with their bare hands. Using a blade is for pansies that weren't patient enough or are too stupid to learn to use their hands.
Because that's what it's all about, isn't it? You're "tough enough" to hunt the way you do, and anyone doing it an easier way is not as "tough", right? So what do you say to all of your padnas that use firearms to hunt? That's about the least challenging way to do it. Sit in a heated box 150 yards away with your 300 win mag, your Vortex Optic fixed on the 8 deer eating the pile of corn you spent hundreds of dollars on, and pulling the trigger. Real tough to do, right?
So to sum up, I've spent about 35 years "learning many crafts". Shotgun, bow, crossbow, rifle, throwing knives, axes, Katana swords, etc. I feel pretty confident that I can hit a target with any of those weapons that I choose to discharge. I, however, am also an ethical hunter, and I do it because I enjoy it. I put myself in positions to make the most ethical shots possible in an enjoyable way. Some days, that involves a longbow. Some days, it involves a compound bow. Some days, crossbow.
As I said before, unless you have learned the craft of firing 100lb longbows accurately at up to 35 or so yards, it's not right to question someone's manhood for using a different weapon than you choose to use.
Now, have you ever killed a deer with a firearm? And what is your current bowhunting setup?
And I counter with this- archers don't belong in the special hunting class with real hunters- men that hunt with spears. Taking a bow that has an 85% let off shooting carbon arrows at 315 FPS with razor blades on them is not manly enough. Unless you hunt with a longbow, cedar arrows with turkey feathers, and hand knapped broadheads, you must be a puss, right?
And spearhunters don't belong in the special class of hunters that do it with their bare hands. Using a blade is for pansies that weren't patient enough or are too stupid to learn to use their hands.
Because that's what it's all about, isn't it? You're "tough enough" to hunt the way you do, and anyone doing it an easier way is not as "tough", right? So what do you say to all of your padnas that use firearms to hunt? That's about the least challenging way to do it. Sit in a heated box 150 yards away with your 300 win mag, your Vortex Optic fixed on the 8 deer eating the pile of corn you spent hundreds of dollars on, and pulling the trigger. Real tough to do, right?
So to sum up, I've spent about 35 years "learning many crafts". Shotgun, bow, crossbow, rifle, throwing knives, axes, Katana swords, etc. I feel pretty confident that I can hit a target with any of those weapons that I choose to discharge. I, however, am also an ethical hunter, and I do it because I enjoy it. I put myself in positions to make the most ethical shots possible in an enjoyable way. Some days, that involves a longbow. Some days, it involves a compound bow. Some days, crossbow.
As I said before, unless you have learned the craft of firing 100lb longbows accurately at up to 35 or so yards, it's not right to question someone's manhood for using a different weapon than you choose to use.
Now, have you ever killed a deer with a firearm? And what is your current bowhunting setup?
So you hunt with a speargun? Well, that's not spearhunting. You're using a device that propels it. True spearhunting is throwing the spear.
Then, if you spearhunt, it's not good enough. You should just use a knife to make it "real".
Then, the knife is not fair. You should just use your hands.
See? When does it end? A crossbow is a legal method of taking game. Why does the degree of difficulty matter? Is rifle hunting "only for handicapped people?" I can pull back a 100lb warbow, but it's not enjoyable, and it would probably lead to me making stupid shots on an animal. Therefore, I use my compound bow in most situations. I also have a crossbow, and I love to shoot it. It's enjoyable. And it limits a lot of the possibility of me wounding an animal. So I also use that. I have many rifles, and I use them as well. I can throw a spear, and I'm sure that if it came down to it, I could take an animal with it. However, when there are more efficient options at my disposal that are legal to use, I would rather use a higher % option that will lead to a cleaner, more humane kill instead of just upping the degree of difficulty just to prop up my ego. My ego needs no propping up!
Then, if you spearhunt, it's not good enough. You should just use a knife to make it "real".
Then, the knife is not fair. You should just use your hands.
See? When does it end? A crossbow is a legal method of taking game. Why does the degree of difficulty matter? Is rifle hunting "only for handicapped people?" I can pull back a 100lb warbow, but it's not enjoyable, and it would probably lead to me making stupid shots on an animal. Therefore, I use my compound bow in most situations. I also have a crossbow, and I love to shoot it. It's enjoyable. And it limits a lot of the possibility of me wounding an animal. So I also use that. I have many rifles, and I use them as well. I can throw a spear, and I'm sure that if it came down to it, I could take an animal with it. However, when there are more efficient options at my disposal that are legal to use, I would rather use a higher % option that will lead to a cleaner, more humane kill instead of just upping the degree of difficulty just to prop up my ego. My ego needs no propping up!
They fire sticks with broadheads on the ends of them propelled by strings attached to limbs. And you have to pull back the string for it to fire.
So what type of spear do you use to hunt with? Metal, or flint knapped?
So what type of spear do you use to hunt with? Metal, or flint knapped?
So do you use metal blade spears to hunt with, or do you knap your own out of flint?
re: Land financing question
Posted by senshado on 10/15/20 at 8:18 am to truthbetold
If you have the cash, you may want to approach the bank that you deal with and ask them to do a savings or CD secured loan for the purchase of the land. The rate will be the lowest possible, and the money will still be in the bank (albeit, frozen to secure the loan). As the loan pays down, the money would become available. You could even do a mortgage on the property and pledge it to the loan as well. That way, if you would need access to the funds, the bank would still have the land as collateral and would be more likely to allow you to access the funds.
re: Was the fly a drone?
Posted by senshado on 10/8/20 at 10:31 am to NashvilleTider
If Pence winds up with COVID in the next few days, I'll be 100% convinced it was. No sarcasm.
They boys told Wyatt that he'd be "by the big oak" at one point. Someone must have relayed that to Doc.
I've told my family that they have to have the following phrase somewhere in my eulogy:
"Death greets me warm. Now I will just say goodbye!"
"Death greets me warm. Now I will just say goodbye!"
re: Body of man killed in 1998 found in Houma; Suspect arrested.
Posted by senshado on 10/2/20 at 9:22 am to deaconjones35
That's him. Pepper. He and Shannon were friends.
Popular
9
