- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | The Old City Icehouse |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 9976 |
| Registered on: | 5/9/2004 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
"We are systematically dismantling the regime's ability to threaten America or project power outside of their borders," the president said. "That means eliminating Iran's navy, which is now absolutely destroyed,
Guess he was wrong.
0
re: Shannon Elizabeth Joins OnlyFans
Posted by Morgus on 4/15/26 at 11:56 pm to Slumpbuster
If Alyson Hannigan joins and does things with flutes I'll sub.
"Amaze."
re: I hear Myrtle Beach is lovely this time of year
Posted by Morgus on 4/15/26 at 4:54 am to Darth_Vader
I see Myrtle Beach got culturally enriched.
re: Johns Hopkins admissions data shows plummeting number of blacks
Posted by Morgus on 4/14/26 at 11:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Black Americans make up only 0.84% of the total U.S. population with an IQ of 130 or higher which is a good standard for an elite medical school like JH. 3% is very generous.
That looks like VERY good work there.
re: Brit Brit is in rehab.
Posted by Morgus on 4/13/26 at 6:55 am to WildcatMike
I can fix her.
Just sit at the bar.
Know how many killings are going on in Sudan, Myanmar and Ethiopia? Wanna go in there too?
Meanwhile, actual Americans are being killed by "immigrants" right here at home.
Meanwhile, actual Americans are being killed by "immigrants" right here at home.
re: Skeleton found in Nola storm drain
Posted by Morgus on 4/8/26 at 6:39 pm to arseinclarse
This is what I want our attention on. Not fricking Iran.
re: Flying over England now. Show time baby
Posted by Morgus on 4/7/26 at 2:08 pm to BigGreenTiger
We may finally see shock and awe. 2003 was not an example despite that term being popularized then.
I mean, we can be sure she has no kids to worry about leaving behind right? She'll just have to relocate her dogs and cats.
re: Are flat earthers bout to have a bad day.
Posted by Morgus on 4/2/26 at 4:06 pm to ChatGPT of LA
They would have found reasons to doubt it before AI but after AI???
quote:
I find it interesting that you feel comfortable stating that his saying “you’re not going to like this” and offering her dog a treat is definitively a threat, and yet also stating definitively that her calling 911 and lying about his threatening her life while making a point of saying that it was a “black man” who had made said threat had nothing to do with his race.
One of those two things seems vastly more likely to me than the other; yet, we seem to fundamentally disagree as to which is which.
Perhaps it has something to do with him admitting that he used this tactic to deal with unleashed dogs before. "I pulled out the dog treats I carry for just such intransigence." He's admitting there that he wasn't carrying treats to make dogs happy but rather to scare dog owners into compliance. We can add to that the fact that he had appeared before the board that oversees Central Park operations complaining about dog walkers unleashing dogs in areas not designated for it and claimed there that his attempts to get them to comply had resulted in 2 people assaulting him (this was just days before the viral incident). I could go on but the point is that the public knew almost nothing about this because everyone was too busy forming the mob.
By his own admission, this guy set himself up as a park monitor with his own set of enforcement tactics that resulted in multiple conflicts. A pretty standard definition of what people mean when they call someone a "Karen." But she mentioned his race so her life was destroyed and he got a Nat Geo show because that's all the public thought they needed to know.
quote:
She called 911 and said that a black man was threatening her life. She lied and explicitly cited to his race while doing so. You can attempt to sugar coat it all you’d like, but she knew exactly what she was doing.
His threats aren't a sugar coating. Its a crucial piece of information regarding his own culpability in the exchange. And that man had done precisely this thing before.
But the world never got to hear about one whole side of that incident which resulted in her life being torn apart within a day. It was presented as though the man did nothing at all. Just minding his business. That's the point. Even if you find fault with how she reacted, that simply doesn't mean what he did needn't be known or is irrelevant or might actually reveal 2 people - not just one - not behaving rationally.
When the consequence is having your job taken away, the dog taken away and getting death threats from complete strangers I think more information is always better than less.
LINK
re: Listening to SCOTUS Birthright argument: WE ARE FRICKED
Posted by Morgus on 4/1/26 at 1:37 pm to Covingtontiger77
The Progressive position is simple: we are on stolen land and don't belong here unless your parents don't speak English and you were born yesterday. Then the place was made just for you.
quote:
Because you aren’t reading them. Did you just miss out on the news article of him hauling a lawyer...
That expands on the events relating to the IT guy? Is the IT guy also the lawyer that got hauled before his court? Maybe it's you who need help with reading.
quote:
What about the multiple posts of him treating others in entirely separate situations the same way. Still worthy of the benefit of the doubt because they were misunderstandings as well?
You mean the other clips that also lack much context?
This is why internet mobs are so easily formed I tell ya. Be less eager to join them.
re: Judge is a d-bag to IT guy who fixes his audio issues
Posted by Morgus on 4/1/26 at 12:52 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
Remember after that event when video after video was posted of that kid being a complete shithead to everyone? Oh wait, that was this judge you're defending.
"We don't need more information than a 20-second video with little context because we have other unrelated 20-second videos without context too!"
Judges get angry. If all you have to do is string together snapshots in time of someone getting angry to "prove" any given snapshot is never understandable then it will never will be for anyone routinely filmed on the job. Maybe him blasting the IT guy wasn't justified at all and there is no history that might reveal otherwise. But we just don't have enough information to say this.
Social media has turned the world into a Jerry Springer audience.
Have yet to see a single post expand on the events relating to the IT guy.
Now I understand that there are people of sufficiently low IQ that they believe that if you find other videos of a person running a tight ship in his courtroom that means you don't need many details about a specific case. I'm just not one of them.
Surely that judge is NEVER justified in getting angry and we never need to know much of anything to say so. Every 10-20 second video contains all the information we need.
Now I understand that there are people of sufficiently low IQ that they believe that if you find other videos of a person running a tight ship in his courtroom that means you don't need many details about a specific case. I'm just not one of them.
Surely that judge is NEVER justified in getting angry and we never need to know much of anything to say so. Every 10-20 second video contains all the information we need.
quote:
Are you referring where he said he keeps treats on him, as owners who refuse to leash their dogs generally don’t like strangers offering their dogs treats, so they leash them once he offers?
If so, no, him offering dogs treats (even as manipulation) does not justify her calling 911 and claiming he threatened her life. If not, what are you referencing?
Him telling her he'll "do what he wants and she won't like it" before trying to lure her dog with a treat is an obviously implied threat.
But it doesn't matter whether you think she should have called the cops. What matters is that you realize that there was more to that exchange than the guy's race and the world reacting as though there wasn't is an example of a viral video missing some pertinent information.
She didn't get fired because she called the cops. She got fired because people thought her motivation for calling the cops was simply his race.
Popular
28
