Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: allrightX3 | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:Texas 
Location:Lone Star
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:140
Registered on:7/24/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Forum
Message
quote:

If you can come up with something more worthwhile than saying that nuclear material was detonated under the WTC maybe I’d listen.



Laugh.

Like talking about the 2.3 Trillion missing and the correlation between those missing funds and the locations destroyed at the Pentagon and WTC7? You continue to openly show no interest in those verifiable facts.

You are clearly either limited intellectually to the point you can't even notice how dumb you're being or you're just not a good person and enjoy shitting all over a genuine attempt to have discussion.
He had no genuine interest in dialogue.

He was here to fortify his firewall and validate his internal comfort.

In a way, I think it's almost better to stay comfy. I can empathize with people who avoid existential crisis. It makes sense to protect our internal comfort.
Well, good thing you've added them now.

Thanks for sharing a picture of a hole in a wall and a small part of an engine.

Now that we see a hole in the wall and some small fragments of plane debris we can rest assured there was no foul play involved in destroying the Pentagons budget analyst office and WTC7, where information on the missing 2.3 Trillion was housed, on the same day.
Another former Cardinal doing well
quote:

My question stands though.

If he was in ANY WAY connected to destroying evidence of the missing trillions, why announce said trillions the day before? You know he couldve postponed that PC



I think filling in the blanks with assumption/theory is not important and derails the progress of anyone trying to take a journey of growth-in-understanding.

It's more important for people to become aware of all or as many puzzle pieces as possible so they can at least see that there is a puzzle to assemble.

2.3 trillion missing is a puzzle piece. The fact the budget analyst office was destroyed at the Pentagon is a puzzle piece. The fact that information + the SEC info was housed at the destroyed WTC7 site is another puzzle piece.

Acquiring these puzzle pieces, and the thousands like them is how growth-in-understanding occurs on this topic.


quote:


No, I have.


Nah.

You hadn't because you were perplexed by the concept of dustification. This was new to you in this thread.
quote:

So you think the only think these buildings were built from is steel?

No sheetrock? 4" thick hardy material flooring? Concrete? Nothing else?


I'm not following why you'd think that or where this comment is coming from.
quote:


Okay let’s entertain your superior research and understanding.



If you asked how it would be turned to dust, you obviously have not come into contact with the research you claim to have.

Dr Judy Wood explains her ideas for dustification via directed energy.

It's more likely to have been nuclear from underneath, which plays in line with the first-hand accounts of explosions from under the building before impact above.

quote:



You realize that buildings have massive empty spaces for people to use, right? Most of the space was occupied by empty air. It’s not like you’re going to see the exact same outline of the building as it was standing if it’s collapsed on the ground.


That’s like me putting together a 10in by 10in cardboard box and then smashing it flat and calling it a conspiracy because the box is no longer 10in by 10in when it’s smashed flat.


Nah, it'd be nothing like that.

Really bad analogy.
quote:


How in the frick would it turn into dust?



And this right here shows your limitations in your research and understanding.

Again, I ask, what was referred to as 'ground zero' prior to 9/11/01. It was a universal term for something.

re: Hello Missouri

Posted by allrightX3 on 8/1/21 at 5:02 pm to
Keep following?

Please share with me the other time?
Imagine pushing aside 2.3 Trillion Dollars and ignoring that both locations that housed that data were destroyed on the same day with the idea that had anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon the damage would've been bigger. Imagine being that afraid to see.
Might help to accompany my quote with the link you shared showing a steel column going from virtually erect in the air to dust before hitting the ground.

There wasn't nearly the amount of rubble that should have been there.

quote:


The cores are falling apart and collapsing while shedding the residual dust that has caked them in the collapse.




Nah.

That's steel literally disintegrating to dust in the middle of the air which is why there wasn't nearly enough debris at ground zero for a collapsed building of that size.

Do you know what the term 'ground zero' always meant until 9/11/01?

I could care less about those subjective details, honestly.

What I do care about as it pertains to the Pentagon:

9/10/01 it was announced 2.3 Trillion is unaccounted for in black budget spending.

9/11/01 the budget analyst office at the Pentagon is directly hit, destroying all information inside. At the same time, the other location this information was housed was destroyed at WTC7 in NYC.

quote:


Insisting we blew up our own buildings in the name of public surveillance is a little much



Not sure where you've gotten that from.

911 didn't happen for the sole purpose of public surveillance.

It happened because it was a capstone event that created the platform for the accelerationism that is happening today.

Also, it wasn't an 'inside job' as you're interpreting it within our own government.
Unfortunately the controlled demolition theory is a scam.

It's purposely fueled with some logic and some evidence but ultimately the organization: Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, which promote this theory, is totally fraudulent and led by an operative.

Explain to me what is happening between :33 and :37 seconds in your second link.
quote:

You're not helping the cause for actual Conspiracies.


Explain
quote:


I’m not arguing about what was hit inside the Pentagon.


You said if anything besides an airplane was used to destroy the Pentagon the damage would be greater while ignoring the notion that the budget analyst office was the only intended sector of the Pentagon that was intended to be destroyed for the verifiable connection that office had to what was also inside WTC7.

Not here to change the mind of people like yourself. Here to offer 101 level, baby step intro's to people who may become inspired to take their own journey of discovery.
quote:

quote:
I find, as any human should, that to be odd to the point of impossible.


It’s not impossible. Improbable, sure. But not impossible.



This quote is why this form of communication is a waste of time when someone like yourself needs to cope more than they desire genuine dialogue.

Cutting off the statement that followed that sentence makes your comment completely redundant and void of any relevance.
quote:


you are the one that relies on conspiracy theories for your own “emotional safety



Anything I've shared here is acquirable information, not a theory.
quote:

Beside all the airplane wreckage, if they did use a missile or suicide drone to destroy part of Pentagon there would surely be more damage. An airplane crashing into the building is like humming an aluminum can at a cinder block. A missile or suicide drone loaded with explosives would’ve done a lot more damage.


This comment is made in ignorance as you are either not aware or are not taking into account what was hit at the Pentagon - the budget analyst office.

If one of the many agendas in play on 911 was to eliminate evidence and traceability of 2.3 Trillion dollars of black budget spending, you'd want to destroy the location at the Pentagon and the other location inside WTC7, which is what happened.
quote:



The truthers don’t want facts.


If you read this thread you'd find the opposite to be true, as people like yourself do not want to acquire information on this event. It is all firewalled for your own emotional safety.

quote:

So your understanding of physics leads you to believe that everything in that building should have been consumed by the fireball created when the fuel from those planes ignited?


Nope. Not talking about a piece of paper on a desk on floor 11.

Talking about a passport inside a plane that exploded into a massive fireball on impact with a steel building going hundreds of miles an hour. I find, as any human should, that to be odd to the point of impossible.

re: Biltong vs Beef Jerky

Posted by allrightX3 on 8/1/21 at 2:01 pm to
I've had good, yet inconsistent, results with Stryve.

re: Hello Missouri

Posted by allrightX3 on 8/1/21 at 1:55 pm to
King Alpha's don't fap.

We make you do it while you listen outside the door to the claps.



re: Hello Missouri

Posted by allrightX3 on 8/1/21 at 1:53 pm to
Aw

Just as Kentucky thought they were making strides.

Just as Kentucky thought they had a real football program.

In comes 2 MegaDons pushing you back down to joke status.

re: Hello Missouri

Posted by allrightX3 on 8/1/21 at 1:46 pm to
That has no value.

Forecasting the blowup of a blue blood flagship school in the state with 100k more high school football players than the next state as a member of the SEC is where your mind needs to be.
quote:

Yawn ….

Read this trash long enough and soon you’ll believe Abraham Lincoln fired the last shot from the Grassy Knoll.



Stay comfy.

Stay happy.

Don't research.

Don't acquire information.

Don't critically analyze what is available.

Imagine not caring that evidence of 2.3 Trillion dollars was destroyed at both locations the information was stored on the same day in two cities and not even being slightly concerned or suspicious.