- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 11228 |
| Registered on: | 7/27/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: The problem with this country is the freedom
Posted by AGGIES on 1/17/26 at 8:47 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Our liberties are constantly used against us. And wtf can we do about it?
Protect liberties. Accept that people will say things you don’t like to hear.
0
re: Another Federal judge trying to frick up the country once again.
Posted by AGGIES on 1/17/26 at 8:36 am to SallysHuman
quote:
That’s because they understand this judge’s idea of peaceful protesters is likely different from reality- because were it not, there’d be no reason for such a proclamation.
Specific examples are better than vague statements.
One specific example would be Filming ICE officers. That is not obstruction.
Yet ICE was threatening those who were filming with arrest.
quote:
Burn it all fricking down and let the return of civility and morals rise from the ashes.
In other words, you’re saying “Tread on Me”
re: Big Pharma or the CIA?
Posted by AGGIES on 1/16/26 at 4:16 pm to Placekicker
Is it true that the bill would allow for blood draws of those accused, but not convicted of a crime?
If so, that would be a pretty significant thing to omit.
If so, that would be a pretty significant thing to omit.
No. Are you implying that no judicial review of invoking the Insurrection Act is possible?
Or that no review of the specific actions of those troops is possible?
Or that no review of the specific actions of those troops is possible?
The Whiskey Rebellion and hunting down Aaron Burr don’t have any correlation to Minnesota.
There is a high legal threshold for “insurrection” or “rebellion”. And protests are not necessarily riots.
But the Insurrection Act is certainly a hot button topic today for Constitutional Scholars and Lawyers today. Many are suggesting reforms are needed to restore the appropriate balance of power as was originally intended.
Also keep in mind that in 2025, The Supreme Court ruled that Trump had no legal justification for sending National Guard troops into Chicago.
There is a high legal threshold for “insurrection” or “rebellion”. And protests are not necessarily riots.
But the Insurrection Act is certainly a hot button topic today for Constitutional Scholars and Lawyers today. Many are suggesting reforms are needed to restore the appropriate balance of power as was originally intended.
Also keep in mind that in 2025, The Supreme Court ruled that Trump had no legal justification for sending National Guard troops into Chicago.
Yes. As I stated in another thread. People are having a hard time looking outside of their own interests in the immediate short term.
We went from: “Don’t Tread on Me”
To: “It’s ok - Tread on Me”, “But Tread on Them First”
We went from: “Don’t Tread on Me”
To: “It’s ok - Tread on Me”, “But Tread on Them First”
re: Dear Conservative. The Insurrection Act history lesson.
Posted by AGGIES on 1/16/26 at 1:09 pm to SpecialK_88
People are having a hard time looking outside of their own interests in the immediate short term.
We went from: “Don’t Tread on Me”
To: “It’s ok - Tread on Me”, “But Tread on Them First”
We went from: “Don’t Tread on Me”
To: “It’s ok - Tread on Me”, “But Tread on Them First”
quote:
We need the Insurrection Act
First you need the Founding Fathers to explain to you the purposes of The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution.
Trump’s ideas are more and more isolationist.
What advice is he being given?
The kind of people who are talking to him on a daily basis are giving him some very closed minded ideas.
What advice is he being given?
The kind of people who are talking to him on a daily basis are giving him some very closed minded ideas.
quote:
Your school has yell leaders.
So the point of the thread got blown up… and we’re back to this. Cool.
Ok this is a tangent that might be getting misconstrued.
Noem made a big deal about her intent in her initial press conference. Now all the arguments here are that intent doesn’t matter.
My issue was really with Noem, and not your arguments. So I could’ve started a different thread on Noem’s disinformation.
Similar to calling a bruise “Internal bleeding”…
If the shooting was by the book and justified, then we don’t need all of this BS. That’s all.
Noem made a big deal about her intent in her initial press conference. Now all the arguments here are that intent doesn’t matter.
My issue was really with Noem, and not your arguments. So I could’ve started a different thread on Noem’s disinformation.
Similar to calling a bruise “Internal bleeding”…
If the shooting was by the book and justified, then we don’t need all of this BS. That’s all.
It matters to me, Sam.
I don’t want you getting killed by a cop at a traffic stop when you were not threatening his life, and then have Secretary Noem say you were trying to run him over.
I don’t want you getting killed by a cop at a traffic stop when you were not threatening his life, and then have Secretary Noem say you were trying to run him over.
quote:
i dont know what Kristi Noem has to do with this or why she disagrees with me, but i'm right and you are wrong. if she agrees with you, then she is wrong too.
Just that the intent of the driver was a primary focus of the press conference. That’s all I was saying.
It was relevant to the govt narrative before they knew all the video existed.
There’s a lot more discussion regarding the big picture, outside of just pure law enforcement protocols related to moving vehicles.
quote:
her intent is irrelevant in this case.
Kristi Noem disagrees with you.
She was trying to drive away, not kill ICE officers. That’s dumb as hell.
No doubt the bullet shower her or any other American what happens when they piss off the authorities….
re: ICE Agent reportedly suffered internal bleeding from being hit by SUV
Posted by AGGIES on 1/14/26 at 10:39 am to wookalar1013
quote:
Poor widdle guy got an ouchie. Good thing he shot that scary middle aged woman in the face 3 times. We’re all very lucky to have survived her rampage
But he got big mad and called her a “furkin bitch” for that bruise. He showed her who is boss all right.
Seems like the Govt. Narrative already changed from the original press conference stating a deranged woman tried to run him over…
re: ICE Agent reportedly suffered internal bleeding from being hit by SUV
Posted by AGGIES on 1/14/26 at 10:32 am to RollTide1987
Is that a fancy way of saying he got a bruise?
re: 170 confirmed instances of citizens temporarily detained against 622K forced deportations
Posted by AGGIES on 1/14/26 at 10:07 am to suavecito80
You’re going to have to clarify a couple of things.
These raids?
Happening forever?
Serious answer… Yes. It’s different. This isn’t the typical roundup at Home Depot.
It feels different when there are masked people pointing guns at people in their cars on neighborhood streets.
The American Public sees a much different, much more indiscriminate, much sloppier and less precise operation than what has been seen in previous years.
These raids?
Happening forever?
Serious answer… Yes. It’s different. This isn’t the typical roundup at Home Depot.
It feels different when there are masked people pointing guns at people in their cars on neighborhood streets.
The American Public sees a much different, much more indiscriminate, much sloppier and less precise operation than what has been seen in previous years.
Popular
8
