- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
IMSA_Fan
| Favorite team: | Clemson  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 783 |
| Registered on: | 7/26/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
TPUSA totally lost the plot with younger male voters when they went hard neocon and supported this War in Iran - when it’s well documented that Charlie would have massively opposed military action (like Tucker, Kelly, Rogan). This demographic is screaming from the rooftop for help in affordability and in the labor markets with their unemployment at 2.5x the national average. I think this group is going to complete the political horseshoe and end up supporting someone in the Graham Platner mold in 2028 - perhaps John Fetterman if he runs.
0
re: Saudi Foreign Minister - Edited -Info is fake
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/15/26 at 6:58 am to Chazreinhold
Saudi, and more importantly their Arab allies, are pissed about the blockade
Money’s not going to matter if he continues to be 15+ points underwater
re: What lever does Trump pull to improve economy before November
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/12/26 at 3:03 pm to Yaboylsu63
I think they’ve just written the midterms off at this point
Hypothetically to cripple the Iranian economy more than it is already crippled
re: Negotiations have failed
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/12/26 at 2:50 pm to Auburn1968
Ok - how do you propose we do that and how much is it going to cost? If you war game the scenario, you will destroy the world’s energy infrastructure pretty much every time
We should write off our losses as sunk costs and pull out. Nothing good is going to come out of blowing more crap up and escalating further. Destroying the world’s energy infrastructure would cause a significant global recession that could last for years.
re: CBS: Americans overwhelmingly support Trump’s goals in Iran
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/12/26 at 2:40 pm to hawgfaninc
You can support all of these things. I just don’t want taxpayers to be the ones paying for it
re: Trump: No relief at the pump for midterms
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/12/26 at 2:38 pm to Tigerfan1274
It’s going to be interesting to see if the Fed has to push rates up to combat runaway inflation
Yeah this one nails my thoughts about the war
Iran kind of holds the trump card in this knowing the US Congress will not continue to fund this war
Trump Warns Iran ‘Whole Civilization Will Die’
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/7/26 at 7:28 am
Yes this is terrifying
I believe that same poll (if you look at the exp polls page) has Dems +6% when they asked voters who they plan on voting for in the congressional election in the fall.
LINK
LINK
You can definitely respond to this. The bigger issue isn’t just how Wang defines the exceptions; it’s who gets to change the rule at all. Birthright citizenship has been settled through the 14th Amendment and long-standing precedent, so altering it should take an act of Congress (or an amendment), not a unilateral shift. Otherwise, you risk a yo-yo effect where one president restricts it and the next expands it again, and the Court generally wants to avoid that kind of instability around something as fundamental as citizenship.
On her argument, saying there’s a “universal rule” with a “closed set of exceptions” isn’t unusual in law. But the weak spot is how fixed those exceptions really are. Once everything hinges on being “subject to the jurisdiction,” you’re in a gray area that can be interpreted different ways. That’s exactly the concern. If the boundaries can shift depending on interpretation, it reinforces why changes should go through Congress to keep the rule consistent and predictable.
On her argument, saying there’s a “universal rule” with a “closed set of exceptions” isn’t unusual in law. But the weak spot is how fixed those exceptions really are. Once everything hinges on being “subject to the jurisdiction,” you’re in a gray area that can be interpreted different ways. That’s exactly the concern. If the boundaries can shift depending on interpretation, it reinforces why changes should go through Congress to keep the rule consistent and predictable.
re: Trump is intentionally looking unhinged.....
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/7/26 at 6:34 am to CharlesLSU
The “D” is for dementia
I get the argument you’re making—it’s basically the idea that acting a little “unhinged” can make adversaries think twice. If people on Facebook are saying “Trump is unhinged,” you could imagine Iranian officials thinking he might actually be unpredictable enough to follow through, and that could create some deterrence. There’s a version of that logic that makes sense on the surface.
But there’s also a real “what if” here. What if the recent irrationality and the sharp 180 on foreign policy goals aren’t a strategy at all? When you combine that with what looks like a growing disconnect from his own base—who are loudly focused on affordability—and even side obsessions like things such as a White House ballroom, it can start to feel less like calculated unpredictability and more like something else entirely. Some people would look at that pattern and see not “brilliance,” but a sign he could be mentally deteriorating. Even if that’s not the case, it risks creating confusion abroad and frustration at home, which is a pretty unstable mix.
But there’s also a real “what if” here. What if the recent irrationality and the sharp 180 on foreign policy goals aren’t a strategy at all? When you combine that with what looks like a growing disconnect from his own base—who are loudly focused on affordability—and even side obsessions like things such as a White House ballroom, it can start to feel less like calculated unpredictability and more like something else entirely. Some people would look at that pattern and see not “brilliance,” but a sign he could be mentally deteriorating. Even if that’s not the case, it risks creating confusion abroad and frustration at home, which is a pretty unstable mix.
Idk - this all ends when Trump can’t get funding through the war through congress
Social Security = a form of welfare
re: Here’s the next 1st Lady if the SAVE Act isn’t passed, trying to put a sentence together
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/6/26 at 5:57 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
She has two degrees from Stanford. Also, today I learned Gavin used to be married to Kimberly Guilfoyle
Popular
28
