Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: The Pickwick | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:543
Registered on:1/21/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

quote:

A more controversial question for this board would be New Orleans restaurants that Metairie/Kenner people love


Good question.

90 % of the places mentioned in this thread are not even in New Orleans.
$200,000 down and only $149,800,000 more to go!
Up until this year, he could have played in the game for IU :lol:
quote:

twins


Those things look awful online
quote:

Her using her vehicle as a weapon did grant him reason to end the threat. Some of you dumb mf's think movies are reality


After watching the cell phone video and hearing the audio, I would make the arguments that she did not use her vehicle as a weapon and his life was not in danger at all.

Maybe I am wrong but we will see how this plays out. I’m sad that we are at this point in our country.
Who the frick was she going to run over? Nobody was in front of her.
quote:

Not saying it's justified, but 100% HER fault.


Then we agree on the shooting.
quote:

g?? You think he had time and/or the line of sight to shoot her tires out when he is about to be smashed


His head shot was pretty quick and accurate :dunno:
quote:

She would still be alive if she minded her own business and didn't have her car perpendicular across the street. Her actions are what caused the altercation.


Totally agree. But that doesn’t make her killing justified.

He could have let her go and arrested her at a later time. Doesn’t seem she was afraid to be seen in these protests.
For him to believe his life was in danger or serious harm was imminent from a stopped vehicle he was literally less than six inches from is asinine.
quote:

both putting her in the wrong.


So if someone is in the wrong, murder is justified. Got it !!!!
quote:

She was still trying to get away


So you can legally kill someone for trying to get away ???
There were many options he could have done. Probably shoot her tires out or let her leave would have been the two better options.
quote:

Just because you survive doesn’t mean danger was not present.


And just because it happened before does not mean you are allowed to murder someone the next time :dunno:
quote:

You read the OP with a tunnel vision typical of someone who has no clue as to life-death social responsibility


The same thing happened to this guy a few months ago except he was actually drug by a vehicle and he was fine. This suv was stopped. His life was not in danger.

My point is there were other options available instead of murder.
quote:

You mean why would he assume his life or the life of others was in danger? That was what you meant ... righ


I read the OP to mean that since it happened to him before it was ok for him to act the way he did in this incident. I was just trying to ask what made him think his life was in danger since the same thing happened to him before and he came away fine.
quote:

And the standard of “imminent threat” isn’t just your life being in danger. It’s also serious bodily harm.


That didn’t happen to him last time either
quote:

A rational person would determine that he should have shot sooner last time and needed to learn from his mistake, which he did.


It didn’t kill him last time so why would he assume his life was in danger this time???