Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: Turbeauxdog | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:24180
Registered on:8/24/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Astin's biggest claim to fame was his family name. Guy really hasn't done anything before or after LOTR.


Bro.

Bro.

The problem with applying economic theory to the actual economy is almost all theories assume rational actors making marginal decisions in an orderly market.

It has no ability to predict outcomes when those assumptions fail.

And those assumptions always fail.

I'm not intending to discount economic theory it's, just when you see that the assumptions are not in place you can't assume the outcomes will hold.

That's what is going on now.
quote:

You think that particular video somehow establishes that she saw this agent? OK


Of course, because it does.

I think you should watch it again and again and again. Maybe eventually you'll come to the correct conclusion
quote:

He used deadly force Was she intending to kill him?


She was intending to drive through him, again if you want to argue she didn't think that would kill him, given she's obviously a moron, that's certainly possible.
quote:

I doubt it.


The cell phone video from the agent who shot her confirms you are (as usual) incorrect.

If you want to argue it was attempted manslaughter versus attempted murder, that's fine.

It doesn't change the outcome or analysis of the police officers actions one bit. It does provide more context for social commentary.

But she definitely saw him when she gunned her car through him. So I don't think you can rule out intent.
quote:

An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision,


This is so retarded , just another example of the court lighting its credibility on fire.

The fact someone could be so stupid as to write that , read it, and not recognize the complete intellectual failure questions that persons qualification to deliver mail for the government much less preside over legal cases of national consequence.
quote:

70% of NGOs do NOT receive government funding.


Why would you even classify as an ngo if you didn't?

Are you simply referring to non-profits?
The worst was ivory falling for the nyt liar who (with an argument that defied physics) "proved" that he wasn't struck.

quote:

. Advocates for the agent are going to say that in the heat of the moment his three shots were one continuous action. And that’s plausible, but it’s what the jury thinks that matters.


This isn't going to trial dude, the feds would have to bring charges
quote:

You are correct that the weapon did not "clear leather" until the vehicle was moving, but he started reaching for it while the vehicle was stationary.


It's incredible the instincts these officers have after their years of experience.

He could feel the murderous count's intent.
quote:

I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.


Here's something you can learn. Don't allow the narration from a liar nytimes retard of a video (that illuminates the exact opposite of the retards narration ) impact your perspective.

If you work for that organization you should be assumed to be a stupid dishonest piece of shite.

Think you can learn that?
quote:

the 4th amendment so hard to comprehend? Nobody has the right to demand you stop and try to open your door without a damn good reason. You might want to live in a police state. I do not.


She was about to be arrested for obstructing the officers.

She committed two crimes that we know of that day. Obstruction and attempted manslaughter/murder of a federal agent.

The combination of the two got her killed.

quote:

they reconciled the blurry video that appears to show Ross being hit by Good's SUV.


This was the most retarded part of the video.

It's absurd.
quote:

You're right that this does seem to make it not look like the 2nd video does not show him being hit. It's hard to tell though.


No he's not, the vehicle definitely pushes the agent as his body moves with the direction of the vehicle while his posture and bodily movement take no action that would move him away from the vehicle.

Harry carry and this low t times liar are retards.
quote:

Which shot? Just the 1st, right? Certainly not the 2nd or 3rd.


If the first was justified, they all were.

The tard expecting a human brain to differentiate between the shots while defending themselves needs to just be laughed at.
Thanks for that, confirms officer was completely justified.