Favorite team:	Virginia
Location:	Pennsylvania
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:	3
Registered on:	6/10/2008
Online Status:

re: Haynesville Shale

Posted by cavalier333 on 6/10/08 at 6:14 pm to TigerStuckinOkieland

When in the process would the commission make a ruling on how a specific well would be unitized? Is it a case by case basis? Is a well typically "unitized" just before royalties would begin to be paid?

Would a drilling company need to specify the planned unit size on a lease, given that a 640 acre unit would distribute royalties much differently than a 1920 acre unit?

Hope these questions make sense... And thanks for the info...

Money Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Haynesville Shale

Posted by cavalier333 on 6/10/08 at 4:30 pm to TigerStuckinOkieland

I heard rumblings about the unitization of Haynesville wells having "larger that normal" spacing.... something in the order of around 1900 acres (i.e. three sections) - any truth to that?

And thanks for your quick response...

-cav

Money Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Haynesville Shale

Posted by cavalier333 on 6/10/08 at 4:04 pm to TigerDog83

Tigerdog...

When there are announcements about new Haynesville well locations/completions in the Shreveport paper, what does the term, "non-unitized Upper Haynesville" mean? Other wells simply list the formation - i.e. Cotton Valley... but I just wondered what the phrase "non-unitized" was getting at.

Thanks, and I may have more questions for you later...

- Cavalier333

Money Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

Popular