- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
tigertracts
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 481 |
| Registered on: | 11/22/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Football season can’t get here fast enough.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/2/26 at 8:41 pm
MBB and baseball—dumpster fires. Lane gives us hope.
9
re: This is why you don’t extend a coach just because he won a natty.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/2/26 at 8:32 pm to MrKnowItAll
Finally, somebody who gets it.
re: This is why you don’t extend a coach just because he won a natty.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/2/26 at 8:28 pm to PurpNGold1985
Love it.
This is why you don’t extend a coach just because he won a natty.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/2/26 at 8:27 pm
:popcorn:
We’re not who we thought we were.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/2/26 at 8:25 pm
And that’s ok.
Is Cooper Flagg out for the season?
Posted by tigertracts on 3/1/26 at 8:57 pm
(No Message)
Tigers 2-22 with runners in scoring position over the last 3 games.
Posted by tigertracts on 3/1/26 at 2:44 pm
I’m a wee bit concerned.
What’s happened to our bats???
Posted by tigertracts on 3/1/26 at 2:40 pm
:popcorn:
re: Was the struggle with Dartmouth just aberration?
Posted by tigertracts on 2/28/26 at 1:10 pm to PurpNGold1985
Mission accomplished. Lol.
Was the struggle with Dartmouth just aberration?
Posted by tigertracts on 2/28/26 at 1:05 pm
Or should we be concerned?
Dawn Staley is the best active WBB coach—hands down…
Posted by tigertracts on 2/16/26 at 7:04 am
CKM is more than solid and we will likely make the sweet 16.
Anybody else concerned we’re not blowing out a division II type program such as Milwaukee?
Posted by tigertracts on 2/15/26 at 2:22 pm
(No Message)
Giving up 5 runs to Milwaukee??
Posted by tigertracts on 2/13/26 at 8:01 pm
Anybody concerned? I’m really not.
:popcorn:
:popcorn:
re: Will Campbell getting manhandled hurts to watch
Posted by tigertracts on 2/8/26 at 8:39 pm to Cd104
Was shocked he went so high in the draft. Good kid. Overrated.
Over/Under on Lane going for it in 4th down inside his own 40 yard line in 2026—7
Posted by tigertracts on 2/2/26 at 7:39 pm
I’ll say PUSH
Having Lane offsets the trauma of men’s BB.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/24/26 at 7:05 pm
(No Message)
Dude can’t close out a game.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/24/26 at 7:02 pm
Choke artist.
Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Posted by tigertracts on 1/20/26 at 6:25 am
Projected Final Score: LSU 38, Indiana 31
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Posted by tigertracts on 1/20/26 at 6:21 am
Projected Final Score: LSU 38, Indiana 31
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
re: Mendoza is no Burreaux.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 9:07 pm to LSUgrad88
Lol
re: Mendoza is no Burreaux.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 9:00 pm to LSUgrad88
Sissy sellout
Popular
20
