Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: TheTideMustRoll | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Birmingham, AL
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Executive Management
Number of Posts:10641
Registered on:12/13/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
The correct answer, unfortunately, is Golesh. Auburn is due for one of their patented "RKO out of nowhere" years.
That dude would have been a beast on the DL. Oh well. What might have been. He seems to be doing all right with his current career.
quote:

1. LSU baseball


I'm pretty sure we've got a really good wheelchair basketball program if we're sinking to this level.
Wade is probably sitting in his office thinking, "Man, this whole 'basketball coach' business becomes a lot easier when there is no team to coach. I don't know why I didn't think of this before! Will Wade, you goddamn genius!" Then he eats peanut butter straight from the jar while watching Netflix all day.
The only title that would make this list make any sense at all would be "First 20 College Football Teams the Author Thought Of". Seriously, this is just an awful attempt at a ranking and both the author and the OP should be ashamed of themselves.
This is legitimately one of the worst "blue blood" rankings I've ever seen. No world exists where Alabama is not #1 by a sizable margin. Both Ohio State and Michigan are ranked too high. Miami at #4 is comical. Clemson #12? Oregon #16??????? This is a bad, bad list.
There is no team an Alabama fan wants to beat worse than Tennessee. There is no team an Alabama fan hates to lose to more than Auburn.

re: Would you watch this?

Posted by TheTideMustRoll on 4/15/26 at 12:26 pm to
Reality, why can't you be this great?
'Scuse me while I kiss this guy
quote:

Hand the refs a way to just award a team a win


LSU fans everywhere just woke up screaming in a cold sweat. :lol:
Augusta National - a group of ultra-capitalists running their organization in the most uncapitalist way possible.

"What's the report on the merchandise sales for this year's Masters?"

"Well, all items sold well, but one item - a yard gnome - sold incredibly well, so much so that there were very long queues forming just for the opportunity to buy one. We could probably charge ten times more for them than we currently do and they'd still sell out. Should I raise the price and increase the order size for next year?"

"Absolutely not! Cancel them completely and never sell them again."


I'm not complaining, mind you, I just find it funny. :lol:
Move Player up to #8 simply due to majors but otherwise I think your list is a good one.
quote:

Pretty sure this is the holding cell at Kyle Field


Pictures of girls on the wall. Does not check out.
European soccer fans (at least the ultras) are basically street gangs masquerading as team supporters, so yeah, I imagine their stadiums all need to have ample police facilities.
quote:

just like the bama football fans they seethe with jealousy of


ftfy
Still waiting... and waiting... and waiting... for any moon landing deniers in this thread to explain away the SELENE evidence.
quote:

The days of Goofy Gus lucking Auburn into a good season every few years by grinding a randomly good RB's knees into dust beside a team of upperclassmen are over. They'll be lucky to win 6 games.


quote:

From this thread I can see how Galileo was arrested, convicted, imprisoned, and his books burned for arguing that the universe did not revolve around Earth.


You are nothing like Galileo. He had proof for what he believed. You have been presented with proof and refuse to accept it. Do you see the difference? And saying, "But hundreds of millions of people agree with me!" is meaningless and intellectually dishonest. There are over a billion Muslims in the world. Does that mean that you need to convert to Islam?
quote:

The SELENE probe operated from 2007 to 2009. How did it prove that the photos and video were 100% real? You say it was because of the terrain. This ignores that we had already been in orbit around the moon, and Russia had landed on it multiple times by 1969. If NASA was clueless about the environment and terrain, how did they choose landing sites


This is what I assumed your response would be, and I'm sorry but all it does is show that you do not have a firm grasp of the history of lunar exploration or how planetary surveys actually work. You are correct that we had some idea of what the lunar surface was like in 1969 - we could say that a given area seemed rugged or upraised, or that it seemed flat and relatively smooth, but we could not say that this feature of the moon was 300 meters above lunar "sea" level while this other area was 30 meters below. We had only a very general idea of the topography of the surface. One of the purposes of some of the earlier Apollo missions (10 is a very good example) was to get close-up photos of some of the proposed landing sites to give them a better idea of what to expect precisely because they did not have that level of detail. But even with those photos the best they could do was to say, "Yes, this area seems pretty flat and level," when choosing the final sites. So, in your world where they are building moon sets on sound stages to fake the landings, they might have known generally where to put hills and depressions, but they would have had no idea how high to make the hills or how deep to make the depressions - that information did not exist at the time. What the SELENE evidence shows is that the photographs from the lunar surface - again, many of which show astronauts walking on the moon - conform to the actual lunar terrain to a degree that would not have been possible to achieve artificially at the time of the mission. That kind of detailed information about lunar topography did not exist until SELENE provided it decades after the fact.
I'll ask you again since you seem to have overlooked my earlier post: how do you explain away the SELENE evidence, which shows that photos sent from the moon during the Apollo missions, and which show astronauts walking on the lunar surface, could not have been faked since they contain information that was not known at the time the missions were conducted?