Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: L.A. | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:Los Angeles Dodgers 
Location:The Mojave Desert
Biography:Ridding the world of psycho-babble, one shame-based inner-child at a time.
Interests:golf, wine, blues guitar
Occupation:shrink
Number of Posts:65940
Registered on:8/20/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Kristi Noem body slams Senator Chris Coons

Posted by L.A. on 3/3/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

You call that a body slam?

I do, yes.
I rewatched it last year and loved it so much I bought the book on Amazon and read the book. The slow-burn suspense, with little hints dropped along the way until the final reveal was near perfect IMO.
quote:

the attack reportedly occurred during the vote count.

:lol: :bow:

re: Her name is Mooné Rahimi ..

Posted by L.A. on 3/2/26 at 6:59 pm to
Two figs down voted boobs

:rotflmao:
quote:

Please read the dissenting opinion. I would love to hear how those lib hags justify their opinions on this

The dissents can be found here.

SCOTUS document cloud

The 3 Stooges dissented.

ETA: It's interesting to me that 2 of the 3 DEI hires do not have children. Of the 3: Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson, only Jackson has children.


quote:

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on March 2 backed a federal district court’s ruling that parents have a right to be told if their child changes their name, or pronouns they’re using in school.

The ruling is now back in effect in California after it had been put on hold, the first time the Supreme Court has gotten involved in challenges across the country over how schools are handling students’ gender transitions.

In 2024, California became the first state to ban school districts from requiring that staff notify parents of their child's gender identification change.

Four California parents and four teachers represented by a Catholic legal group say the state is requiring schools to hide children’s transgender status from their parents, a violation of the parents’ and teaches’ constitutional rights.

One set of parents said they were not told that their junior-high daughter was being treated as male at school for most of a year. The other parents said they were lied to by their daughter’s teachers about how she was being referred to at school.

In December, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego said parents have a constitutional right to be informed if their child expresses “gender incongruence” at school and barred educators from intentionally keeping gender transition information from parents. Teachers also cannot “socially transition a child over their parent’s objection,” the judge said.

usa today
quote:

Schumer is such a clown. They don't care about being correct - they'll just throw baseless lies out and hope one gets some traction.

Their new talking point is "Trump is in the Epstein files"

Yeah, he is. He's in there when he kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of Mar a Lago. He's in there when he informed on Epstein to the FBI. And he's in there again when he pleaded with the FBI to investigate Ghislaine Maxwell, calling her "evil"

The Democrat leadership is demon possessed.



`
Good write up by the National Review on what a nothing burger the Epstein files have turned out to be

quote:

The release of the Epstein files was supposed to uncover a vast conspiracy of elite pedophiles, or at least expose people who were guilty of crimes but got a free pass from prosecutors.

Instead, it has led to Yale University suspending from his teaching duties . . . computer scientist David Gelernter.

What did Gelernter do? He didn’t commit any crimes or even do anything unethical. He sent an email to Jeffrey Epstein years ago that mentioned in passing that a female applicant for a job with Epstein was attractive.

Instead of the real-life QAnon scenario we were promised, the release of the Epstein files has embarrassed, and led to professional consequences for, a series of accomplished people who emailed and socialized with Epstein but didn’t abuse underage girls.

Should Larry Summers have been pursuing an affair with an adult fellow economist to whom he was apparently a mentor? No, of course not. But should we have violated every rule and norm around how we typically handle raw investigative materials in a federal investigation in order to nail Summers for a lapse that has nothing to do with what was the purpose of the release of the files?

national review




We'd be better off with some eye for an eye style vengeance. You murdered my son, I'm going to kill you