Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: thegoodbubba | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:Oregon 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:31
Registered on:8/15/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Forum
Message

re: Legit 20-to-1 LSU ratio ...

Posted by thegoodbubba on 9/3/11 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Fans we talked to said they are told what color shirts to wear. It's on their tickets, and it's serious business. You wear the color you are told. I laughed.


A couple of times over the last few years various people have tried to get everyone to wear a certain color, but for the most part Ducks fans don't do this. Everyone just wore what they were going to wear anyway.
quote:

Cal Santa Barbara Banana Slugs... it doesn't get any worse...
UCSB is the Gauchos, you are thinking UC Santa Cruz.

I think I have had the least intimidating mascots ever, in college I was a Duck in high school I was an aardvark
It's a wash, I was hoping both of those idiots would pick LSU.
I don't know what predictions you are seeing, but I am seeing a very even split. I also don't recall have seen any serious analyst predict a blowout either way. But hey Tiger fans really like to play the disrespect angle, so have fun with that. I'll help you out Oregon 59 LSU 7.
quote:

Slick Stick or whatever did say "blackout," but he meant that ABC as a channel would not be offered by Cox due to a contract dispute.

NBC was blocked by Time Warner here in Austin for a good three weeks until a deal was reached.



You do know there is a thing call an antenna? Even if your cable company was in a contract dispute you could simply plug in a tv antenna and you would be good.
quote:


Never said that moron. I think they are a great team but I think that some of the things they do are busch league. Going for 2 for no reason is busch league. I can't wait til it cost the ducks a game.


I actually think it is closer to miller lite league, I've never like Busch.

Luckily it won't ever cost the ducks a game because we always line up in a two point formation, if you don't have enough players on that side of the field, we go, if you do we kick. I can't recall us ever being unsuccessful on a two

re: Worst Gary Crowton call?

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/31/11 at 11:16 am to
quote:

This guy got so much flack and I believe most of it was unwarranted.


I would agree with you, but as an Oregon fan he had the exact same issues at Oregon. Started off good, got worse, called inexplicably plays in odd situations, had an uncanny ability to find plays that worked and went away from them by running time after time plays that got stuffed.
quote:

He may be a freshmen but you have to think why is he in there?




Maybe its because the player who was ahead of him graduated last year...


I am a bit concerned, but I would be more concerned if he got the job by default. He beat out more experienced players.

Besides him, there is only other person on the line without significant starting experience. The line concerns me, but it concerns me less than WR. then again I was confident about the line agianst Boise St, and LSU is certainly beeter up front then Boise St.
I've used Justin TV on my phone before. they even have an iphone app

re: NCAA / Russell Shepherd

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/30/11 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Not a housing issue. He "discussed his NCAA questions with a player about to be interviewed by the NCAA".


This is the same concept as why Dez Bryant got suspended for a year for lying even though the thing he was lying about was not an NCAA violation.

More then taking money from agents the thing the NCAA will hammer you hardest on is interfering with the enforcement process.
Honestly, why would any D1 school want him for one year. He hasn't shown he is that great of a QB. I don't really see it being worth it for a school to have even an average QB for just one year.

re: thomas vs. lee

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/30/11 at 8:44 am to
quote:



Not against SEC teams, quackleberry....


You're right, in two games against SEC teams he has 563 yards passing. That averages out to 281.5 yards a game passing, which is better than the 221 he averaged for the year. I guess we should assume if he played an SEC shceduled he would have better stats.
quote:

It was already a long topic...didn't want to spell out Oregon.
Luckily UO would have sufficed.

I am glad UO doesn't have any freshman playing against ULS, that way we can bring all of our players to the game against LSU.
quote:

Ohhhhhh an abbreviation boom!!!


I'm sorry, let me revise my predection

UO 34
ULS 17

It really isn't asking that much to get the name of the team you are playing correct.
quote:

LSU 35
OU 10


Thats nice if you ever play Oklahoma, but how do you think LSU will do against UO?

UO 34
LSU 17
quote:

Auburn gave us a games worth of ways to contain the Oregon offense, since LSU's defense is no less (overall) talented as the Auburn 2010 defense, and arguably better


Here is the thing, Oregon did okay against the Auburn defense besides a few small things that can be fixed. Darron Thomas didn't make good decisions at times especially in short yardage situations. You better believe that was worked on a lot over the summer. Twice oregon went inside the 20 and came away with no points because they couldn't convert in short yardage. If they come away with 10 points in those situations, then no one would be talking about Auburn containing Oregon.

Granted, anyone can look back and get rid of the bad plays to prove their point, but in order for LSU to win I believe they are going to have to hold Oregon to a lot less yards then Auburn did. If Oregon gets 450 yards I think they are scoring around 30 points, I don't see how LSU gets that many.

re: .

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/28/11 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

yes, 81 yard throws are what I would call a statistical outlier, it counts but I'm talking about consistency...your quarterback didn't have it during the



You keep ignoring 363 yards passing. You are the only person on the entire planet who think Auburn won that game because Auburn BACK 7 shut down Oregon. Anyone who knows anything about football, so once again I am not talking about you, knows that the game was won in the trenches.

Honestly I don't get your argument. It is a perfectly reasonable argument that LSU will win because they are superior on the line, but to think they will win because of a huge advantage of match ups at the skill position is just ignorant.

re: .

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/28/11 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Actually I do, Your QB threw 2 interceptions, Oregon got 125 of their passing yards on 2 plays...2 plays, otherwise your QB failed to consistently get yards through the air.


You have caused me to change my opinion of you, no longer do I believe you don't know what you are talking about, now I think you are actually just stupid. Thomas had 363 yards passing, so while he did gain 125 on 2 plays (which by the way was only 3 less than LSU gained all game against Auburn), he gained 248 on the rest of the plays.

By the way all defenses in the world are great if you simply subtract out the big plays they give up. Moron.

re: .

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/28/11 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Anyone else not sweating the Oregon game?
The way I see it, JL is at worst on par with JJ.



If this is the case why was JJ your starting QB? Do you think you know that much more than your coach. Yes Lee may be a better passer (though according to stats he isn't much better), but that doesn't necessarily make him a better QB.

re: Lee's numbers vs. Oregon

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/28/11 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Well for the 40 times you shouldn't base your opinion on Rivals numbers, I got mine from the GoDucks website. Here's the little part about Dior's 40 time electronically timed "took first in the 40 yard electronic (4.74 seconds) during winter conditioning.


The conditions were awful and all of the 40 times were slow. Luckily a number of our players also ran track.You can look up their 100 times if you want.

re: .

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/28/11 at 8:16 am to
quote:

First post on the rant, so go easy.

I watched a pitiful Auburn back 7 physically dominate this team.


Maybe you shouldn't have made a post because then everyone wouldn't have realized you have no clue what you are talking about.

I assume you mean front 7, because if you mean back 7 that indicates you didn't watch the game. Oregon lost the game at the line of scrimmage, but we did light up the Auburn secondary. Second Auburn did not have a pitiful front 7, Nick Fairly in particular changed the game.
quote:

Oregon couldn't sell out National ChampionShip game tickets so yea it will def feel like a home game.


Actually you are 100% wrong, but that is okay. Oregon sold all of its tickets and had demand for a lot more. What Oregon fans were not willing to do was pay 1000 dollars or more in large numbers for tickets
quote:

Like someone said in another post, he can bill them as little as $1 or $5 each--he can bill them how much he wants. But I wouldn't worry about any NCAA involvement in this--they've got too much else on their plate already!


Actually if the pro bon work is problematic so would giving them a discounted rate. An extra benefit is not only a free benefit, a discount would apply as well. That being said, in my entirely non expert opinion if he has a history of doing pro bono work for LSU students int he past, i don;t se why this owudl be a problem.
quote:

Duck Football twitter - Seems OU fans are outraged about LSU not suspending or kicking players off the team yet. I think OU fans are rushing to judegemnt regarding LSU allegations. Seems Hyprocritical after the last 2 offeseason over here.


Perhaps if you did a search for Oklahoma you found this, but I guarantee no Oregpn fan said that as Oregon calls itself UO.
quote:

Pac-12 OOS games 2012 ^=BCS conference game

ARIZONA-northern arizona, oklahoma state^, UL Lafayette.
ARIZONA STATE-UC Davis, Mizz^, Illinois^.
CAL-Fresno State, Presbyterian (really).
Colorado-Hawaii, Colorado state, OSU^.
Oregon-LSU^, Nevada, Mizz state.
Oregon state-sacramento state, wisconsin^, BYU.
Stanford-San jose state, duke, Notre dame^.
UCLA-houston, san jose state, Texas^
USC-minn^, syracuse^, notre dame^
UTAH-montana state, BYU, pitt^
washington-eastern washington(FCS Champs), hawaii, nebraska^
washington state-idaho state, UNLV, san diego state

So pac 12 plays 12 total OOS games from BCS conferences.

SEC plays 13 total OOS games from BCS conferences.


You might have a point if your facts weren't wrong and you didn't leave out an important detail.

First the important detail, the PAC-12 only plays 3 OOC, not the 4 the SC plays. That means as a conference they only play 37 (Colorado gets an extra game because they play at Hawaii) versus 48 of the SC, 25% less games.

Second, while Duke may suck, they are a BCS team, so that is one more.

Third, the Cal- Colorado games which was scheduled a while back is an OOC game, so that is two more.

Then end results is of the 36 pac 12 OOC games 15 are BCS 41%.

The SEC has 13 out of 48 27%

Not saying the PAC-12 is better, I understand why the SEC schedules like it does, but its OOC schedule is better.
quote:

good for the PAC-10...four of there games a year are harder than most other conferences when 8 of the rest of their games are garbage compared to the SEC
Actually the PAc-12 plays 9 conference games and only 3 OOC. You can think of that extra conference game as equal to a OOC game against a BCS conference team if you like.
quote:

Your secondary may have a couple of decent players, but overall, I would consider this a weak spot.


Can you explain why you would consider this a weak spot? A secondary that was among the nation leaders in intereceptions with 21, that lost only one player. That sure seems like a strength to me.

Not that I would consider CFN the greatest source, but if they rank that unit as 5th best in the nation, at minimum that means it is not a weakness. LINK

Luckily you have JJ throwing the ball, so even if Oregon had a weak secondary I wouldn't be that concerned.

re: So Darron Thomas is in a car...

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/17/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

You can literally admit your stoned
He didn't admit he was stoned, he admitted at some point he smoked pot. The cop gave him a field sobriety test which he passed, therefore the cop did not believe he was under the influence.

re: So Darron Thomas is in a car...

Posted by thegoodbubba on 8/17/11 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Answer my fricking question dickbag. How is driving 118mph in a car that doesn't belong to you ON A SUSPENDED OUT OF STATE DRIVER'S LICENSE not constitute an arrest? Is that legal in Oregon?


It's not legal in Oregon, but it is not an arrestable offense. I personally knew someone in college in Eugene who was arressted for going 40 miles over the speed limit with an expired (granted not suspended) license. He was not arrested, all that ahppened is that a licensed driver had to drive the car home.
quote:

118 mph on a suspended license with the smell of weed in the car, yet he gets let got with nothing more than a ticket. I know you claim that 118 is no big deal up there, but the suspended license and weed is what ticks me off.



When I was at Oregon a guy in my dorm had a comparable experience to this. At about 3 AM he was driving 75 through downtown Eugene (maybe a 30 zone) with 3 other guys. The probability that someone in this car was high approached 100%. As it turns out this guy wasn't paying attention and his licensed expired a couple of weeks before.

All the cop did was check to see if one of the other people had a valid license and put him in the drivers seat, give the original driver a big ticket and they were on their way.