Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: soonerinlOUisiana | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:Oklahoma 
Location:South of I-10
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1929
Registered on:8/17/2012
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The pope is a pedo protector


In fairness, the sex scandal (and related cover up) within the church hierarchy was more about fa-ggotry than it was pedophilia. The victims were overwhelmingly sexually mature males. The number of victims who were what one would call “little kids” was negligible. And anyone who grew up Catholic would know that little kids are simply never around priests (or other church adults) except perhaps in large groups.

Granted, fa-ggots have no place in the priesthood (or in decent society) either, and the church has done a pretty good job of purging those abominations from her ranks (except for the quasi-Catholic Jesuits). May God curse the Lavender Mafia for eternity for the damage they have done and the pain they have inflicted.

Lavender Mafia

quote:

Shameful


What is shameful about it? The pope is white-knighting for a moslem terrorist regime that is hell-bent on exterminating Jews, Christian’s, and all other non moslems. Now THAT is shameful.

PS: frick you, too.
quote:

3pm: Women's Gym title meet


How does this play out? I see there’s a bracket like other sports with a final 4. Does that get reduced to 2 and then a champ? Or will the champ be chosen from those 4?
quote:

Religious leaders have one directive. To follow and advance the spread of the teachings of Jesus Christ.


OK, but does anyone think Jesus wants murderous moslems to have nuclear weapons? Does Jesus want men to be schlonging each others’ turd channels? Does He want babies to be killed in the womb? Does He want men to cut off their dicks and become women?

Looks like Jesus really is a Republican (not the RINO or the cuck type)
Cradle Catholic here. frick the pope. Except in rare instances, he’s fallible like everyone else
quote:

These threads always make me laugh. China isn’t the one abducting world leaders and invading other countries.


Who abducted a world leader? Pray tell.
quote:

frick you


Well said. Sir Winston, frick you.
quote:

Not quite. You’d be awarding them based on the votes of every state, INCLUDING your state. You left that last part out.


You are essentially letting non-Virginians vote in the Virginia election. You left that part out. But then again, the left loves having outsiders vote in elections.
quote:

No you haven't. For example, you haven't answered this question: if the vote is counted in the national tally, and the determining system is the national vote (not the state vote which you keep going back to irrationally), then how is that vote disfranchised? The results of the state-based election are literally irrelevant if the system chosen relies on the national tally. The fact that this system is contained within one state, and their electoral college representatives are sent from the state, has no bearing relationship to the method used to determine the Victor. Again, the governor could flip a coin to pick these electoral college Representatives. Or make it an even or odd word count on the first page of the New York times on a particular day. Nothing about the determination is required to originate within the state other than the vote for the system chosen


You have just written a treatise supporting my position. Well done.
quote:

But you haven't You've only responded by referencing the current system. You haven't responded discussing the hypothetical system being discussed.


Except that I have. Like I said, you are either:

A. Too stupid to see it.
B. Too dishonest to admit it.
C. Both A and B are correct.

Smart money is on “C”.
quote:

A distinction without a difference The crucial element is if the vote itself is part of the determining process. You've had multiple opportunities to address that actual point but keep ignoring that to repeat a point with no relevance to the discussion at hand.


I’ve already addressed that point. You’re just too stupid to see it, or too dishonest to admit it.
quote:

don't understand how this is any different from millions of people who vote, say, in Alabama, for a Democrat but whose votes don't count for anything when the Republican wins the popular vote in the state because it's been determined by the state legislature to be a winner take all state. Why is that not disenfranchisement?


You’re awarding the state’s electoral votes based not on the votes of the people in that state, but rather on the votes of people outside that state. It’s really not hard to understand, except perhaps for leftist dumbfricks with IQs in the range of a soccer score.
quote:

You're describing votes in the national tally for the losing side in that tally. Nothing more.


No. I’m describing votes for one candidate, that Virginia is ignoring for the benefit of a different candidate. Give it up. Your cretinism was exposed way back at the beginning of this thread. Or actually, the beginning of this board.
quote:

And? Their vote was a part of that process


Yes. And the votes would be processed opposite of who the voters voted for. Sigh. Common sense apparently is not very common at Stanford.
quote:

Say this existed in 2024. If they vote for Trump, that vote for Trump counts in the national tally for Trump. If they vote for Kamala, that vote for Kamala counts in the national tally for Kamala.


And the electoral votes would end up counting for Trump. How can you be so obtuse? Oh yeah, I forgot, because you’re a dumbfrick.
quote:

If a VA voter's vote counts in the determining system, it's not disenfranchised.


If their votes end up counting for the candidate they didn’t vote for, then their votes are nullified. You’re really getting into the spin zone now, shyster.
quote:

Sound's like you choose politics over the Catholic Church. That's something to take to the foot of the Cross and pray about.


Nope. The popes and the bishops have chosen politics. I adhere to infallible church teaching.
quote:

In this system is the VA legislature deciding to remove the VA votes from the national tally to determine the national winner?


Also irrelevant. BTW, is Virginia expected to shift red, because democrooks and rebublicucks sure as frick wouldn’t be passing this law if it were expected to remain blue.
quote:

There's roughly 46.5 million voting Catholics in the US. He's shitting on nearly 80% of them. The other 20% are liberals who call themselves Catholics that weren't voting for him or his stooges anyway.


I’m in that 80%. I have not been shite upon by Trump, but I have been shite upon by L14, Francis, the USCCB, democrooks and rebublicucks.