Kracktastic

-1

re: Halo MC collection details

Posted by Kracktastic on 10/14/14 at 6:50 pm to wish i was tebow

Am I the only one that does not prefer games at 60 fps (especially halo 1)? It makes me dizzy.

Gaming Board

re: On Instant Gratification

Posted by Kracktastic on 10/6/14 at 9:59 pm to Patrick_Bateman

Always good to draw attention to this. I think it's a very serious problem that a lot of people are barely aware of.

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 8/1/14 at 12:24 pm to Korkstand

I think we could do this forever. Thus, I will try to be as concise as possible.

I do not think the idea you are referring to is defined as morality.

Morality is defined as "the degree to which something is right and good : the moral goodness or badness of something". (There is another definition regarding beliefs in Merriam Webster, but I chose this one as we are talking about objective morality).

So for morality to be objective, good and bad must be objective. You have yet to demonstrate how you derive your idea of objective "good" and "bad".

That is what I am asking of you. To define what "good" and "bad" are without God. Nothing you've said to this point has convinced me that you have a solid understanding of your own beliefs on the matter.

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 8/1/14 at 7:14 am to Roger Klarvin

quote:
Using this kind of reasoning, one can convince themselves of literally anything by invoking God. It's a pointless way to got through life, because it completely removes logic, common sense and sensory perception from the equation.

What "kind of reasoning"? That statement is in response to someone saying that God killing people indicates He practices subjective morality. This argument began with the assumption that the Christian God is real.

If the Christian God is real, my statement is absolutely true.

And, for the record, belief in God does not remove reason, common sense, or sensory perception from the equation.

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 8/1/14 at 7:03 am to Korkstand

quote:
Korkstand

I argue that you appeal to God in your argument for objective morality when you assume life and freedom to be goods.

I assume you will disagree with me. So from where do you derive that life and freedom are "good"? Are you arguing for hedonism?

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 7/31/14 at 10:04 pm to RTOTA

quote:
Then, you list an example (one of many) where God takes a subjective view of his stated morality, and kills all first born children for some greater purpose. If what God does is always moral, then morality is not objective

It is not an objective moral truth that God should not kill. It is an objective moral truth that people should not murder.

You see we exist for no reason other than God willing it. If he wills our bodies to die that's his call. Also, if He wills a sinless person to die that person will end up in a much better place very quickly.

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 7/31/14 at 9:51 pm to Korkstand

quote:
Korkstand

Okay, I really want to understand your position here. I am pretty sure I will disagree with you, but I want to clarify.

Is it your stance that objectively moral behavior is defined by human reason, and human reason alone?

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 7/31/14 at 5:46 pm to NC_Tigah

Your "critical thinking" needs some fleshing out, my friend.

quote:
When you eliminate all subjective goals of a society (advancement, prosperity, etc) and strip it down to the essence of what a society is (simply coexisting), what remains is a very basic set of logical morals: do not kill, harm, steal... Everything else is subjective.

From where do you derive the "fact" that the essence of society is "simply coexisting"?

Furthermore you need to outline exactly how you jump from that "fact" to the conclusion that killing, stealing, and harming are objectively wrong.

re: Arguments against gay marriage

Posted by Kracktastic on 7/31/14 at 4:32 pm to Korkstand

quote:
Korkstand

I get the feeling you are making this up as you go along.

re: Q - how many of the "traditional marriage" folks are Protestant?

Posted by Kracktastic on 7/29/14 at 7:21 am to SpidermanTUba

As a Catholic, I can't believe I agree with you on a point about marriage.

Of course this doesn't really do anything to an argument that God's definition of marriage is unchangeable. It just shows that men have tried to change it.

re: Pornography addiction: anyone here overcome it or have experience?

Posted by Kracktastic on 5/8/14 at 6:47 am to High C

I was able to quit. Why is he trying to stop? Relationship issues? Religious issues?

O-T Lounge

re: Parking Question

Posted by Kracktastic on 9/7/13 at 8:54 am to MotorbikeMike

Basically I just need to know if River Road is free of traffic south of Brightside after the game.

I just seem to remember River Road being blocked off at brightside and all traffic coming from Brightside onto River Road was directed to the North- thus anyone South of the barricade should be able to go south on River Road freely.

No?

Parking Question

Posted by Kracktastic on 9/7/13 at 7:49 am

So my girlfriend and I are considering parking at her friend's apartment just south of Brightside on River Road and biking on the levee to campus. I haven't been to a game in a while, but seem to remember that they direct all traffic coming off of Brightside at River Road toward the north. If I can ride a bike back to my car at the apartment just south of Brightside will I be able to jump on River Road and head south with minimal traffic?

re: What Was the First LSU Football Game You Saw In Person?

Posted by Kracktastic on 6/22/13 at 8:12 am to JabarkusRussell

Auburn 2007- great first experience

re: Elysium Trailer #2

Posted by Kracktastic on 6/18/13 at 8:34 pm to TideSaint

This makes me really mad that they couldn't come through with his Halo movie.

Movie/TV Board

re: SNF: 49ers 13 at Seahawks 42 | FINAL

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/23/12 at 8:29 pm to AtlantaLSUfan

Hey anyone else trying to watch this online? NBC's video player is absolutely terrible.

More Sports

re: Need a live streaming leak

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/23/12 at 12:14 pm to LSUcdro

quote:
first row sports dot eu

Don't do this. I tried and my computer is getting spammed to shite right now.

Saints Talk

re: Fox in Lafayette

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/23/12 at 12:00 pm to lsusystem

Well that sucks. Good to know it's not just me I guess.

Saints Talk

Fox in Lafayette

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/23/12 at 11:53 am

Guys, I live in Lafayette and use an antenna to catch local channels, however about 10 minutes ago my Fox network just went away. Odd that my antenna wont even register the channel anymore. Anyone else have this problem? Anyway I can watch the game online?

Saints Talk

re: OFFICIAL HALO 4 THREAD - Updated OP with GT's

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/10/12 at 2:48 pm to polarbehr

quote:
New maps this week correct?

Today actually.

Gaming Board

re: LSU Only Effectively Returned 8 of 22 Starters From 1/9/12

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/10/12 at 1:02 pm to AtlantaLSUfan

quote:
Tom Bronco

quote:
Your overall point is true but you exaggerated it a bit. All new defensive backfield? You mean Reid didn't start the previous year? All new receivers? They might not have started but Beckham got lots of playing time and the others got in just about every game. Offensive line was decimated but the ones we ended up with played better than the ones we started with. Likewise new LB's were better than the old ones. And now you want us to be optomistic because we have so many players coming back. Those same players that were somehow a liability this year? And if we lost so many unforseen players this year, cannot the same thing happen next? Just keeping the facts straight.

Ahh... and there it is. So good to see the Rant still delivers.

re: LSU Only Effectively Returned 8 of 22 Starters From 1/9/12

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/10/12 at 10:43 am to AlaTiger

Nah man, this is the Tiger Rant. There is no room for optimism here.

re: Why is Johnny Manziel a Heisman finalist?

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/5/12 at 2:03 pm to CluckFemson

Anyone have that gif of his fumble/catch fumble/touchdown throw against Bama?

re: Notre Dame would be a top 3 or 4 SEC team..

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/5/12 at 1:29 pm to kilo

I disagree.

re: Scouting Alabama...

Posted by Kracktastic on 12/5/12 at 1:24 pm to ChadD3

quote:
ChadD3

Alright turbo, whatever you say. Please come back as soon as the game is over and we can discuss your... ahem... "scouting" report.

re: Anyone else respect both Miles AND Saban?

Posted by Kracktastic on 11/29/12 at 11:21 am to slackster

I do too.

re: Let's agree to disagree

Posted by Kracktastic on 11/29/12 at 10:42 am to treble hook

quote:
To the OP, Miles supporters want NC's too. 120 other teams want them too. 1 team a year gets to win. You do know that right?? I think what you mistake as complacency is really perspective and realistic expectations.

This.

re: It's good guy Mark Richt's time to shine on the big stage.

Posted by Kracktastic on 11/28/12 at 1:15 pm to TheNotoriousGOP

I think you've got a typo in your title, brah.

re: BEST/WORST Coaching performances of this season.

Posted by Kracktastic on 11/27/12 at 1:41 pm to SEC LEGEND

quote:
This is my first post, don't flame me to bad.

It's too* not to

re: Jesse Palmer just let everyone know

Posted by Kracktastic on 11/22/12 at 7:52 am to Iam4LSUnTN

Alright, apparently a lot of people need the problem with this statement explained to them...

Alabama did not win the SEC last year, LSU did. Therefore they can not win it "for a second straight year".