Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Jimbo contract does not contain the lsu clause in his contract. it was removed | Page 14 | Coach Changes
Started By
Message

re: Jimbo contract does not contain the lsu clause in his contract. it was removed

Posted on 9/29/16 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8978 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

My guess is that since DALSU is able to comment on Jimbo, that we aren't pursuing him. The fact that he cannot comment on Herman would indicate that something is going on and he can't talk about it. Just read between the lines...


Don't think that is it at all. If you think we aren't pursuing Fisher I guarantee you are mistaken. He and Herman are without a doubt on the short list.

I think what DALSU is saying that we have to wait until after the Big 12 decides on whether to take UH into the conference and that has some weight as to what Herman might do as to whether he is going to stay at UH or leave.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8978 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Jimbo contract does not contain the lsu clause in his contract. it was removed


LINK

Here is the info on Jimbo's buyout clause, $5mil prior to Dec. 31, 2016 and then it drops to $3mil on Jan. 1, 2017.

From what I read doesn't matter what college goes after Fisher if that is what they will have to pay including LSU.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8978 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Which section shows that LSU clause being removed???


There was never an LSU clause!
Posted by D500MAG
Oklahoma
Member since Oct 2010
3981 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:02 pm to
Jeez, the estrogen is strong in here.

IMO

LSU knows who they want and they know they can get him

After last year, LSU knows better than to have just one target. 2 is better, 3 is ideal. Each having different agents is the goal. Could be the reason all the different names are being kicked around.

Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
39548 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

nothing he has posted has been proven right.




That's the truth
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
15843 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:06 pm to
+1000
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11959 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Why are people so adamant on not believing everything was lined up until the plug was pulled at the last minute? I feel this has been established over and over.


Because the only info we have is supposition, rumor, and hearsay? There has been literally no objectively verifiable information regarding any of the Jimbo smoke.

So, since the rumors and suppositions turned out not to come to fruition (either because they were untrue or because some last-second deal fizzled), why now would I believe those some rumors?
Posted by lsufanz
NOLA
Member since Dec 2008
4726 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I have an iq of 136 and my degree shits on your. Anytime youd like to debate or discuss anything we can little guy. We can discuss the observer affect, why trickle dowm economy doesnt work in a global market,or why your teeth are missing. This post was edited on 9/29 at 10:37 am
And this was after an edit? Color me unimpressed.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11959 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:27 pm to
Not that I disagree with many of your earlier points, but ...
quote:

an iq of 136

quote:

degree shits on your.

quote:

observer affect

quote:

trickle dowm


If you're going to talk about your superior intellect and education, you're gonna want to make sure you don't make egregious grammatical errors in doing so.

Also, any undergrad university worth its salts would teach the basic principles of the "observer effect" and "trickle-down theory" in lower level physics and economics/political science classes. So, you could literally have a Gen. Studies degree and be able to discuss those concepts enough to at least appear that you know what you're talking about.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 1:34 pm
Posted by lsufanz
NOLA
Member since Dec 2008
4726 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Then you have not proved you own it.
Grown men have attempted to explain to you (136 IQ and all) that having proof and providing proof are two completely different things. You said "no one has proof" and were called on it. The person said he wasn't going to share it and that you could take that however you care to. You are the one who apparently doesn't understand the difference, not he.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
94989 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 2:10 pm to
This thread turned into a d*ck measuring contest.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
55515 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah, you're getting a guy who got buttfricked 35-10 by Louisville.


Well LSU has been getting buttfricked for the past 3 years so we are used to that at this point.

This made me laugh...
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
46342 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I have an iq of 136
I always knew I was smarter than you. Thanks for sharing.

Posted by TheDeathValley
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2010
20467 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Seriously, the dude's credibility was shot after Jimbo Part 1. Why do people believe him now?


No idea. What is even better is no one with any significant true inside information would put it on TD anyway...
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
14386 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 3:42 pm to
quote:


There was never an LSU clause!



Why would people think there was one to begin with? No big time program would allow that in a contract.
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

DA has a source close to Jimbo. He won't have any info on Herman. Only info he has is about Jimbo and has proven to be very accurate.



Ding ding ding!!! We have a winner folks!

Now to take this information and process it to figure out for yourselves who DALSU really is.
Posted by lesthemadhatter
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2015
1488 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 4:05 pm to
who?
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

who?


A guy that has some information about Jimbo. Duh.
Posted by lesthemadhatter
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2015
1488 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 4:10 pm to
Thanks that helped.
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7266 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

The fact of the matter is that the most recent contract was January 2015 --- long before the supposed talks between LSU and Jimbo --- and it did not have an LSU clause. Neither did the 2013 contract before it. There was no LSU clause to be removed.


Whoah! Whoah! Dude, no one in this thread is interested in facts.
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram