- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rank the NFL HC Jobs
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:15 pm to St Augustine
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:15 pm to St Augustine
Lamar will never win anything playing video games until all hours of the morning while demanding the team practices in the afternoon to accommodate him. That was a major point of contention. Those are facts. A new coach isn’t putting up with that bullshite. His attitude will be even worse. So the Ravens are out.
0
Posted on 1/8/26 at 6:33 pm to Tangineck
Baltimore
NYG
Atlanta
Tennessee
Vegas
Arizona
Miami
Cleveland
How you order NYG/Tennessee/Vegas to me comes down mainly to how you rate Dart/Ward/Mendoza. The Giants have some pretty good supporting pieces in place as well.
I think people are underestimating the hole Miami is in with having to cut Tua and a roster with some serious holes
NYG
Atlanta
Tennessee
Vegas
Arizona
Miami
Cleveland
How you order NYG/Tennessee/Vegas to me comes down mainly to how you rate Dart/Ward/Mendoza. The Giants have some pretty good supporting pieces in place as well.
I think people are underestimating the hole Miami is in with having to cut Tua and a roster with some serious holes
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:57 pm to St Augustine
I would rank them by who has a QB-
Baltimore, NYG, and Tenn have their QBs for the near future.
Raiders with the #1 pick will take their QB of choice.
Cardinals have the #3 pick, wouldn't be shocked if Murray is traded to the Jets. Whether the Cardinals draft a QB or sign the top free agent they will have a new QB next season.
Falcons and Browns stay pat at QB?
Browns will have the 2 rookies and Watson under contract, do they wait another year before grabbing their future QB?
Falcons just restructured Cousins contract, he will be with the team until March when they will cut him. If they don't, he receives a $67.9 million guarantee for the 2027 season. Penix will almost certainly start the season on IR, but Blank said he their QB of the future. They don't have a 1st round pick.
Miami and Tua are done, but Miami doesn't have the cap space or draft position to get top QB. Kirk Cousins?
Baltimore, NYG, and Tenn have their QBs for the near future.
Raiders with the #1 pick will take their QB of choice.
Cardinals have the #3 pick, wouldn't be shocked if Murray is traded to the Jets. Whether the Cardinals draft a QB or sign the top free agent they will have a new QB next season.
Falcons and Browns stay pat at QB?
Browns will have the 2 rookies and Watson under contract, do they wait another year before grabbing their future QB?
Falcons just restructured Cousins contract, he will be with the team until March when they will cut him. If they don't, he receives a $67.9 million guarantee for the 2027 season. Penix will almost certainly start the season on IR, but Blank said he their QB of the future. They don't have a 1st round pick.
Miami and Tua are done, but Miami doesn't have the cap space or draft position to get top QB. Kirk Cousins?
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:04 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:05 pm to Tangineck
quote:
Raiders
Their owner is a retard but the job itself is top 3-4 on this list
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:49 pm to Forever
quote:
Their owner is a retard but the job itself is top 3-4 on this list
Thats the largest factor of an NFL head coaching job in my opinion.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:58 am to Tangineck
It’s also the least permanent factor though 
I feel like it should be a semi-separate metric even if it affects the franchise the most in the present day
I feel like it should be a semi-separate metric even if it affects the franchise the most in the present day
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:56 am to Forever
quote:
It’s also the least permanent factor though
Umm how? Very slim odds to see an owner change outside of him dying of old age. And complete crapshoot that whoever takes it over is any more competent
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:10 am to wildtigercat93
“Umm” maybe because there were 11 teams that had ownership changes in 2024 and 2025 alone, with 3 of those being major changes? Minority stakes exist FYI. And past that, all of the owners are old to very old so I’m not sure if you think they’re going to live forever or something but they die pretty often.
But since you want to be a smartass about it, what do you think is the least permanent factor that inherently makes a job good or bad? Location? With a whopping 3 teams changing in the last 25 years? Fanbase, which basically never changes?
Umm yea that’s the point.
But since you want to be a smartass about it, what do you think is the least permanent factor that inherently makes a job good or bad? Location? With a whopping 3 teams changing in the last 25 years? Fanbase, which basically never changes?
quote:
And complete crapshoot that whoever takes it over is any more competent
Umm yea that’s the point.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:15 am to St Augustine
quote:
Rank the NFL HC Jobs
Based on history, city, fanbase, GM, owner and current rostetr.....I guess I'd go.....
Baltimore
NYG
Miami
Raiders
Falcons
Cleveland
Tenn
Cardinals
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:36 am to Forever
Idk why you are taking this so personally.
Minority stake owner changes doesn’t really mean anything. Outside of an outlier like Brady, those guys don’t affect anything operationally. And a primary owners lifespan is much longer than any roster or front office specific issues, I simply don’t see how you can call that more temporary than an owner of a team, which in a lot of cases lasts decades.
The least permanent factor would be things like roster and salary cap issues, which can change within a season or 3 with the right football people in charge and a non meddling/impatient owner.
Location and fanbase are not major factors to a job in terms of football. This isn’t OG college football where you need to recruit players based on team prestige or fanbase excitement. Personally one place may be more appealing to others and that preference is wildly dependent on each candidate and background, but I’m talking about football aspects here.
A new owner being similar incompetent, means it’s a more permanent factor of being an issue. Having a good or non meddling owner is a huge asset to any open job, as previously argued by someone else- likely the most important factor in determining short and long term success outside of having a young elite QB in place
Minority stake owner changes doesn’t really mean anything. Outside of an outlier like Brady, those guys don’t affect anything operationally. And a primary owners lifespan is much longer than any roster or front office specific issues, I simply don’t see how you can call that more temporary than an owner of a team, which in a lot of cases lasts decades.
quote:
But since you want to be a smartass about it, what do you think is the least permanent factor that inherently makes a job good or bad? Location? With a whopping 3 teams changing in the last 25 years? Fanbase, which basically never changes?
The least permanent factor would be things like roster and salary cap issues, which can change within a season or 3 with the right football people in charge and a non meddling/impatient owner.
Location and fanbase are not major factors to a job in terms of football. This isn’t OG college football where you need to recruit players based on team prestige or fanbase excitement. Personally one place may be more appealing to others and that preference is wildly dependent on each candidate and background, but I’m talking about football aspects here.
quote:
Umm yea that’s the point.
A new owner being similar incompetent, means it’s a more permanent factor of being an issue. Having a good or non meddling owner is a huge asset to any open job, as previously argued by someone else- likely the most important factor in determining short and long term success outside of having a young elite QB in place
Posted on 1/10/26 at 5:04 am to SoFla Tideroller
John I Leonard
Class of 1990
Class of 1990
Posted on 1/10/26 at 8:48 am to ChestRockwell
FHHS '82
I'd say my connection to Leonard but would dox myself
I'd say my connection to Leonard but would dox myself
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News