- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ever have a trade vetoed?
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:49 pm
I traded a guy Herbert in exchange for J. Chase and 2 first round picks next year. 10min later dude regrets it and complains to the commissioner, who then puts it to a vote and the league vetoed and reversed the trade. Such bullshite IMO.
8
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:52 pm to alabamabuckeye
trade veto's are bullshite
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:55 pm to alabamabuckeye
This would be my last year in that league.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:00 pm to TigerLunatik
I’m screwed since I’m in another league with these guys and am friends with some of them. Just frustrating because I have Allen and Herbert and nothing else so this trade would help me rebuild and get out of the basement. So I’m just fricked and have to keep paying dues to lose, I guess.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:05 pm to alabamabuckeye
Trading is an art. You can't punish people for being able to pull off trades. The only exception IMO is my work league for instance. These guys have barely ever played. One dude thought trading Burrow for Tyreek was fair. I gotta be careful with shite like that as the commissioner and half arse hold their hands through a lot of this shite.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:08 pm to TigerLunatik
True. We’ve been in this league for a few years now and everyone is pretty experienced. The guy I traded with claimed he thought I was giving him Herbert and 2 firsts for Chase, which I think is ludicrous. First, you know how Sleeper works. Second, who the hell would offer that?
Posted on 10/7/22 at 4:52 pm to alabamabuckeye
Is this a superflex league?
If not, that trade is horseshite lol
If not, that trade is horseshite lol
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:46 pm to DallasTiger45
quote:I was going to say the same, but I'm against trade veto overall unless :collusiongif:
Is this a superflex league?
If not, that trade is horseshite lol
If it's not SF, Chase is arguably worth more than Herbert standalone in a redraft, dependent on team structure.
In a Dynasty, Herbert is no where near worth Chase + (2) 1st round draft picks.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:50 pm to drizztiger
Not superflex, definitely not collusion, but was happily accepted
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 10/7/22 at 6:09 pm to alabamabuckeye
Everyone values players differently
Some strictly go by trade charts online and those are the ones who usually do it
Some strictly go by trade charts online and those are the ones who usually do it
Posted on 10/7/22 at 6:45 pm to bbeck
quote:I think you hit great points here.
Everyone values players differently
Some strictly go by trade charts online and those are the ones who usually do it
I always look at a trade to help both teams - from both owners eyes. Maybe it's easily to be on the outside and question it. I get that.
If your owners are seasoned and understand, they're looking for a trade that helps them and for the other owner.
This is why trades are often difficult to obtain. Either someone outside thinks they're getting "trade raped" or the like.
And I'm a player that have been on opposite sides of the spectrum. Also play in highly competitive leagues, many on TD.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:56 pm to alabamabuckeye
This situation came up in my league a few years back and I’d like to get the board’s opinion.
One owner was out of playoff contention and had nothing to play for. No keepers, dynasty, next years draft position etc. Nothing was in play for him in context of the season.
He made a trade that was very much one sided in the other direction for ROS to a team that was in 2nd place. However, he made a side bet with another owner about that week’s matchup and it did give his team more projected points that one week.
Think of trading away Ekeler bc he was out with Covid that week for Khalil Herbert who was starting (that wasn’t the trade but just an example)
Allow the trade or no?
One owner was out of playoff contention and had nothing to play for. No keepers, dynasty, next years draft position etc. Nothing was in play for him in context of the season.
He made a trade that was very much one sided in the other direction for ROS to a team that was in 2nd place. However, he made a side bet with another owner about that week’s matchup and it did give his team more projected points that one week.
Think of trading away Ekeler bc he was out with Covid that week for Khalil Herbert who was starting (that wasn’t the trade but just an example)
Allow the trade or no?
Posted on 10/7/22 at 9:53 pm to alabamabuckeye
quote:
Not superflex, definitely not collusion, but was happily accepted
That’s tough. I hate vetoes, but there’s zero rational defense to this trade from the Herbert side.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 10:02 pm to alabamabuckeye
quote:
True. We’ve been in this league for a few years now and everyone is pretty experienced. The guy I traded with claimed he thought I was giving him Herbert and 2 firsts for Chase, which I think is ludicrous. First, you know how Sleeper works. Second, who the hell would offer that?
I’m confused. Herbert and Chase are getting traded for each other. Herbert and 2 1sts for Chase is ludicrous in your opinion, but you want to receive Chase and 2 1sts for Herbert? What are your settings that make Herbert more valuable than Chase?
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 11:16 pm
Posted on 10/9/22 at 8:50 am to alabamabuckeye
Had one a couple of years ago that I was instrumental in vetoing. It was a free league among friends and friends of friends. Dude would always make crazy trade proposals, so everyone generally responded with equally ridiculous ones. Close to the end of the year, he would message people who were mathematically eliminated basically begging for players. Someone agreed to send QB5 for RB57 or something like that. I got that shite shut down and that was the last year I played in that league. I've always been competitive, but that just irks the shite out of me
Posted on 10/9/22 at 8:53 am to alabamabuckeye
Why did the league vote against that?
Posted on 10/9/22 at 8:54 am to alabamabuckeye
Hebert isn’t worth Chase and 2 first round picks.
The problem with QBs is that you will never get their worth via a trade.
The problem with QBs is that you will never get their worth via a trade.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:00 am to Blutarsky
I don't think this trade is that crazy. Especially considering it is for a QB.
I probably wouldn't pay 2 firsts, but I might give Chase and a 1st for Herbert. It just depends how desperate I am. I think it's lame the guy had remorse and they put it to a vote after the fact. I don't understand why the rest of the league voted against it.
I probably wouldn't pay 2 firsts, but I might give Chase and a 1st for Herbert. It just depends how desperate I am. I think it's lame the guy had remorse and they put it to a vote after the fact. I don't understand why the rest of the league voted against it.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 10:35 am to beauchristopher
quote:
I think it's lame the guy had remorse and they put it to a vote after the fact.
I bet someone let him know the trade was dumb after the fact.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 11:13 am to beauchristopher
I would never play in a money league that allowed league voting for vetoes. Commish just gets that power for suspected collusion. There is something the OP isn’t telling, I guess this is a dynasty or keeper league? Chase and 2 1sts for Herbert is a god awful trade so I can see why people vetoed it if you allow them to.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News