- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Should I accept this trade?
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:31 pm
14 team full PPR
Just got offered Najee, Ertz, and Sutton
for
D.Cook, JuJu, and Pitts
Other Rbs I have are CMC, Gordon, Boone.
Wrs: Mclaurin, MT13, Claypool
Do I do it?
Just got offered Najee, Ertz, and Sutton
for
D.Cook, JuJu, and Pitts
Other Rbs I have are CMC, Gordon, Boone.
Wrs: Mclaurin, MT13, Claypool
Do I do it?
This post was edited on 10/13/22 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:39 pm to TheDuke5524
I would not be making a trade to acquire Najee.
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:14 pm to auisssa
I accepted it. Cook is a loss, but I needed an upgrade at wr and te. I’m rid of Pitts and hopefully Najee gets back into form.
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:18 pm to TheDuke5524
quote:
Should I accept this trade?
quote:
no
quote:
no
quote:
no
quote:
I accepted it
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:21 pm to TheDuke5524
I think this is meh trade on surface.
Y’all do need to explain more than 14 team ppr. CMC and Cook, I don’t know how that draft worked. Your WRs are bad tho.
Y’all do need to explain more than 14 team ppr. CMC and Cook, I don’t know how that draft worked. Your WRs are bad tho.
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:23 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Your WRs are bad tho.
But, you're trading away a RB and a WR in good offenses for a RB and a WR in abysmal offenses.
Posted on 10/13/22 at 7:01 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:I agree with you. And on surface for me this looks like a
But, you're trading away a RB and a WR in good offenses for a RB and a WR in abysmal offenses.
And any trade that is 3v3 gets convoluted imo. I would have kept Cook here. And hope for a Pitts turnaround.
Posted on 10/13/22 at 8:06 pm to TheDuke5524
This will be regretful as soon as
Checks watch
This week
Checks watch
This week
Posted on 10/14/22 at 3:02 am to drizztiger
That’s true. I guess I just didn’t want to sweat through every week wondering if this would be Pitt’s week. And I have faith that Najee rebounds that I can’t really backup. I kinda felt bad I killed this dude on a trade last season so maybe tht came into play as well. Lol
Posted on 10/14/22 at 5:02 am to drizztiger
quote:
I agree with you. And on surface for me this looks like a trade.
I wasn't arguing. I was trying to add on to your point and probably did a poor job of it.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 4:30 pm to TheDuke5524
quote:
I just didn’t want to sweat through every week wondering if this would be Pitt’s week.
I'd rather have a TE not scoring than a RB1 (I guess for you it's your RB2) not scoring.
Najee says his foot finally quit hurting, so maybe you'll get lucky.
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 10/15/22 at 1:46 pm to TheDuke5524
Ertz will disappear once Dhop is back. They will put Dhop out wide and Moore will take the Ertz targets.
your opponent won the trade. He got the best player and the player with most upside.
your opponent won the trade. He got the best player and the player with most upside.
Popular
Back to top
8








