Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Should I accept this trade? | Fantasy Sports
Started By
Message
locked post

Should I accept this trade?

Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:31 pm
Posted by TheDuke5524
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2015
1414 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:31 pm
14 team full PPR
Just got offered Najee, Ertz, and Sutton
for
D.Cook, JuJu, and Pitts

Other Rbs I have are CMC, Gordon, Boone.
Wrs: Mclaurin, MT13, Claypool

Do I do it?
This post was edited on 10/13/22 at 5:34 pm
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
105892 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:39 pm to
I would not be making a trade to acquire Najee.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34922 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:41 pm to
Nope I wouldn’t
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4652 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 5:55 pm to
No
Posted by TheDuke5524
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2015
1414 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:14 pm to
I accepted it. Cook is a loss, but I needed an upgrade at wr and te. I’m rid of Pitts and hopefully Najee gets back into form.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
105892 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Should I accept this trade?

quote:

no

quote:

no

quote:

no

quote:

I accepted it

Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45863 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:21 pm to
I think this is meh trade on surface.

Y’all do need to explain more than 14 team ppr. CMC and Cook, I don’t know how that draft worked. Your WRs are bad tho.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
105892 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Your WRs are bad tho.


But, you're trading away a RB and a WR in good offenses for a RB and a WR in abysmal offenses.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45863 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

But, you're trading away a RB and a WR in good offenses for a RB and a WR in abysmal offenses.
I agree with you. And on surface for me this looks like a trade.

And any trade that is 3v3 gets convoluted imo. I would have kept Cook here. And hope for a Pitts turnaround.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74124 posts
Posted on 10/13/22 at 8:06 pm to
This will be regretful as soon as

Checks watch

This week
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73129 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 2:45 am to
Nah
Posted by TheDuke5524
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2015
1414 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 3:02 am to
That’s true. I guess I just didn’t want to sweat through every week wondering if this would be Pitt’s week. And I have faith that Najee rebounds that I can’t really backup. I kinda felt bad I killed this dude on a trade last season so maybe tht came into play as well. Lol
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
105892 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 5:02 am to
quote:

I agree with you. And on surface for me this looks like a trade.

I wasn't arguing. I was trying to add on to your point and probably did a poor job of it.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17426 posts
Posted on 10/14/22 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I just didn’t want to sweat through every week wondering if this would be Pitt’s week.


I'd rather have a TE not scoring than a RB1 (I guess for you it's your RB2) not scoring.

Najee says his foot finally quit hurting, so maybe you'll get lucky.
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 4:31 pm
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17489 posts
Posted on 10/15/22 at 1:46 pm to
Ertz will disappear once Dhop is back. They will put Dhop out wide and Moore will take the Ertz targets.

your opponent won the trade. He got the best player and the player with most upside.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram