- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you pay $59,950 for this ugly thing?
Posted on 10/20/22 at 8:21 am
Posted on 10/20/22 at 8:21 am
even if I had money to throw away or burn I wouldn't
LINK
eta that the text indicates it was altered to get paid 3 times the rate. What a joke except I think it's for real that price.
Here's a 1951 Fender Nocaster converted in a "Payola" style. These guitars were built by recording studio/musicians in the early 1950's in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.
LINK
eta that the text indicates it was altered to get paid 3 times the rate. What a joke except I think it's for real that price.
Here's a 1951 Fender Nocaster converted in a "Payola" style. These guitars were built by recording studio/musicians in the early 1950's in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.
This post was edited on 10/20/22 at 9:02 am
Posted on 10/20/22 at 9:18 am to Tom Joad
I find it very, very hard to believe that a 1951 Fender would have such a clean, unstained layer of 70+ year old thin skin nitrocellulose lacquer atop a maple fingerboard if it was owned by a union member session player.
Meanwhile, a paper trail should exist or be relatively easy to obtain if this instrument was tied to a union, a member, his pay stubs/receipts to the union and from the studio(s). Zero provenance even mentioned in the ad.
Until then, I see a $599.50 parts donor Telecaster at best.
Meanwhile, a paper trail should exist or be relatively easy to obtain if this instrument was tied to a union, a member, his pay stubs/receipts to the union and from the studio(s). Zero provenance even mentioned in the ad.
Until then, I see a $599.50 parts donor Telecaster at best.
Posted on 10/20/22 at 10:22 am to Tom Joad
I opened this thread and got a good belly laugh. Thank you.
Would not buy.
I don’t get this
Would not buy.
quote:
in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.
I don’t get this
This post was edited on 10/20/22 at 10:24 am
Posted on 10/20/22 at 10:25 am to Tom Joad
Looks like an Ed Roman special.
Posted on 10/20/22 at 5:33 pm to TheFretShack
I was going to say "I'd need to run that by Fret Shack first," but I see you've already spoken. 
Posted on 10/22/22 at 10:44 am to Tom Joad
Looks like something the Russian KGB would design for one of their spies, who's cover was a guitar player in a rock n' roll band in 1967, in the USA.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 2:52 pm to Tom Joad
quote:Does anyone have the knowledge to elaborate? Interesting factoid I didn't know.
These guitars were built by recording studio/musicians in the early 1950's in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 6:31 pm to UKWildcats
Seeing as how the first studio multitrack wasn't created until 1957, and the technology wasn't in widespread studio use until the early 1960s or so (and only in the US, the rest of the world didn't get any of this until the mid to late 60s), seems pretty questionable.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 6:36 pm to Tom Joad
Let me call in a friend that knows a lot about guitars.
Posted on 10/23/22 at 5:49 am to Stan Switek
quote:
Seeing as how the first studio multitrack wasn't created until 1957,
I think that would be the point of using a guitar like that, because they didn't have multitrack. 1 guitar player playing through 3 different amps from 3 different pick ups, to get the sound of 3 different guitar players all at the same time in the same room.
I don't know how well it would work, but I get the idea. I know I wouldn't want to rewire that thang.
Popular
Back to top
8







