Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Is this a fair trade or not? | Fantasy Sports
Started By
Message
locked post

Is this a fair trade or not?

Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:26 pm
Posted by JYD
Pineville
Member since Oct 2003
8511 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:26 pm
10-team league-Standard scoring

Team 1 (currently in 1st place) trades away Jonathan Taylor & Garrett Wilson (who I’ve never heard of) to Team 2 (currently in 3rd place) in exchange for Jalen Hurts.

Bear in mind that Team 1 has Chubb (1) & Barkley (3), but is only giving up Taylor (32). I realize Taylor was the top ranked player going into the year, but outside of Week 1 he’s been a total bust. I think most here would agree especially if you picked him.

Team 1 (again 1st place) had to resort to starting David Carr this week. QB is his only weak position.

Team 2 has Tua behind Hurts so he’s wanting to improve at RB and is getting a <10 point averaging a week Jonathan Taylor.

Anyway, this trade ended up being vetoed by a 4/8 vote to do so.

I was just wondering what the consensus here would be on this trade.

Thumps up=Uphold Trade
Thumbs down=Veto Trade
This post was edited on 10/30/22 at 9:29 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33062 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:36 pm to
I think it’s fine. Which side are they upset about? Hurts to the #1 team?
Posted by GatorPA84
PNW
Member since Sep 2016
6119 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:41 pm to
Seems fine nothing egregious at all honestly
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8759 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:47 pm to
Anyone voting to veto this trade is a bitch. Trade is completely reasonable
Posted by JYD
Pineville
Member since Oct 2003
8511 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

I think it’s fine. Which side are they upset about? Hurts to the #1 team?


Hurts to the #1 team.
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30814 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:55 pm to
If a trade isn’t obvious collusion, it shouldn’t be veto’d.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87117 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 9:56 pm to
Lol I'd venture to say in a 1QB setting, most trade evaluators out there still have Taylor over Hurts. And the ones that have Hurts ahead, probably not by much.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19016 posts
Posted on 10/30/22 at 10:43 pm to
4 of your league mates are pussies, trade is more than fine
Posted by lsualum01
Member since Sep 2008
1798 posts
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:49 am to
Yes the trade is more than fair, and if anything team 1 is giving up too much for Hurts. Veto’s should only be used to prevent collusion. In this case, the veto is actually being used to collude against the team in 1st place.
Also, you mentioned Taylor being a bust this year. That can change at any moment and if Taylor wasn’t struggling this trade would not likely have been discussed anyways. If you and your league mates can’t be reasonable then refer to one of many trade value charts (e.g FantasyPros) they have all over the internet to objectively decide.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17518 posts
Posted on 10/31/22 at 12:09 pm to
I would quit the league.

quote:

Garrett Wilson (who I’ve never heard of)


Got any openings in your league??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram