- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What is the truth about Cancer research?
Posted on 3/9/25 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 3/9/25 at 7:52 pm
Did DOGE really cut this or is there more to it?
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:14 pm to Rza32
quote:
Did DOGE really cut this or is there more to it?
Doge cannot directly cut anything, eh? They advise.
Anyway, if the alternative research has some teeth and things like Ivermectin, FenBen, Berberine, Vitamin C and other cheaper and/or naturally occurring substances can POTENTIALLY inhibit the growth and maybe even kill certain cancer cells, why keep spending Billions on research to only continue to Mostly treat cancer?
I do not know but I want to know, if there are alternatives to poisoning ourselves to cure ourselves?
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:17 pm to Rza32
Two questions and no opinion?
Great job on a significant post.
Would absolutely not read again.
Great job on a significant post.
Would absolutely not read again.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:22 pm to Rza32
Stop it bro. Know the facts. Cutting the fat does not mean cutting research. Cmon Man.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:26 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Stop it bro. Know the facts. Cutting the fat does not mean cutting research. Cmon Man.
Since you obviously know the facts, please clarify the “fat” of cancer research.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:29 pm to Rza32
DOGE can’t cut anything. I suspect that they found an assload of money earmarked for “cancer research” without any evidence of actual research attached to it.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:30 pm to Rza32
Cancer research is cash cow for Big Pharma and Research Organizations. Float some nonsensical hypothesis and reap the rewards in research grants. A cancer cure simply does not compute with Wall Street and Big Academia.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:33 pm to gaggies_R_us
quote:
Who fakes cancer research? Apparently, lots of people. Faked cancer data is the latest sign of science’s fraud problem.
I know it’s hard for you sheltered people to understand, but most people are actually giant pieces of shite.
quote:
It’s also troubling that the fakery was so blatant. We’re not talking about sophisticated data manipulation here — we are talking about cases where scientists badly photoshopped pictures of their experimental results.
quote:
There is another common thread between the Gino fiasco and the Dana-Farber one: Harvard University. Between Gino’s case, the resignation of Harvard president Claudine Gay, and now the alleged faked cancer research, Harvard’s reputation for academic excellence has undoubtedly taken a battering.
Blog
quote:
If you ever wondered why the progress in cancer research is so slow despite billions being invested into basic research – Sholto David will show you why.
This post was edited on 3/9/25 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 3/9/25 at 8:59 pm to gaggies_R_us
quote:
Since you obviously know the facts, please clarify the “fat” of cancer research.
That would be the DEI consultants, for example.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:00 pm to gaggies_R_us
quote:
Since you obviously know the facts, please clarify the “fat” of cancer research.
Show me where research is being cut? It’s not! If staff is being cut because of over staffing then so be it.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:02 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Stop it bro. Know the facts. Cutting the fat does not mean cutting research. Cmon Man.
I’m asking the question because it’s been a narrative. Based on your condescending comment, sounds like you don’t know either.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:34 pm to Rza32
It's only a symbolic gesture anyway. $500+ billion has been spent on cancer research since 1971 when Nixon said we would cure cancer. The death rate has hardly budged. Practically no difference if money had never been given. Big Pharma doesn't really want a cure.
Popular
Back to top
6










