- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dear Conservative. The Insurrection Act history lesson.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:05 pm
We have conservatives here freaking out over this saying things like it's unconstitutional.
So, let's dive shall we? Please open your book and turn to page 1 of USA History.
- 1792. It was called the Calling Forth Act. authorizing the president to deploy federal military forces (not just state militias) to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or obstructions to federal or state laws under certain conditions.
Please turn to page 2
- 1807. Insurrection Act of 1807... Replaced the above.
It's been used roughly 30 times. Even in 1992 with the LA riots.
Now. Here is another aspect that you need to WAKE UP to. THIS IS NOT SOME GAME BEING PLAYED BY MARXISTS. They are serious and they are not going to take it laying down. These people 100% believe we are NAZIs and all the things due to people like Clinton, Kaine, Maxine, Walz....etc.
So when or IF the Insurrection act is used, there will be some blow back from them and this is where it get real. If they fight back and attack our uniform guys, we could see martial law.
Now before you freak out over that, it's been used in the USA more than double that of the Insurrection act.
Under full martial law (military replacing civilian rule in an area), authorities could impose censorship, shutdown orders, or internet restrictions if deemed essential for "public safety" or security — similar to Hawaii's media controls after Pearl Harbor. This might include blocking platforms, requiring content removal, or cutting access to prevent coordination of unrest or spread of sensitive info.
What about freedom of Speech? No, freedom of speech under the First Amendment does not protect organizing groups specifically to "combat" (meaning use force or violence against) federal law enforcement officers (LEOs). While the First Amendment broadly safeguards speech, assembly, association, and the right to form groups—even for controversial or anti-government views—there are clear limits when organizing crosses into planning, inciting, or conspiring to commit unlawful acts.
The Supreme Court has established strict tests for when speech or organizing loses protection:
Incitement (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969)
Speech (including calls to organize or act) is unprotected only if it is:
Directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and
Likely to incite or produce such action.
So... Conservative friends. If they use social media or internet to organize to fight against Federal LEO, you could see the internet go down in that area.
So, let's dive shall we? Please open your book and turn to page 1 of USA History.
- 1792. It was called the Calling Forth Act. authorizing the president to deploy federal military forces (not just state militias) to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or obstructions to federal or state laws under certain conditions.
Please turn to page 2
- 1807. Insurrection Act of 1807... Replaced the above.
It's been used roughly 30 times. Even in 1992 with the LA riots.
Now. Here is another aspect that you need to WAKE UP to. THIS IS NOT SOME GAME BEING PLAYED BY MARXISTS. They are serious and they are not going to take it laying down. These people 100% believe we are NAZIs and all the things due to people like Clinton, Kaine, Maxine, Walz....etc.
So when or IF the Insurrection act is used, there will be some blow back from them and this is where it get real. If they fight back and attack our uniform guys, we could see martial law.
Now before you freak out over that, it's been used in the USA more than double that of the Insurrection act.
Under full martial law (military replacing civilian rule in an area), authorities could impose censorship, shutdown orders, or internet restrictions if deemed essential for "public safety" or security — similar to Hawaii's media controls after Pearl Harbor. This might include blocking platforms, requiring content removal, or cutting access to prevent coordination of unrest or spread of sensitive info.
What about freedom of Speech? No, freedom of speech under the First Amendment does not protect organizing groups specifically to "combat" (meaning use force or violence against) federal law enforcement officers (LEOs). While the First Amendment broadly safeguards speech, assembly, association, and the right to form groups—even for controversial or anti-government views—there are clear limits when organizing crosses into planning, inciting, or conspiring to commit unlawful acts.
The Supreme Court has established strict tests for when speech or organizing loses protection:
Incitement (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969)
Speech (including calls to organize or act) is unprotected only if it is:
Directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and
Likely to incite or produce such action.
So... Conservative friends. If they use social media or internet to organize to fight against Federal LEO, you could see the internet go down in that area.
11
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:10 pm to BCreed1
Trump supporters wants Americans internet taken away now 
Scary.
Scary.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:13 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
Trump supporters wants Americans internet taken away now
That's what I thought. You have a mental picture of a USA that never was.
I gave you the dates and the numbers. There is a reason it was included from the beginning.
You do not want a real conversation, you simply want to cry all over a message board.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:14 pm to BCreed1
I just want to keep my internet dude.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:20 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
I just want to keep my internet dude.
As do I. My stocks would take a massive hit. It would keep me from doing business. BUT, we are not talking about nationally. We are talking mainly Mn.
Freedom of Speech does not include organizing methods to obstruct LEO. The SCOTUS has ruled on that.
Do I wish we were not in this mess? YEP! But like I said above. We are not in some sort of game. You can not tell me that you believe that the left, like Walz (who stated China has moral authority over the USA) is simply trying to get votes. They aren't. This is not a game to them.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:21 pm to BCreed1
quote:
My stocks would take a massive hit.
Bro my stonk bro.
MUH STONKS
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:27 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Freedom of Speech does not include organizing methods to obstruct LEO. The SCOTUS has ruled on that.
If we are going to take down the internet because someone uses it for something bad, then we can pretty much use the same logic to ban just about everything else because someone will misuse it.
Quit being a retard, we aren’t Iran
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:28 pm to SpecialK_88
Nah, these Trump sycophants want this.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:32 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:
If we are going to take down the internet because someone uses it for something bad,
You can ignore history if you want. Ignore the SCOTUS. Ignore the laws.
That does not change them nor the rulings that make up USA History and Constitution.
quote:
then we can pretty much use the same logic to ban just about everything else because someone will misuse it.
It's not misuse. It organizing to create conflict with LEO and inciting violence. That's 100% not free speech.
I can not help that you do not like our history or laws.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:33 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
Nah, these Trump sycophants want this.
That's just a dumbass comment made out of total ignorance.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:34 pm to BCreed1
Your talking about fricking pearl harbor, what's going on in that cesspool of a State Minnesota isn't pearl harbor, don't be obtuse.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:34 pm to BCreed1
quote:
We have conservatives here freaking out over this saying things like it's unconstitutional.
Same people are libertarians/liberals who think illegals should have rights
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:35 pm to Jugbow
Nah, we just don't want the government dry fricking us up the arse.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:36 pm to Tunasntigers92
LOL. Nobody wants this. Just stay out of the frickin road. It’s that easy.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:38 pm to SLIPSHITE
You want to get rammed up the arse by the govt? Move to Turkmenistan and buy a fricking goat.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:38 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
Your talking about fricking pearl harbor,
NOPE.. I'm talk 1792 to present.
quote:
what's going on in that cesspool of a State Minnesota isn't pearl harbor
What a lame argument. Who said it was Pearl? Nobody. I stated that after Pearl happened we did it and it was legal because... you know... That thing called US Constitution.
Like I told your buddy. I can not help that you do not know our Constitution nor our history. I can not help that after being told you don't like it.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:38 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
Nah, we just don't want the government dry fricking us up the arse.
Is the government in the thread with us right now Mr paranoid?
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:39 pm to BCreed1
quote:
It's not misuse. It organizing to create conflict with LEO and inciting violence.
We have this thing called the justice system with these things called courts. Those courts are where it’s determined if someone is guilty of a crime, not what some rando like you says on the internet.
I’d also be very careful, because maybe the next liberal admin comes in and decides that Truth social is responsible for inciting violence according to whatever logic they choose to make up on that given day (like you are here).
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:40 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Is the government in the thread with us right now Mr paranoid?
This place has been monitored heavily since 2008
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 11:41 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:41 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
This place has been monitored heavily since 2008
quote:
Registered on: 9/1/2014
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News