- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Where are the "No Kings" weirdos after the SCOTUS ruling?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:27 am
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:27 am
Get in here and explain this one....
(D)umbasses.
(D)umbasses.
4
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:31 am to Tigahs24Seven
Waiting on a paycheck before protesting
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:38 am to Tigahs24Seven
I’ll bite.
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:42 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
Legislate? Nahh. Just arbitrarily change the word "tax" to "penalty". Boom. Done.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:43 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Legislate? Nahh. Just arbitrarily change the word "tax" to "penalty". Boom. Done.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:46 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Legislate? Nahh. Just arbitrarily change the word "tax" to "penalty". Boom. Done.
This is probably why targeted sanctions coming down from the executive were always considered kosher.
It’s more difficult to call it a sanction when it’s just 10% across the board.
One scenario requires a target and rationale. The other is closer to just being an import tax.
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 11:41 am
Posted on 2/21/26 at 10:55 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
You missed my point...it wasn't about the right or wrong of the "why" in this ruling...its about the useful idiot fricksticks out in the streets repeating their cult's favorite mantra that Trump is a "King"...how does one explain the "King" being told to take his tariff toys and go home and look for a new tariff toy?
Where are those brainless parrots now to explain the No Kings ridiculousness.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:04 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:I agree that No Kings is ridiculous, but they will just say he is going to tariff nobody what anyone says.
You missed my point...it wasn't about the right or wrong of the "why" in this ruling...its about the useful idiot fricksticks out in the streets repeating their cult's favorite mantra that Trump is a "King"...how does one explain the "King" being told to take his tariff toys and go home and look for a new tariff toy?
Where are those brainless parrots now to explain the No Kings ridiculousness.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:18 am to Tigahs24Seven
Duh - their marches stopped the King!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News