Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Where Would the USMNT Rank in UEFA | Soccer Board
Started By
Message

Where Would the USMNT Rank in UEFA

Posted on 6/30/17 at 11:33 am
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
13746 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 11:33 am
If the USMNT played in UEFA where would they be? Not top 5-10, but top 20? Would they qualify for the Euros regularly, and if they did would they make it out of their group? Make it to the World Cup regularly?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 11:35 am to
#3.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88473 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 11:38 am to
Depends on the draw in the qualifiers. Would make the Euros most times now with the expanded field. Would be a chore to qualify for the WC. Would probably bat 50/50 on that.
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
12889 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 11:54 am to
If we were a United State sized country located in Europe then I'd think we'd be kinda, sorta good.
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39424 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:08 pm to
Russia says hi
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
13746 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:08 pm to
We've shown we can compete with Belgium and Portugal in meaningful games, guess I'm curious as to how we stack up to the mid-tier European teams and how we would do over an extended time playing them.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

We've shown we can compete with Belgium

We were luck to not be blown out by Belgium.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88473 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:12 pm to
We have played up in big spots but we also play down to our opponents at times as well. I think it would be a struggle most of the time.
Posted by mynamebowl
Houston
Member since Jun 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

If we were a United State sized country located in Europe then I'd think we'd be kinda, sorta good.


That's an interesting way of looking at it. Assuming that the demographics and all the other sporting advantages we have would be the same as they are now, and assuming soccer would be our one and only sport of note like the rest of Europe. The answer to the question is easy, we would dominate like no one in the sport ever has. Club and International levels.

quote:

Russia says hi


Land mass has nothing to do with why Russia sucks at everything.

ETA - I realize that my post has nothing to do with the point of the thread. Just wanted to have my fun with it
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39736 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

guess I'm curious as to how we stack up to the mid-tier European teams and how we would do over an extended time playing them


England/Switzerland tier. Not on the skill level of a France/Germany/Spain/Belgium but could consistently get results over time against the Czech Republic's and Croatias of the world- we'd be in the middle of that second tier with them below the elite countries, but not in the third tier

Germany
France
Italy
Belgium
Spain
Portugal
Netherlands

Croatia
England
USA
Switzerland
Czech Republic

Greece
Ukraine
Russia
Romania
Denmark
Austria
Poland
Ireland
Wales
Sweden
Serbia


Something along those lines in the tier sheet over the course of time, swapping a team or two here and there. This is all of course until we eventually become a world power, which will happen in the next century

This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 12:58 pm
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
12889 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:18 pm to
While I agree with you on pretty much all of that, I think Croatia would beat us 6(-ish) out of 10 times.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39736 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:26 pm to
Croatia is a weird one for me. They're like a middle class mans Belgium. Great individual talent, arguably the best midfield in the world, but don't get great results. They've only been eligible for 5 world cups. A third place finish, failure to qualify in South Africa, and three group stage exits.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
87291 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Something along those lines in the tier sheet over the course of time, swapping a team or two here and there. This is all of course until we eventually become a world power, which will happen in the next century



We'd be in the bottom tier. No way the US would beat any of those teams on a consistent basis. Look at Wales or Sweden, the US has never had the talent of a Bale or Ibrahimovic.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

the US has never had the talent of a Bale or Ibrahimovic

Thank God we play with 11 players.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39736 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:36 pm to
One superstar doesn't automatically make a team competitive. Greece won the Euros with a squad that doesn't have the overall talent of the current USMNT. Portugal won the euros this year and we're 2-2-2 against them all time, and the last match took a world class pass in the final seconds by one of the greatest players of all time to salvage a point. They haven't beaten us in two tries this century.

Granted they were all friendlies, we're 4-4 against Sweden and 1-0 against wales. Sure, we'd drop some games in that bottom tier, but I think we'd get more results than not.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88473 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

This is all of course until we eventually become a world power, which will happen in the next century


not until pay for play ends/is scaled way back and pro-rel is implemented
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
13746 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:43 pm to
Portugal beat a stacked France in the Euro finals last year without the GOAT.

I might be delusional but in 10 years Pulisic may very well be just as good as Bale is if he continues on his current track. He's already ahead of where Bale was at his age.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39736 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:44 pm to
soccer will be the benefactor of the sad but inevitable downfall of American football. Pro/Rel isn't the missing link for being competitive internationally, it's having a wider pool to draw from, which will happen as more and more parents push their kids away from football. There are countries with minuscule domestic leagues and minuscule populations that produce great national teams, because all the kids there play soccer

The pay to play will end when soccer is a big 3 sport. It's a niche sport right now
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
12889 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Croatia is a weird one for me.

Not to mention their own fans sabotage their games...
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88473 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Pro/Rel isn't the missing link for being competitive internationally


it will definitely help.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram