Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Back to some serious football talk. . .the ONE stat that worries me the most: | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message
locked post

Back to some serious football talk. . .the ONE stat that worries me the most:

Posted on 11/1/18 at 7:59 am
Posted by TigerFan244
Member since Jan 2012
3090 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 7:59 am
From ESPN: "LSU has scored on 92.1 percent of its red-zone trips (35-of-38), which is second in the SEC, but the Tigers are next-to-last in touchdown percentage down there (18-of-38)."

Thank God we have a kicker like Tracy, but all this talk about "explosive plays" is only going to help us between the 20s. We may be able to move the ball to the red zone - but Ensminger's play calling and the team's execution once they are there has been terrible. FGs aren't going to get it done VS Bama.

Hope Ensminger has been sleeping at the office every night for the last 2 weeks and working on RED ZONE OFFENSE!!!
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:05 am to
I wish I had a breakdown of this per game. As the field gets compressed, it is harder to move the ball. I wonder if the fact that LSU has played some very good defenses makes a big impact on TD production in the red zone.

UF
UM
MS State
AU
UGA

All have stronger Defenses than what most of those being compared to have faced. I'm not dismissing it. I just think there are sometimes Apples to Oranges comparisons
Posted by Paul Maul number 37
Member since Feb 2009
1111 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:13 am to
I think one factor in this is the reliability of Tracy. A SURE 3 points weighs heavily on red zone decisions.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139476 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:15 am to
quote:

All have stronger Defenses than what most of those being compared to have faced. I'm not dismissing it. I just think there are sometimes Apples to Oranges comparisons




Plus it's about the flow of the game and match ups that determines whether or not you can be successful on 4th down in the redzone. Against UGA the flow of the game, the OL/DL matchups and the fact that UGA did have a high powered offense coming into the game gave more credence to going for it on 4th down in the redzone which led to more touchdowns.

The opposite was true especially for MSU and UF. It was the accumulation of many little mistakes and turnovers that killed us in the UF game not the inability to score touchdowns in the redzone. In the MSU game the decisions were easy to take the field goals because MSU's offense was inept against our D and MSU's DL is probably the best we will see all season. In those situations you take the points.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:16 am to
Just FYI (Comparing to teams Bama has faced)

Here are the Top 6 Red Zone Defense Ranks

LSU:

La Tech (10) [118]
UGA (25) [75]
MS State (36) [25]
UF (62) [68]
AU (64) [61]
Miami (105) [94]


Bama:

Louisville (96) [73]
Ole Miss (114) [23]
Tenn (118) [120]
A&M (121) [6]
Mizzou (123) [113]
Arky (125) [57]


ETA: The first ranks were from JAN 2018 ( I only saw 2018 when I looked). The BOLD [xx] is current year rank)
This post was edited on 11/1/18 at 8:35 am
Posted by someLSUdoosh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2016
893 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:19 am to
quote:

La Tech (10)



Posted by Davelee4
Member since Oct 2018
25 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:20 am to
Hahaha!

LA TECH!

Gentlemen i wouldn't put much stock into those percentages.
This post was edited on 11/1/18 at 8:22 am
Posted by tigernation56
im the woods
Member since Feb 2013
4986 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:22 am to
ur on the wrong board baw
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Gentlemen i wouldn't put much stock into those percentages.


Nor I. I went to "2018" Rankings... BUT It was January 208!!


I am going to update my number on my other post. I will leave my frick-up and add [xx] as the CURRENT numbers


I apologize for the oversight
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
66974 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:27 am to
quote:

but Ensminger's play calling has been terrible.


Wrong.
This post was edited on 11/1/18 at 8:27 am
Posted by wheelz007
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2010
3386 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:28 am to
There is no denying we've struggled to get TD's down there, but -

We've been ahead in these games and getting 3 widens the lead. So I can see how having a lead with a great kicker can take a lot of urgency off of your offense once you get to the 33 yard line.

Posted by Wayne Kenoff
Member since Sep 2018
540 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:32 am to
I agree 100% with this which is why I, even as a diehard fan, still believe and expect LSU will lose this game. I'll hope we win and will probably have anxiety attacks during every single possession but I'm realistic as well. We have to score touchdowns to beat Bama; field goals won't cut it.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
73583 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:35 am to
quote:

I wonder if the fact that LSU has played some very good defenses
quote:

UM

Even the most crazy homers in Oxford would not categorize their defense this year as anything near "good".
This post was edited on 11/1/18 at 8:36 am
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Even the most crazy homers in Oxford would not categorize their defense this year as anything near "good".





UM is "tha U"...Miami. And, I give them credit for strong DL play
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
16667 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:40 am to
I think there are 2 factors. One, we lack a true bruising inside runner. We don't have a player that can grind out yards when the defense starts to pack it in. I was hoping Curry would be that guy, but he likely needs more time and our OL still hasn't solidified.

Second, we have not done a good job utilizing our size mismatch with our WRs. We should be able to eat defenses up with back shoulder fades. It's likely a combination of our WRs not correctly putting DBs on their hip and poor ball positioning by Burrow. He made one attempt vs Miss St I believe that was picked in the endzone and Burrow did not put the ball high enough and enough outside. The WR also didn't box the DB out well.
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
11405 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:42 am to
Burrow and the O-line will have to make some plays. As with most games against the gumps, the offense will have to pull its own weight
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48098 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:43 am to
quote:

All have stronger Defenses than what most of those being compared to have faced. I'm not dismissing it. I just think there are sometimes Apples to Oranges comparisons


We have played 1 top 30 opponents redzone scoring opportunities per game defense and they are 27th( miss st).

we have played 1 defense in the top 50 in opponents redzone scoring %
Posted by tmjones2
TX
Member since Feb 2013
1548 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:43 am to
I don't think LSU is going to be able to hand the ball off in the red zone successfully. You're going to either need Burrow to run it a little (which he certainly can) or find a way to throw it in there. Maybe toss a few up to that 7' WR of yours.
Posted by SEC Grapevine
SEC
Member since Sep 2014
502 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:48 am to
Posted by madddoggydawg
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
6684 posts
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:35 am to
We have some work to do in this area.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram