- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Should I drop Diggs
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:39 pm
For McLaurin or Chark?
PPR and my other WR’s are JuJu, T,Williams and E.Sanders.
PPR and my other WR’s are JuJu, T,Williams and E.Sanders.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:44 pm to GynoSandberg
I thought about it but he had 2 good games while Diggs had ............0
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:46 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
thought about it but he had 2 good games while Diggs had ............0
Good thing no one has ever turned around a slow start to the season.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:48 pm to wildtigercat93
Oh I know it can happen but I can’t wait all year lol
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:51 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
The Vikings have won two 20 point blowouts at home where they ran the ball 40 times. Schedule gets tougher.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 3:59 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
I thought about it but he had 2 good games while Diggs had ............0
Dont drop Sanders.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 4:31 pm to dj30
Three more tough matchups coming for Sanders and that offense is trash. Unless he’s traded he’s meh
Posted on 9/23/19 at 4:37 pm to GynoSandberg
The offense may be trash, but he went 11 for 98 and 1 against Chicago.
Are you in this guys league or something? That’s the only reason I can see to give him the advice to drop Sanders.
Are you in this guys league or something? That’s the only reason I can see to give him the advice to drop Sanders.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:02 pm to RB10
If he wants to add one of those guys I’d drop Sanders. If he doesn’t want to add them then keep sanders
Historically Flacco can barely sustain one WR. Likes to push it downfield (Sutton). Tough schedule coming up. Sanders isn’t going to win an 8-10 league especially when Juju Tyrell and Diggs are your other WR. I’m trying to get the splash lotto ticket guy
Historically Flacco can barely sustain one WR. Likes to push it downfield (Sutton). Tough schedule coming up. Sanders isn’t going to win an 8-10 league especially when Juju Tyrell and Diggs are your other WR. I’m trying to get the splash lotto ticket guy
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:08 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Sanders isn’t going to win an 8-10 league especially when Juju Tyrell and Diggs are your other WR. I’m trying to get the splash lotto ticket
Diggs and juju with Rudolph are though? I don’t think any of his WRs are winning him the league at this point, but sanders has been the best of the bunch.
Diggs has been terrible as the #2 in a run heavy offense and juju’s QB could barely complete a forward pass.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:13 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
Sanders was Flaccos clear #1 target in 2 of 3 games. He's still a much better big play and volume threat than Sutton.
Diggs is the #2 WR in a run heavy offense. He's a TD dependent flex.
PPR I put Sanders value much higher than Diggs. Their target totals this year won t even be close.
I think McLauren is a better player to have than Diggs. Pass heavy offense and he's the only real viable receiving threat.
That said I would trade Diggs for any possible need I can improve before flat dropping him.
I think he should be dropped for McLauren though. I had really high rankings on McLauren coming into the season.
If people had followed the Redskins camp closely he should have been drafted or added as a free agent before the season.
He definitely should be owned everywhere by now.
McLauren will finish the year as a top 20-30 WR
Diggs is the #2 WR in a run heavy offense. He's a TD dependent flex.
PPR I put Sanders value much higher than Diggs. Their target totals this year won t even be close.
I think McLauren is a better player to have than Diggs. Pass heavy offense and he's the only real viable receiving threat.
That said I would trade Diggs for any possible need I can improve before flat dropping him.
I think he should be dropped for McLauren though. I had really high rankings on McLauren coming into the season.
If people had followed the Redskins camp closely he should have been drafted or added as a free agent before the season.
He definitely should be owned everywhere by now.
McLauren will finish the year as a top 20-30 WR
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:14 pm to RB10
No, I literally just said sanders Juju Tyrell and Diggs aren’t gonna win your league ?
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:17 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
No, I literally just said sanders Juju Tyrell and Diggs aren’t gonna win your league ?
No, you said Sanders isn’t going to win your league while the others are on the roster, like another wide receiver would help.
I don’t think Chark or Mclaurin rather than Sanders changes that. You seem to disagree.
Your suggestion is to get rid of a high volume guy (Sanders) for a splash guy. Wouldn’t it be be better to get rid of an unproductive splash guy (Diggs) for another splash guy?
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:26 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
I’d try to hold on to diggs
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:29 pm to RB10
Are you being for serious?
This is throwing shade at all his WRs my dude. Team full of WR2s and WR3s. Odd thing to argue about
Ok, then you tell him to get rid of Diggs then
Minnesota was up 28 points on Atlanta in MIN and beat OAK by 20 in MIN. Two home romps, not forced to throw. These are atypical game scripts that develop run centric game plans. The one neutral game script saw Diggs getting looks. Had a TD called back on a bad penalty on top of the one he scored. I’m banking on more neutral game scripts and more looks for diggs
quote:
No, you said Sanders isn’t going to win your league while the others are on the roster, like another wide receiver would help.
quote:
Sanders isn’t going to win an 8-10 league especially when Juju Tyrell and Diggs are your other WR. I’m trying to get the splash lotto ticket
This is throwing shade at all his WRs my dude. Team full of WR2s and WR3s. Odd thing to argue about
quote:
Your suggestion is to get rid of a high volume guy (Sanders) for a splash guy. Wouldn’t it be be better to get rid of an unproductive splash guy (Diggs) for another splash guy?
Ok, then you tell him to get rid of Diggs then
Minnesota was up 28 points on Atlanta in MIN and beat OAK by 20 in MIN. Two home romps, not forced to throw. These are atypical game scripts that develop run centric game plans. The one neutral game script saw Diggs getting looks. Had a TD called back on a bad penalty on top of the one he scored. I’m banking on more neutral game scripts and more looks for diggs
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:36 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Ok, then you tell him to get rid of Diggs then
Telling him to drop any of those 4 is a bit insane, and the only person doing it is you. You usually have very good advice, this is not one of those times in my opinion.
ETA: Not even mentioning he’s listed 4 WRs like those are his only options to drop. I’m guessing there are much better drop candidates than any of his receivers.
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 5:49 pm to RB10
I’m just going with what was listed
Only put so much stock into past performances this early, the data isn’t sufficient. If Diggs bombs in a neutral game script I’d be selling him
I like mclaurin and Chark better than sanders ROS. I don’t believe that to be crazy. I don’t necessarily think it’s a huge gap. I just don’t like Flacco or that offense
Only put so much stock into past performances this early, the data isn’t sufficient. If Diggs bombs in a neutral game script I’d be selling him
I like mclaurin and Chark better than sanders ROS. I don’t believe that to be crazy. I don’t necessarily think it’s a huge gap. I just don’t like Flacco or that offense
Posted on 9/24/19 at 8:22 am to GynoSandberg
Thanks for the input. Didn’t mean to cause so much drama lol.
Popular
Back to top

5





