- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Posting this to see if this Anon makes the correct prediction.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:22 pm
Sounds plausible. Don't know about the timeline. In order to come true the effort for a second special counsel needs to start in earnest by October 22.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:24 pm to GumboPot
I'd have more faith if they spelled the AG's name correctly.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:24 pm to GumboPot
There should be a special counsel appointed, but for another reason
The Dems, FBI, CIA, and Obama administration illegally spying on TRUMP and his campaign
The Dems, FBI, CIA, and Obama administration illegally spying on TRUMP and his campaign
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:25 pm to GumboPot
Is this the 10/17 event uncle Joe was talking about?
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:25 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Is this the 10/17 event uncle Joe was talking about?
I have no idea.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:26 pm to GumboPot
It's plausible but if Barr doesnt step aside like Sessions did I dont know how effective a 2nd special counsel would be.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:28 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I have no idea.
Text JOE to 3303030003003330000 to find out
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:31 pm to airlinehwypanhandler
quote:
It's plausible
I say plausible because the Lawfare Group is in an all out war using the legal system to get Trump.
The Lawfare Group is the group of lawyers behind the scenes supporting Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi to get Trump.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:31 pm to GumboPot
Wouldn't one of the following need to occur?
1) Barr, himself, appoint a Special Counsel, or
2) Barr recuse and the Acting AG appoint a Special Counsel?
I don't see Barr doing either of those.
1) Barr, himself, appoint a Special Counsel, or
2) Barr recuse and the Acting AG appoint a Special Counsel?
I don't see Barr doing either of those.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:36 pm to BrookhavenBengal
quote:
Wouldn't one of the following need to occur?
1) Barr, himself, appoint a Special Counsel, or
2) Barr recuse and the Acting AG appoint a Special Counsel?
I don't see Barr doing either of those.
Apparently it can vary.
Ken Starr was appointed by a 3 judge panel from the DC Circuit that led to Clinton's impeachment.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:37 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
I'd have more faith if they spelled the AG's name correctly
Sorry that’s how I abbreviate it.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:38 pm to GumboPot
I don’t think the American people are up for another special counsel.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:38 pm to GumboPot
quote:
quote:
Wouldn't one of the following need to occur?
1) Barr, himself, appoint a Special Counsel, or
2) Barr recuse and the Acting AG appoint a Special Counsel?
I don't see Barr doing either of those.
Apparently it can vary.
Ken Starr was appointed by a 3 judge panel from the DC Circuit that led to Clinton's impeachment.
There are currently no regs on the books and the entire SC scam is guided by guidance documents. That would tend to make it less cut and dry than in the past.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:40 pm to rds dc
quote:
There are currently no regs on the books and the entire SC scam is guided by guidance documents. That would tend to make it less cut and dry than in the past.
You are right. And Ken Starr led an "Independent Counsel" which apparently was the terminology used in the law.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:40 pm to GumboPot
Qanon is wrong most of the time. Why people buy this ca ca is beyond me. They must be lacking nookie or something.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:42 pm to GumboPot
Only person that can appoint a special counsel is the AG.
Barr ain't doing that.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:43 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Ken Starr was appointed by a 3 judge panel from the DC Circuit that led to Clinton's impeachment.
Pursuant to the existing SC statute.
That statute no longer exists.
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:43 pm to GumboPot
The SC has to come for either the AG of Deputy AG. Doubt that is going to happen.
Reno and Congress changed the SC statue after the Clinton impeachment I believe.
Reno and Congress changed the SC statue after the Clinton impeachment I believe.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 10/16/19 at 4:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
Only person that can appoint a special counsel is the AG.
Barr ain't doing that.
That is how most people read the current guidance. While I put no stock in the Anons, it wouldn't surprise me if House Dems claimed they had authority to appointment a SC
Popular
Back to top


10







