- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can we compare Michael and Richardson?
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:24 pm
I just watched video on both running backs. Michael appears to be more of an all-purpose back and Richardson appears to be more of a north and south runner. It looks to me that we also have recruited a runner like Richardson in Ford. Michael, from the little I've seen, appears to have some decent hands and the ability to break a run on any play. Richardson may be rated higher, and I'm sure he's ab great back, but it looks to me that Michael would be a better fit within this recruiting class and within this system.
4
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:27 pm to Lando Calrissian
Michael is one of those pissed off I backs that can run north/south too.
Richardson is probably a tad more shifty, but Michael gets the tough yards, and can still make D Backs look stupid on angles.
Richardson is probably a tad more shifty, but Michael gets the tough yards, and can still make D Backs look stupid on angles.
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:28 pm to Lando Calrissian
Richardson is the better back.
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:30 pm to Lando Calrissian
Which back fits in our class would be a better debate as Lando brought up.
The LSU coaching staff is making it pretty well-known which back they think is better and want more.
The LSU coaching staff is making it pretty well-known which back they think is better and want more.
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:31 pm to Louie T
Why is Richardson the better back?
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:32 pm to Louie T
I agree that Richardson is better, but it isn't by much.
Richardson has more to his repertoire. Michael just likes punishing, but he has legit 4.4 speed.
Richardson has more to his repertoire. Michael just likes punishing, but he has legit 4.4 speed.
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:34 pm to Jim Jack and Aggies
Rich is the better back it appears but yes like you said Michael would be the better fit for LSU given that they already have Ford, and Pratt locked up.
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:39 pm to Lando Calrissian
quote:I'm judging this by offers, film, and what the LSU coaching staff and other experts are saying.
Why is Richardson the better back?
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:48 pm to Louie T
Well Michael is between us and A&M and will decide before the season. I say we go after him as much as possible and if we lose out there is still Richardson. But because Richardson is a Bama commit, I would go after the much better chance (CM).
Posted on 7/26/08 at 7:49 pm to Lando Calrissian
Barry Every seems to think Michael is the better of the two.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News