- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Should this trade be vetoed?
Posted on 10/21/21 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 10/21/21 at 2:02 pm
Dynasty League trade.
Team One gets
Tom Brady
Rob Gronkowski
Keenan Allen
1st Round Pick (2022)
2nd Round Pick (2022)
1st Round Pick (2023)
2nd Round Pick (2023)
Team Two gets
Joe Mixon
Josh Jacobs
Just curious.
Team One gets
Tom Brady
Rob Gronkowski
Keenan Allen
1st Round Pick (2022)
2nd Round Pick (2022)
1st Round Pick (2023)
2nd Round Pick (2023)
Team Two gets
Joe Mixon
Josh Jacobs
Just curious.
Posted on 10/21/21 at 2:05 pm to sertorius
No. But in my CCP league it would be legit
Posted on 10/21/21 at 2:12 pm to sertorius
No
this is a 100% fair trade
Mixon is worth a 1st +
Jacobs is worth a 2023 1st and 2023 2nd
The 2nds at this point are collateral
Gronk has no redeeming value
In SF, Brady has value
Mixon is worth a 1st +
Jacobs is worth a 2023 1st and 2023 2nd
The 2nds at this point are collateral
Gronk has no redeeming value
In SF, Brady has value
This post was edited on 10/21/21 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 10/21/21 at 3:14 pm to sertorius
It’s a shite trade but don’t veto it
Posted on 10/21/21 at 5:29 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
No this is a 100% fair trade
Dynasty league?
If team 2 quits the league, good fricking luck.
This post was edited on 10/21/21 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 10/22/21 at 2:27 pm to sertorius
Do you think they’re colluding?
If your answer is no, then no veto
If your answer is no, then no veto
Posted on 10/22/21 at 3:02 pm to sertorius
Team two must be stacked at RB. Still doesn't look vetoable.
Popular
Back to top
5







