- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin another j6 crybully won’t certify election
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to LSUpsychWARD
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to LSUpsychWARD
Good luck buddy.
0
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It seems giving him a bigger mandate possibly gives some hope (however slim) of nudging that along versus just an outright pointless fiction - at least to me it would.
I think it's mostly fiction and the DOGE stuff is coming off quite cringe.
It's a sign he didn't learn his less from admin vol. 1 with dealing with the APA and laws regarding dealing with the Executive. It largely neutered what good he tried.
He seems to be following the same path, again (just like big spending).
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And this is why they lie
You lie daily
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
democrats do not care about the law when it comes to DJT. This has been proven over and over again in real life.
LINK?
What Supreme Court ruling did they ignore?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not the exact words, but the identical message ....
There is no verification Raskin said those words in 2024.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:51 am to LSUpsychWARD
[embed]https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=Jamie%20Raskin%20Quote%20on%20Election%20Certification&mmscn=stvo&mid=BED65AA438F81B93801CBED65AA438F81B93801C&ajaxhist=0[/embed]
Jamie Raskin said, “Let folks cast their votes for Trump if that’s their choice. But mark my words, we won’t be certifying the election. He might win, but we’ll ensure he doesn’t step foot in the Oval Office.”
Raskin and the op
Jamie Raskin said, “Let folks cast their votes for Trump if that’s their choice. But mark my words, we won’t be certifying the election. He might win, but we’ll ensure he doesn’t step foot in the Oval Office.”
Raskin and the op
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:51 am to NC_Tigah
That was in February prior to the USSC ruling.
That's definitely been an echo in the chamber lately, though, regardless.
That's definitely been an echo in the chamber lately, though, regardless.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Would be funny if people storm the capitol again but this time because they won’t certify Trump’s win.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:52 am to The Boat
quote:
Would be funny if people storm the capitol again but this time because they won’t certify Trump’s win.
THAT would be some 8D Chess
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:54 am to LSUpsychWARD
He has said this for 2 months. Has he said it again recently?
They are the masters of projection.
So a handful of democrats in Congress will deny the voter's will in this country? Who exactly is destroying democracy?
They are the masters of projection.
So a handful of democrats in Congress will deny the voter's will in this country? Who exactly is destroying democracy?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:54 am to themunch
quote:
Jamie Raskin said, “Let folks cast their votes for Trump if that’s their choice. But mark my words, we won’t be certifying the election. He might win, but we’ll ensure he doesn’t step foot in the Oval Office.”
Which second in that video is the above quote stated?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:55 am to LSUpsychWARD
I was thinking that Adam Schiff should be the only Representative arrested after Trump is inaugurated, but I’ll make room in prison for this little shite stain as well.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:56 am to AlwysATgr
There is no difference in SFP and Raskin. Both very dishonest
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
He said it on Bill Maher. Is Jon Turley a smoothbrain too?
LINK
So who decides if its fair? There have been zero allegations of Republicans cheating... literally zero. So where does this "concern" come from? And was Trump wrong to assume cheating in 2020 when every election marker was flipped on its ear in the dark of night, yet Raskin is justified in these clear certification threats in the absence of any irregularity whatsoever?
LINK
quote:
“It’s going to be up to us on January 6th, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions.”
quote:
“When I say we will support a free and fair election, no, we we’re not going to allow them to steal it in the states, or steal it in the Department of Justice or steal it with any other election official in the country.
If it’s a free and fair election, we will do what we’ve always done. We will honor it.”
So who decides if its fair? There have been zero allegations of Republicans cheating... literally zero. So where does this "concern" come from? And was Trump wrong to assume cheating in 2020 when every election marker was flipped on its ear in the dark of night, yet Raskin is justified in these clear certification threats in the absence of any irregularity whatsoever?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Election deniers equal insurrectionists. They must be prosecuted according to the demwits.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:56 am to LSUpsychWARD
So treason, got it. If that’s what they try to do, hang them all in the public square.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:57 am to LSUpsychWARD
quote:
I googled “certify election” just to see who’s reported on this and of course every link is about how Trump and MAGA electorates wont certify… Thank god Elon bought Twitter.
Raskin was bragging about this on Maher on Friday, and given that Maher says the only two reasons he’s not voting Republican these days are Republicans not respecting election results and climate change (which even he admits there’s nothing we can do about it), shouldn’t Maher have lost his shite there?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:and?
That was in February prior to the USSC ruling.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:59 am to DawgCountry
quote:
There is no difference in SFP and Raskin. Both very dishonest
How is me pointing out a quote is made up being dishonest?
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News