- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Any reason this trade should have been vetoed?
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:46 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:46 am
Standard 12 team league, currently T3
I offer Dalvin, Hilton, and D. Thomas for Zeke.
Trade is accepted but vetoed by 4 members saying it was lopsided in my favor. Anyone ever experienced something like this?
Other pertinent info; my current RBs are Barkley, White, Cook, Ekeler
May revise this offer to another owner. Is Cook + Hilton for CMAC too much?
Keep in mind standard, not PPR
I offer Dalvin, Hilton, and D. Thomas for Zeke.
Trade is accepted but vetoed by 4 members saying it was lopsided in my favor. Anyone ever experienced something like this?
Other pertinent info; my current RBs are Barkley, White, Cook, Ekeler
May revise this offer to another owner. Is Cook + Hilton for CMAC too much?
Keep in mind standard, not PPR
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 11:16 am
9
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:06 am to CoachKlein
You are getting the better of it but it’s no way close to being vetoable
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:15 am to LSU-MNCBABY
This league has a history of taking it upon themselves to decide if certain trades make one team or another too good. Regardless of how fair the trades are.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:21 am to CoachKlein
Is the other team eliminated from the playoffs? Its not like Zeke is setting the world on fire.
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 7:23 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:36 am to CoachKlein
quote:
This league has a history of taking it upon themselves to decide if certain trades make one team or another too good. Regardless of how fair the trades are.
Leave the league.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:38 am to dj30
Other team is not eliminated from playoffs.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:52 am to CoachKlein
Stuff like this is why I hate the trade veto option. Outside of downright collusion, there's no valid reason for a 3rd party owner to veto a trade.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:03 am to bigjuice56
My work league is the same way. People get butthurt when good teams try to position themselves better for ROS.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:04 am to CoachKlein
Dalvin could definitely blow up and make this trade favor the other guy straight up without considering the other players, I don’t see a reason this should be vetoed. The people you play with suck
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:13 am to CoachKlein
In my league a guy offered a guy Odell and Julio for Gurley and it got vetoed.
The guy trying to get Gurley was 2-6 and in last place and the guy getting Julio and Odell was 4-4
The guy trying to get Gurley was 2-6 and in last place and the guy getting Julio and Odell was 4-4
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:18 am to Upperdecker
The more I look at it, Dalvin has a pretty favorable playoff schedule so it could work better for me in the end. I know Hilton has one of the toughest schedules left for WR.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:35 am to CoachKlein
TY has Houston, dallas, and giants in playoffs.
Not exactly a daunting schedule. Houston maybe but the other 2 not so much
Not exactly a daunting schedule. Houston maybe but the other 2 not so much
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:44 am to bulldog95
Hilton has the 3rd hardest playoff schedule for WR per FantasyPros. I do have Landry as an alternative if it could ever be justified playing Jarvis over Hilton.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 9:17 am to CoachKlein
I have to choose between
Landry
Hilton
Edelman
Kupp
Ross
Amendola
And then 1 of them or Mack in my flex
Landry
Hilton
Edelman
Kupp
Ross
Amendola
And then 1 of them or Mack in my flex
Posted on 11/8/18 at 10:03 am to ChadJones4Heisman
I'm fortunate the two leagues I'm in this isn't an issue. I don't think I could commit long-term to a league like that.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 10:04 am to CoachKlein
quote:
Trade is accepted but vetoed by 4 members saying it was lopsided in my favor. Anyone ever experienced something like this?
A trade being "lopsided" in one's favor is not something to veto. Bad trades happen. The league should not veto unless obvious collusion or if it's something so egregious that it would "break" the league
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:35 pm to CoachKlein
Fair trade. Should not have been vetoed.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 10:55 pm to CoachKlein
We had this same problem in my league this year. I sent this link to the group text and told them to go F themselves. Everyone apologized and we changed our rules to only veto if obvious collusion.
Send them this link, tell them to read it, and tell them to go F themselves.
LINK
Send them this link, tell them to read it, and tell them to go F themselves.
LINK
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News