- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL Week 5: Bye Weeks Begin....
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:17 pm to TigerPhan27
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:17 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
couldnt someone just keep adding and dropping players under 1 roster spot all day placing everyone on waviers until the next week? when you drop someone they go on the protected the list right? So say i pick up keith poole and drop mario bates then i pick up quinn early and drop keith poole two minutes later wouldnt that put keith poole and mario bates on wavers until the next week preventing anyone from picking them up in the current week? and if so couldnt someone with no life, lets call them sloflow, do this all day if they felt like it?
even on the protected list, they come free after 2 days. Someone would have to do this on a Friday or Saturday for it to work, and at that point if you dont have the players you want for that week, then it is just your fault.
and i know my other leagues on ESPN and YAhoo, when you add someone and drop them right after, they do not go on waivers. they are free agents still. not sure how this league is.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:17 pm to reddman
I've never been one to "blame the refs" for losing but I was really close to seeing a point in that yesterday when they called the BS roughing on Cam. With that being said my point that I was made came true, if you are good enough you can overcome a bad call and their are other reasons why you lost if you did which could have been settling for too many FG's, Drew's pick, giving up a 69 yard option, etc.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:18 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
i pick up keith poole and drop mario bates then i pick up quinn early and drop keith poole
GLORY DAYS!
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Someone would have to do this on a Friday or Saturday for it to work, and at that point if you dont have the players you want for that week, then it is just your fault.
Wasnt it friday that you "supposedly" were trying to pick up SF?
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:21 pm to rondo
couldnt it be "just your fault" too when you dont know the rules or drop players without paying attention? just saying
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:22 pm to rondo
FWIW Marle I am inclined to call BS on your "I was going to pick up SF but couldnt because they were a protected free agent"
I am not seeing that SF was ever on any roster in our conference this year.
I am not seeing that SF was ever on any roster in our conference this year.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:22 pm to TigerPhan27
TBM are never at fault Big Knock
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:23 pm to rondo
quote:
Wasnt it friday that you "supposedly" were trying to pick up SF?
no, it was actually Sunday morning
and people could have blocked them even if there is a 4 transaction limit.
the thing is i had an active defense already, i just wanted to switch.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:23 pm to rondo
He couldnt pick them up because he reached his add drop limit.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:25 pm to rondo
quote:
FWIW Marle I am inclined to call BS on your "I was going to pick up SF but couldnt because they were a protected free agent"
SF wasn't the protected free agent i wanted to pick up.
I wanted to add a protected Free agent on Thursday that was dropped on Wednesday which was a position player, not SF D.
When Sunday rolled around i had a bad feeling about ATL D against GB, so I wanted to pick up a defense as well. I had my sights on SF at this point.
2 different attempts to add 2 different players.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:25 pm to reddman
He reached his limit because he tried to pick up "keith poole" but ol Keith was a Protected FA so it just dropped Bradford.
he comes back after the fact to say it just so happens "keith Poole" was really a defense that went bonkers.
Doesnt add up IMO
he comes back after the fact to say it just so happens "keith Poole" was really a defense that went bonkers.
Doesnt add up IMO
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:25 pm to reddman
Lulz at smith for challenging that.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:25 pm to rondo
frick Lovie for not going for the FG there.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:26 pm to reddman
He's letting his hubris cloud his judgement
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:26 pm to rondo
quote:
TBM are never at fault Big Knock
Well, show me something in the rules explaining how that works and I'll admit i did something wrong. I could almost guarantee that TDFL last year was not like this.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:26 pm to GynoSandberg
This game is going well.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:26 pm to Lester Earl
it came across earlier today like SF was who you were trying to pick up when the Bradford fiasco happened
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:27 pm to rondo
glad i bet the under for this shite fest
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:28 pm to rondo
i wrote this sunday morning
apology accepted.
quote:
i didnt need the guy i was talking about yesterday, but i want to pick up a defense today.
apology accepted.
Popular
Back to top


1





