Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us EDIT: NCAA Rulebook explains why INT return was a (EDIT 2) Mess | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: EDIT: NCAA Rulebook explains why INT return was a (EDIT 2) Mess

Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:33 pm to
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49231 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

The refs did get that call correct.


No they didn't. They screwed the pooch when they blew the ball dead when it was live in the endzone.
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
4012 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:34 pm to
The whistle was blown because it was called a TD thus making it a dead ball
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
4012 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:35 pm to
Watch the play again, was called a TD and overturned.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21973 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

They screwed the pooch when they blew the ball dead when it was live in the endzone.


The ref at the goaline obviously didn't see it as a fumble because he signaled TD. That's why they have replay to begin with.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:37 pm
Posted by mdtiger1
Great Northwest Louisiana
Member since Jan 2005
1435 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:36 pm to
It wound up being enforced as an inadvertent whistle. The whistle blew when the side man signaled TD therefore the ball is played from a spot determined by the possessing teams wish. Of course, Iowa wanted it at the last spot of possession. The whistle killed the ball while loose.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

This happened in the TCU Texas tech game and was called as a touchback and given to the other team.

I'm pretty sure that one was called the same way

I remember that being a horribly officiated game as well. I wonder if it was the same crew
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 6:59 pm
Posted by JustSmokin
Member since Sep 2007
9162 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:02 pm to
They need to change the rule to say: Any dumbass who drops the ball before crossing the goal line will cost his team the possession.

Seen way too many of these plays recently. Can't comprehend how this happens.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:11 pm to
So u agree that this crew was Terrible right?
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56893 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

It wound up being enforced as an inadvertent whistle. The whistle blew when the side man signaled TD therefore the ball is played from a spot determined by the possessing teams wish. Of course, Iowa wanted it at the last spot of possession. The whistle killed the ball while loose.
Posted by Informer
Member since Jun 2004
1005 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:40 pm to
The play was ruled correctly. Ball is brought back to the point of the fumble, which was the 1 yardline. Also saw this exact same play earlier this year, ruled the same way. Don't recall the game.

The following is directly from the 2013 NCAA instant replay case book.

125. Fumble at a goal line
First and goal on the B-5. A22 runs to B’s goal line, loses the ball prior to
it breaking the plane of the goal line, and the officials rule touchdown.
The ball comes to rest in the end zone with no player attempting to
recover it. Ruling: Reviewable play, regarding whether A22 scored
a touchdown before he lost the ball. Reverse to no score, A 2-Goal on
B-1. If the ball becomes dead in the end zone with no team possessing
it, the ball is placed at the spot of the fumble. If the ball is dead in the
field of play, the ball is placed at that spot (Rule 12-3-1-a and 12-3-3-d).
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 7:43 pm
Posted by Dirty Pierre
West Chimes St
Member since Sep 2011
745 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

They need to change the rule to say: Any dumbass who drops the ball before crossing the goal line will cost his team the possession.


I agree. I do not see any reason why the team making this stupid mistake should get the ball back. Bad rule!
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138309 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

the officials rule touchdown.
the play is dead at this point, correct?

therefore, not sure what

quote:

If the ball becomes dead in the end zone with no team possessing it, the ball is placed at the spot of the fumble.
has to do with anything. as i understand it, nothing after the touchdown call would have mattered since it was a dead ball. LSU could have recovered and it would not have mattered since it was a dead ball. is my thinking incorrect?

Posted by Informer
Member since Jun 2004
1005 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

has to do with anything. as i understand it, nothing after the touchdown call would have mattered since it was a dead ball. LSU could have recovered and it would not have mattered since it was a dead ball. is my thinking incorrect?


Had LSU picked up the ball immediately, it would have been LSU's ball at the 20. Had an Iowa player picked it up, it would have been a TD. An immediate recovery after an erroneous TD signal is part of the review process and is reversible.

This also happened in the TCU/Texas Tech game earlier this year. It was ruled the same way, correctly.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 7:51 pm
Posted by Rabid Tiger
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2003
3694 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

None of this explains why the Refs blew a play dead when the ball was live and clearly in bounds and live and not in possession of a player from either team.


As it happened live, it was called a TD, which signifies the end of play.

It wasn't determined that the ball should've been alive until after the review was called. If an LSU player had picked the ball up in the replay, it would've been a touchback, as the refs ruled the TD reversed, thereby making everything after the "ref signaling TD" as fair play/or ball still in play.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 7:54 pm
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138309 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Had LSU picked up the ball immediately, it would have been LSU's ball at the 20. Had an Iowa player picked it up, it would have been a TD. An immediate recovery after an erroneous TD signal is part of the review process and is reversible.
i can work with this. thanks so much
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35873 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:54 pm to
That ref's sole job on that play was to ensure that the runner crossed the goal line with possession of the ball. He failed miserably.

That plus his complete miss of Jennings being tackled while attempting to stop the return essentially meant that he was being a spectator.

Good job dumbass.

I wish the broadcast both would call these jackasses out more often.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49231 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:56 pm to
IMO this rule needs to be looked at long and hard. I understand the reasoning with the immediacy and how it is part of the rule. But that is kind of open to interuptitation. Define immediate? The only fair thing in a situation like this would for it to be a touchback.
Posted by Rabid Tiger
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2003
3694 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

That ref's sole job on that play was to ensure that the runner crossed the goal line with possession of the ball. He failed miserably.

That plus his complete miss of Jennings being tackled while attempting to stop the return essentially meant that he was being a spectator.



Good job dumbass.


The play is pretty bang bang. He's running at the same time....I think it's pretty hard to catch everything with everything going on.

Dude totally botched Jennings getting held though.


This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49231 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 7:59 pm to
Rewarding the fumbling team the ball in such a situation basically lets 2 people off the hook for their combined mistakes. The premature TD signal by the official and the fumble by the runner.
Posted by coonass27
shreveport
Member since Mar 2008
3855 posts
Posted on 1/1/14 at 8:01 pm to
Yeah yeah. frick that noise, I'm still trying to figure out how the frick the ref didn't pull the flag on the 10 when Jennings was being arse raped by the lineman. He had his shoulder pad and then 2 hand gulls of jerseys from the back.

And there were signaled touchdowns buy the refs. The same ref that watched Jennings get held signaled the TD
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram