Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us How would Charles Scott have done with this OL play? | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: How would Charles Scott have done with this OL play?

Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82785 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

i remember he would go down after the slightest contact.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82785 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

What's that mean again?

If
I
Recall
Correctly
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82785 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

I think Ridley has turned into a hell of a back,
Indeed.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11959 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:51 pm to
Scott couldn't see the field as well as ridley can. He ran tough but he had to he did not follow blocks very well. Further I'm not convinced that he was a "step faster".
Posted by philter
Member since Dec 2004
8971 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:58 pm to
I don't think they are similar at all.
Posted by ODanMan
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2008
1655 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 6:59 pm to
IMO if scott would have lost about 10 lbs he would have been a much better back. he seemed a bit over weight
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121158 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:02 pm to
From reading this thread you'd swear 2008 was a decade ago, I'd take Chuck Scott each and every day over Ridley.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I'd take Chuck Scott each and every day over Ridley.


that's obvious brah. Anyone who wouldn't is fooling themselves
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82785 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:05 pm to
His legend was tainted by the worst OL in LSU history.
Posted by LSUtiger17
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
3092 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

especially coming from Single A Trinity Episcopal. He must have terrorized those 180 pound D-linemen back in the day.

Or this 165lb safety 4 years ago. I, as well as several others, been preaching about his quick feet, amazing vision, and hard-nosed running since 2008. Apparently, because I was small and white, his runs weren't impressive, but finally people are starting to realize his ability. He made me look like a fool, and while I wasn't a pro, I am willing to bet he would've made any other LHSAA player look just as bad as he made me, or an SEC linebacker, look. There are still a lot of people who don't realize how good he is, and I'm fully expecting even more to jump on the Ridley bandwagon from the "he is slow, recruited as a fullback, played small whiteboys, go Ford" bandwagon.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62218 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

His legend was tainted by the worst OL in LSU history.


Only in '09. That '08 OL was pretty good.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82785 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Only in '09. That '08 OL was pretty good.
If 09's offense played like this one, Scott would be an LSU legend.

He nearly was based on 08 alone.
Posted by jm3
Member since Jul 2010
1459 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:22 pm to
I think they're two different types of backs. Scott is more of an i-formation, downhill back and while i initially thought ridley would be similar, he has proven to be a very, very good spread back. The plays ridley makes out of the zone reads i'm not so sure Scott could have done as easily. Scott was one hell of a rb during his time here, and would still be today. I just think they fit different schemes
Posted by Common sence
Gilbert ,Az
Member since Nov 2009
1013 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:30 pm to
Scott can't cut like Ridley.
Posted by Broham
Member since Feb 2005
19123 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 7:30 pm to
I'll take Ridley.
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 10/8/10 at 8:49 am to
Stevan is a true tailback. Better than Scott in every way.
Posted by Ninja Looter
Member since Sep 2008
1848 posts
Posted on 10/8/10 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Stevan is a true tailback. Better than Scott in every way.


I concur. I couldn't stand watching Charles Scott run. His average rush would be him putting his head down and running directly into an offensive lineman.
Posted by lacajun
north La,
Member since Feb 2010
44 posts
Posted on 10/8/10 at 10:47 am to
imo Scott was better....he had no blocking last year and ran the same 2 or three plays all the frickn time (OC)...its bad when you can listen to the radio and know what play they gonna run.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 10/8/10 at 10:51 am to
both are powerful backs that can deceive you with a move, that TD run against Tenn was all Ridley powering it in, he got no help from the line!
This post was edited on 10/8/10 at 10:52 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49335 posts
Posted on 10/8/10 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I love Ridley, but Scott was very similar and a step faster, iirc.


I hope you aren't serious.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram