Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us I still miss Jamarcus | Page 18 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: I still miss Jamarcus

Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:10 am to
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12744 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Joey, you staying the night at Nuts house?
Yup, that didn't even occur to me.

***NOTE: The last few "NutsforLSU" posts were actually "King Joey"***

Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:32 am to
quote:

I still miss Jamarcus
I think this thread is a slap (unintentional or not) at Flynn. LSU struggled mightily when Flynn left, not at all when Russell left.

Year prior to Flynn, 0 championships. Flynn, 2 championships. Year after Flynn, no championships.

Year before Flynn, 2 losses. Flynn, 2 losses. Year after Flynn, 5 losses.

Year before Flynn, 438 points scored. Flynn, 541 point scored. Year after Flynn, 402 points scored.

If this year has made us miss a Quarterback, we shouldn't have to jump past a BCSCG MVP to find one to miss, should we?



Since some fans are hung up on stats maybe a closer scrutiny is in order. ;)

Points scored:
06- 438
07- 541
08- 402

LSU scored over a hundred points more in 07 than in 06 yet we had lost three first round draft choices off the offense of the 06 team. All were skill offensive players.

The 08 team scored only thirty-six less points than the 06 team yet everyone will concede that quarterback was the problem.
In 08 we had two of the top receivers back, the same OL as 07, with another years experience, and according to some, a better running back and a great fullback.
Flynn, Hester, and Doucet were the missing offensive players off the 08 team and production dropped over a hundred points.
Yet the 07 team was nothing special?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:38 am to
quote:

LSU scored over a hundred points more in 07


i'm sure the 58 points against la tech, and the two 3 OT games had nothing to do with that...
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18702 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:43 am to
JR wasn't the smartest QB that ever was. He's having a hard time adjusting to pro ball.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49356 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:48 am to
quote:

LSU scored over a hundred points more in 07 than in 06 yet we had lost three first round draft choices off the offense of the 06 team. All were skill offensive players.


Thats wonderful and all, but . . .

JR was responsible for 29 TDs in 2006 = 179 points

Flynn was responsible for 24 TDs in 2007 = 144 points.

Why does Flynn get credit for a great running game?

Also, 2007 had an extra game (21 points) and 6 OT periods (32 points).

So this really doesn't tell me a whole lot.

Disclaimer: I love Matt Flynn.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:49 am to
quote:

JR wasn't the smartest QB that ever was. He's having a hard time adjusting to pro ball.


and yet he made less mistakes than flynn...

weird!
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Why does Flynn get credit for a great running game?


if JR had the 2007 running game, LSU would not have lost a game in 2007, much less two to unranked teams.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18702 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:53 am to
quote:

and yet he made less mistakes than flynn...
JR was no better or worse than Flynn, Mauck, Davey, or any other productive QB we've had. To argue this is stupid.
This post was edited on 5/1/09 at 8:56 am
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12744 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Also, 2007 had an extra game (21 points) and 6 OT periods (32 points).
2007 also had twice as many ranked opponents (8). People tend to forget that one reason those four road games in '06 were such a pain in the arse is because the rest of the schedule was practically a cakewalk: 8 home games, all against unranked teams. It was a primrose path to an undefeated season with four anti-tank mines in the way.

Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:58 am to
quote:

if JR had the 2007 running game, LSU would not have lost a game in 2007, much less two to unranked teams.


If Flynn had the 2006 Wide Receivers that JR had, LSU would not have lost a game in 2007. Not that it mattered anyway.

This post was edited on 5/1/09 at 9:02 am
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 8:59 am to
quote:

JR was no better or worse than Flynn, Mauck, Davey, etc. To argue this is stupid.


well, in reality, someone has to be better than the other one.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18702 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 9:07 am to
quote:

well, in reality, someone has to be better than the other one.
Fair enough. How about JR was better than Lee.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7738 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 10:25 am to
"JR was no better or worse than Flynn, Mauck, Davey, or any other productive QB we've had. To argue this is stupid."

WHat?? I am not a big fan of these threads b/c people tend to disparage (often irrationally) excellent LSU players to make their points. BUT how can you say that it is stupid to argue that JR was better than Flynn et al? JR won the freaking Manning Award as the best QB in the nation AND was the #1 pick in the draft. That he was better than other LSU QB's is at least an arguable point!

By the way, I have no dog in this JR/Flynn fight. I think JR was better than Flynn but tend to think the margin, at least as a college player, was not as great as many of the very pro-JR folks assert. For what it's worth, my favorite LSU QB in my lifetime was Rohan Davey.
Posted by bently78
lafayette
Member since Jan 2008
128 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 10:29 am to
this is the great thing about college football, players come and ago and if they are special, they will be remebered forever
Posted by bayoubengal4life
North of tha lake
Member since Oct 2006
1088 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 11:42 am to
quote:

quote:


JR wasn't the smartest QB that ever was. He's having a hard time adjusting to pro ball.




and yet he made less mistakes than flynn...

weird!


actually he made just as many if you count fumbles. not saying that meant he was dumb, just saying he turned the ball over an equal number of times and that you can't use that argument. and a fumble in the backfield usually results in better field position for the opponent compared to a int thrown downfield. unless of course you are JL and the pick goes for six.
Posted by mlttiger
Member since Feb 2009
3974 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 11:55 am to
Why you can't trust stats

Player A:

QB rating- 115.70
Yards- 1873
Completion %- 53.2
Touchdowns-13
Y/A- 6.96
INT-16

Player B:
QB rating- 108.99
Yards- 1749
Completion %- 52.7
Touchdowns- 7
Y/A- 6.83
INT- 13

Player A had 269 attempts compared to Player B's 256

So based on stats, pick your QB
Posted by Tiger Roux
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
5020 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 12:02 pm to
A
Posted by mlttiger
Member since Feb 2009
3974 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 12:03 pm to



I'm going to wait to see if anybody else wants to guess, before I bias the reader with the answer
This post was edited on 5/1/09 at 12:06 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Why you can't trust stats

Player A:

QB rating- 115.70
Yards- 1873
Completion %- 53.2
Touchdowns-13
Y/A- 6.96
INT-16

Player B:
QB rating- 108.99
Yards- 1749
Completion %- 52.7
Touchdowns- 7
Y/A- 6.83
INT- 13

Player A had 269 attempts compared to Player B's 256

So based on stats, pick your QB


well stafford was bad as a freshman, i don't think anyone would argue that

lee was also bad as a freshman, and was put in a bad situation

they were both shitty
This post was edited on 5/1/09 at 12:14 pm
Posted by mlttiger
Member since Feb 2009
3974 posts
Posted on 5/1/09 at 12:13 pm to
fine since its been revealed, A is Lee and B is Stafford, both freshman year

well people still thought he was a great QB, and was going to turn around the program, but all I'm saying is that being a QB isn't all about stats
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram