Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Jefferson vs. Lee Inside the Numbers *Updated* | Page 11 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Jefferson vs. Lee Inside the Numbers *Updated*

Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Lee hasn't sucked all year what are you talking about?


He's only had 25 attempts and 1 INT. I'm referencing his career - the only numbers over time. Not 1 game where he was intercepted and made several terrible decisions. Like I said I'm not advocating for either QB - I just think the attention should be on the terrible head coach.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Also, your statement about Lee having a 16 play drive to score helps out Lee. If you can take time off of the clock while methodically driving down the field and manage to and the series with a score, you are doing what is best for your team. I would much rather a 16 play scoring drive success than a fluke ONE play score. These are x-factors that skew the avg yards per play argument.


I'm just saying you will almost never see a 16 play drive. Most of the reason it was 16 plays is that we had to go for it two 4th downs. You have to go for it on two fourth because you aren't efficient enough to pick it up in 3 downs.

There's two ways to look at it.

Lee got us down the field and deserves all the credit for his balls on that 4th down drive.

But it doesn't make JJ's contributions worthless.
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Anyone can manipulate numbers.

Dude... That's exactly what youre doing


[/quote] JJ was on the field for 2 TDs. Lee was on the field for 0.[/quote]

Jj wouldn't have gotten us in a position to score... Lee did. When lee drives all the way down to scoring distance and they put Jj in for 2 plays, one of which was a handoff, does not mean Jj caused that touchdown in any way
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
172179 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

First, Jefferson can throw. He has had three horrible games.


He has had 4 horrible games

That's 4/5

If he could throw, sooner or later the numbers would average out. He's regressed.
quote:


Second, if defenses are stacking the box, it is not working against Jefferson. Moreover, it apparently hasn't seemed to work all season because LSU is ranked 33rd in rushing against all BCS opponents.


So the credit goes to Ridley and the offensive line. JJ doesn't get credit for Ridley's success. That's stupid.
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

He had a very good o-line in 2008.

chyea right
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Jefferson, in his 3rd year, is making Lee, in his 1st year, look like Joe fricking Montana.
Uhhh . . . Lee is in his Fourth year.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

and JL has a WAY faster release than JJ does. so by that logic JL should be starting.


It's not release speed idiot - it's decision making speed - they both are terrible decision makers.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
8359 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:28 pm to
Stop crediting Jefferson with ridleys numbers, this is getting a little silly. A simple handoff can be done by Keke. More importantly, JJ's play action is uneffective while JL's actually made the secondary bite...
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

If you can take time off of the clock while methodically driving down the field and manage to and the series with a score, you are doing what is best for your team.
Except that we didn't have time to take off the clock.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

What plays were those? and if you say the 47 yd pass is "one of those plays that doesnt happen very often" you are right that long passes dont happen very often, but who are you to say they dont happen for LEE when hes only had 25 passing attempts this season compared to Jefferson's 80+ In 1/4 of the attempts Lee has 1/2 of Jefferson's passing yards. you dont spread a defense with an option that constantly goes for 2 yards when the Defense stacks the box. Why do they stack the box, because there is no threat of a passing game.



I'm not trying to be a dick, I just honestly don't know what you are referencing. There's like 20 people coming at me with questions, hard to keep up with them all.

If JJ isn't spreading the defense with the option, then something else appears to be, because we've run the ball extremely well with him at the helm.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Uhhh . . . Lee is in his Fourth year.


I think he was referencing Lee's first year (2008) v. JJs 2010.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Uhhh . . . Lee is in his Fourth year.


Uhhhh . . . it was a response to someone comparing JJ to '08 Lee dumb arse. BTW, Lee looks better than JJ so what's your point.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Stop crediting Jefferson with ridleys numbers, this is getting a little silly. A simple handoff can be done by Keke. More importantly, JJ's play action is uneffective while JL's actually made the secondary bite...



NOt really.

Actually, one of the big argument last year that JJ took blame for was that he couldn't operate the run game as well as Flynn (despite the fact that his rate passing stats exceeded Flynn's).

I think that's a fair assessment, when coupled with our porous OL.

There's more to operating a run game than simply handing the ball off.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Except that we didn't have time to take off the clock.




Uhhhh wrong. the drive started with 5:Something
on the clock.

That's alot of time.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

But in the case of what was being argued 16 plays makes 1 plays look embarrassing when it wasn't.
A 16 play drive is not exactly a good thing. the reason they are so rare is because that means an offense lacked the ability to make a big play and had to slowly move down the field in small chunks. honestly, that's not a good way to build an offense. Big plays are good things, and most scoring drives involve either A) good field position or B) a play of over 20 yards. Usually both.

a 64-yard, 16-play TD drive is better than the alternative, but it's not as great as a data point as some are making it out to be. That's an average of 4 yards per play, which is pretty low, particularly for a scoring drive.

And, full disclosure, I think Lee should absolutely, positively start and get at least 75% of the snaps, and I wouldn't be opposed to 100%. But I really dislike dishonest arguments.

The more plays in a drive, the better, is an absurd claim.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
26606 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Good juke, but cmon

How many points was lsu favored in this game?

17?



Oh, I know that... First of all, I'd like what some of these betting people and odds makers are smoking because I was sure we weren't coming close to beating them by that much.

And I know our passing game sucks and we have too many penalties, but it was still a nice move and good run. He runs funny though...but covers a lot of ground with those long legs.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
172179 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:32 pm to
quote:


There's more to operating a run game than simply handing the ball off.



Since you're such the football expert perhaps you can explain to us exactly what Jefferson does that makes him so masterful at orchestrating our running attack.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

RBWilliams8




Okay, I'll answer this for the 5th time since people obviously don't understand the context.

A guy posted saying "JJ was on the field for 3 turnovers... Lee for 1."

I said anyone can manipulate the numbers because JJ was not responsible for Peterson's fumble.

Just as he was not really responsible for the game winning TD. But if you go by "who was on the field..." it was JJ.
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

JL still has a better more professional drive; that killed the clock and put is in position to score.
LSU wasn't trying to kill the clock. LSU was behind by four points.

And getting a delay of game penalty on 4th down which backed LSU up and caused LSU to waste a very valuable timeout was not "professional."
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/6/10 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Since you're such the football expert perhaps you can explain to us exactly what Jefferson does that makes him so masterful at orchestrating our running attack.


Audibles out of bad plays.

He's audibled Ridley into big runs at least 5 times this year.

Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram