Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Keiland Problems? | Page 24 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Keiland Problems?

Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
289586 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

he started the game at RB and went onto carry the ball 17 times that night


He didnt start. Vincent started that game

quote:

UT was the game where he became the starter


thats what I said
Posted by GeauxWarrior12
Hammond
Member since Jan 2007
2804 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

without keiland starting, we don't win our last 2 games against good teams in 2006. he transformed our offense


I agree. If KW would have been ready for the first game we would have had a much easier time throwing the football.
Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21820 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

very little makes me think that UF and LSU weren't the 2 best teams in 2006


that would've been 1 hell of a game!
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8152 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

seems like he had a tweaked ankle if I remember right...I don't think it was just the fact that they wanted Vincent to play on senior night


Yeah, I wondered about that because I checked the participation report from that game and he didn't even get into the game.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470881 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

He didnt start. Vincent started that game

for 1 play?

our 2nd play of the game was keiland running

LINK

Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

did we win or lose these games?


After Football regulation time of 60 minutes it was Tied. But adhering to the newer rules we lost. 74? minutes
This post was edited on 8/9/08 at 5:48 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470881 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

After Football regulation time of 60 minutes it was

that wasn't the question

quote:

But adhering to the newer rules we lost.

twice

the same # as 2006
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
289586 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

for 1 play?

our 2nd play of the game was keiland running




So like I said, he didnt start.


he didnt go into the game as a starter. That was the game he broke some nice runs, and they stuck with him as the hot hand.

Do you really think they went into the game saying "we are going to get KW 17 carries"?
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22351 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:49 pm to
I heard he eats small children, maybe thats it
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36674 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

After Football regulation time of 60 minutes it was Tied. But adhering to the newer rules we lost. 74? minutes
Ok? If we followed the old rules, USC would have won the title in 03.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I agree. If KW would have been ready for the first game we would have had a much easier time throwing the ball.
KW keeps a D honest, they can't blitz like they wanna, because you can throw to him coming out of the backfield for a big gain, which is why if he was #1 like ya'll said at the end of the season, doesn't he start this past season, oh, well, water under you know what.
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8152 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:51 pm to

quote:

tweaked ankle


You nailed it...page 6.

LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470881 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Do you really think they went into the game saying "we are going to get KW 17 carries"?

why did he get our first carry of the game?
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

had we beaten AU that SECCG would have been maybe the best pairing of teams in history

Wow! You sure were not talking this way about LSU's 2006 season while it was actually happening. You said at the tiem LSU sucked at the time. What's with the new found Love of 2006?
quote:

very little makes me think that UF and LSU weren't the 2 best teams in 2006


Unbelievable. You were calling JV & Broussard "Fat Asses" & all the white guys of course sucked. etc.
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36674 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

You said at the tiem LSU sucked at the time.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470881 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

You sure were not talking this way about LSU's 2006 season while it was actually happening.

b/c we lost to AU and we shouldn't have

quote:

Unbelievable. You were calling JV & Broussard "Fat Asses"

alley? yes

JV? no. i've always defended my boy

Posted by MikeTheTigerVI
Tiger Den
Member since Jul 2007
695 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:01 pm to
Says CosmicDungo!!!

Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

"DON'T MAKE A MISTAKE, PLAY THE UPPERCLASSMEN" mode


Funny, I bet most if not all LSU fans would love to have an upperclassman QB right now..
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

and had the same # of losses as 2007 with a much harder schedule


Virginia Tech..
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470881 posts
Posted on 8/9/08 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Funny, I bet most if not all LSU fans would love to have an upperclassman QB right now..

not if that QB was sean glennan or michael hennig
Jump to page
Page First 22 23 24 25 26 ... 37
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 24 of 37Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram