- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Omg we would destroy oregon
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:34 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:34 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Bama
You mean the Bama defense that let Arkansas, Florida, and South Carolina move the ball up and down the field on them?
Thank you Antonio. These people are dumb.
0
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:36 pm to The Future
quote:
I think we could blow them out
yea, and I could shite tomorrow. i don't know, it might happen. Bottom line is, they run what they run, and no one stops it.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:37 pm to The Mick
quote:
Oregon would kill us IMO.
don't be a vag, our d line would crush anything behind the line of scrimmage
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:38 pm to offdacorner
Long as jj plays we aren't destroying anyone
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:38 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
We would shut down the run ike we did Ga Tech's even more impressive '08 offense and make Thomas pass his way to win.
And PP7 & Co would have a field day.
I think we could stop them much better than almost any other team. But I think we'd have some serious problems with not being able to sub guys. We sub a lot of guys on D and they move at lightning speed at times on offense. I could see certain guys getting worn out and out of place because we couldn't sub them in time.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:39 pm to dreaux
I know many would disagree with this, but you're basically watching WVU man for man, with 1 better reciever and a slightly better offensive line, who doesn't ever seem to get called for holding when its obvious.
If these two teams played, it would be a shoot out. Who cares though? We open against Oregon next year.
If these two teams played, it would be a shoot out. Who cares though? We open against Oregon next year.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:39 pm to Cornholio
quote:
yea, and I could shite tomorrow. i don't know, it might happen. Bottom line is, they run what they run, and no one stops it.
You didn't respond to my schedule post. Quit drinking the ESPN kool-aid. They run what they run and none of the shitty teams they have played have stopped it. The Stanford win is the only one on that list that actually catches my eye, even though Stanford themselves were/are fairly overrated outside of Andrew luck
This post was edited on 10/21/10 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:41 pm to fightingtiger89
quote:
We shall have our chance. We play them in the season opener next year at Cowboy Stadium.
talk is cheap.
We will still be wondering when Les will let J lee start when we go to Jerry World to see the Oregon-Nike team in action.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:41 pm to 1p56
was it the fact they're averaging 9 yards a play?
bc thats why i think we'd destroy them
bc thats why i think we'd destroy them
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:41 pm to The Future
Keep in mind, they probably couldnt stop our run. The game might unfold something like this. We power the ball down the field.... their defense is already dead tired by the time we step in the endzone on the first drive. If they go three and out that first drive, snapping the ball every 10 seconds between plays, that dead defense is right back on the field, a fast paced offense can screw you if your playing a good defense, because the LAST thing you want, is your defense to be tired.
Don't quote stats. Tennessee was dominating them until the rain delay. I mean THRASHING them. Then they had an hour to go regroup. Besides, Denard Robinson was the man until he played a ranked defense... the second ranked defense he played dropped him out of the race... the pac 10 and big 12 are infamous for not grasping the concept of defense (minus USC).
Don't quote stats. Tennessee was dominating them until the rain delay. I mean THRASHING them. Then they had an hour to go regroup. Besides, Denard Robinson was the man until he played a ranked defense... the second ranked defense he played dropped him out of the race... the pac 10 and big 12 are infamous for not grasping the concept of defense (minus USC).
This post was edited on 10/21/10 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:43 pm to The Future
quote:
You didn't respond to my schedule post. Quit drinking the ESPN kool-aid. They run what they run and none of the shitty teams they have played have stopped it. The Stanford win is the only one on that list that actually catches my eye, even though Stanford themselves were fairly overrated
LSU, BAma, Auburn, Miami, Ohio ST, Duke, NC, Wisconsin, and Wyoming would beat them by 30. Is that what you want to hear? Do I think they would have 600 yards offense against LSU? No, but Oregon is a damn good football team. You cannot be sane and dispute that.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:43 pm to 1p56
quote:
Let me rephrase. We would dominate them all over the field then pull some shocker escape win out of our butt with a clutch jlee drive at the end.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:44 pm to 1p56
I'm not saying they would lose, but the players are tiny. Our CBs could play on their defensive line.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:44 pm to EricB
quote:
I know many would disagree with this, but you're basically watching WVU man for man, with 1 better reciever and a slightly better offensive line, who doesn't ever seem to get called for holding when its obvious.
Their offense works 50x better than whatever it is that WV is doing though...
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:44 pm to efrad
quote:
Did we really try to?
No, LSU TRIED to keep it close.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:46 pm to nwaLSUfan
quote:
whoever brings up the mcneese game as a point is a fricking dumbass when it comes to the game of football. Yeah i guess we could have blitzed our asses off and shown them all kind of different packages, left ridley in the entire game, and ran up 60+ points on them but how does that help any better than a 22 point victory in which we gave no new film for future opponents to study. If you think we actually played 50% of our potential go play in traffic immediately
If LSU were that good, they woudl have destroyed McNeese without trying. We are talkng McNeese
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:46 pm to BT
quote:
Long as jj plays we aren't destroying anyone
Since you chose to make this thread about our QB, I know for a fact that in the year of the pick six we would not have stood a chance against the Ducks.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:48 pm to Cornholio
quote:
No, but Oregon is a damn good football team. You cannot be sane and dispute that.
I think they're a good football team that thrives on execution and a gimmick offense that could be stopped by a top tier defense, they're one of those teams that will score 100 or 10. See against Boise State last year. They got taken out of their element early and completely shut down. Not using that as a measuring stick for this years team, but to say they're the best team is stretching it, and to say their completely unstoppable is laughable
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:49 pm to LSUTANGERINE
I can't believe you all gave the OP 5 pages worth on this crap.
Posted on 10/21/10 at 9:49 pm to The Future
quote:
a gimmick offense
You keep saying this. Their offense isn't very "gimmicky;" it just constantly creates a mismatch on the LB core of the defense.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News