- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ridley probably going to NFL
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:32 pm to LSUtiger17
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:32 pm to LSUtiger17
quote:
His 40s compared to Pierre Thomas' 40s are equal according to nfldraftscout.com. Plus, Ridley is at least an inch taller and 15-20lbs heavier coming out, assuming he does this year. Care to comment on that?
Yes....sure not a starter. Too slow. He's also not a first round pick. I think he should come back and work on his speed and try to improve his draft status.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:35 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Yes....sure not a starter.
But Pierre Thomas is. And the saints are suffering without him.
quote:
He's also not a first round pick.
No one has said that. I think he'll be a 3-5th rd pick, and be looked at as a steal after 2 years in the league, but that's just my opinion.
This post was edited on 1/8/11 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:37 pm to LSUtiger17
quote:Rule of Thumb: If a kid is a first round pick, declare early. If not, stay in school and try to improve draft status.
I think he'll be a 3-5th rd pick,
Saban's advice to any player. Good advice, IMO.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:38 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
ETA: Also, how did he have a bad game aganst UNC? He ran well that game outside of the fumbles, but he corrected those problems.
he fumbled twice. nuff said
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:39 pm to LSURussian
I hope he comes back too. But that doesn't affect where he goes this year.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:39 pm to LSUtiger17
he doesnt come close to being pierre thomas. horrible comparison.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:43 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
he doesnt come close to being pierre thomas. horrible comparison.
You're right. Ridley ran over 1000 yards while PT only ran for 664. Ridley is bigger and they are equal in 40 times. What else am I missing?
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:44 pm to LSURussian
quote:Reading comprehension is a good skill. Read his post again. It's pointing out FACTS that SR has measurables as good or better than Pierre when he was drafted.Many of these posters have opinions about Ridly's skill set that are just stupid wrong.
LSURussian
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:46 pm to LSUtiger17
quote:That LE is omnipotent...a supreme being that has no need for facts not of his own creation...that's all you missed.
What else am I missing?
This post was edited on 1/8/11 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:51 pm to LSUtiger17
quote:
You're right. Ridley ran over 1000 yards while PT only ran for 664. Ridley is bigger and they are equal in 40 times. What else am I missing?
precisely. you tell me what makes them comparable?
i think you just proved my point.
and ridley hasnt even ran a 40 yet.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:52 pm to OTIS2
quote:Nah....reading it just once already cost me a few IQ points.....
Read his post again.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:52 pm to OTIS2
quote:
It's pointing out FACTS that SR has measurables as good or better than Pierre when he was drafted
pierre thomas wasnt drafted. please go back to f&d board.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:54 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
precisely. you tell me what makes them comparable?
So, from those measurables, you're conceding that Ridley is better?
quote:
and ridley hasnt even ran a 40 yet.
Just going by what nfldraftscout.com has, which has been pretty accurate for the other backs that I have seen.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:56 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Are you that dense? You opined at the start of this thread that Ridley wasn't NFL material. You've waffled since. That post is informing your dumb arse that Pierre, a very talented and successful NFL back, didn't bring to the table what SR has.Damn...you're like reasoning with a stump.
Lester Earl
This post was edited on 1/8/11 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:57 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
pierre thomas wasnt drafted.
We are arguing over whether or not he will play a major role on an NFL team or be a situational player.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 5:58 pm to LSUtiger17
quote:
So, from those measurables, you're conceding that Ridley is better?
nope.
you are the one telling me they are comparable yet everything you are comparing doesn't match up
Pierre Thomas is top 5 in the NFL in terms of balance. He is a stronger runner than RIdley. Better pass catcher.
quote:
Just going by what nfldraftscout.com has, which has been pretty accurate for the other backs that I have seen.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 6:01 pm to OTIS2
quote:
You opined at the start of this thread that Ridley wasn't NFL material. Y
link?
ill quit this board forever if u point out where i said he wasnt NFL material.
i can quote 10 posts in the last few weeks with me saying he has a place in the nfl
This post was edited on 1/8/11 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 1/8/11 at 6:02 pm to Lester Earl
quote:You do realize you're a joke, correct?
Lester Earl
Posted on 1/8/11 at 6:04 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
yet everything you are comparing doesn't match up
No, it doesn't match up to your stupid arse opinions. I, unlike you, am capable of coherent, logical thought.
quote:
He is a stronger runner than RIdley. Better pass catcher.
No.
quote:
What are you're resources regarding 40 times? Don't say he got ran down by a D1 interior lineman, because that's when the edge was already taken. This argument is utter bullshite. Please bring something to the damn table.
Posted on 1/8/11 at 6:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Only 'Rag in this thread has said Ridley is not NFL material. Some people are just stupid blind in their loyalty. They read things that are not written.
You opined at the start of this thread that Ridley wasn't NFL material. Y
link?
ill quit this board forever if u point out where i said he wasnt NFL material.
Popular
Back to top


2


