- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:33 pm to arrakis
quote:Holy frick. If you have some insight as to why Doc is wrong please enlighten us.
Only ignorant fans who don't know the rules of the game.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:33 pm to drexyl
quote:
Holy frick. If you have some insight as to why Doc is wrong please enlighten us.
well if the ball is knocked out blah blah blah
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:33 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Now show me in absolutes where he doesn't have possession.
I'll be waiting.
A single frame is not enough to determine. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of the game knows that. By the time he HAS demonstrated possession, the key is his right foot. If it was inbounds, it's a reception. If not, it's incomplete.
However, by your definition, a reception is an instantaneous event, not a process.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:33 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Arrakis just wants to start shite in life
Fixed it for you.
No matter what picture you picked he's going to twist it to benefit his arguement. Surprised he didn't tell you it's a still pic and doesn't show anything. That's what he said when this pic was posted last year.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:34 pm to TigerBait1127
I get it.
He tells someone else to provide evidence, and when the evidence proves his point wrong, he starts talking about "ifs".
He tells someone else to provide evidence, and when the evidence proves his point wrong, he starts talking about "ifs".
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:35 pm to arrakis
quote:
A single frame is not enough to determine. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of the game knows that.
Nevermind, he posted what I told you he would say while I was posting.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:35 pm to arrakis
quote:
However, by your definition, a reception is an instantaneous event, not a process.
if julio had made the same exact catch if would have been a completion in the eyes of the booth review.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:37 pm to JJ27
quote:
Nevermind, he posted what I told you he would say while I was posting
yep
just let this thread be a lesson to anyone who trys to argue ANYTHING with arrakis on ANY topic.
He's always right. No Matter what.
Even if he is wrong.
Which he always is.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:38 pm to TheDoc
quote:
if julio had made the same exact catch if would have been a completion in the eyes of the booth review.
...speaking of "if's"
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:38 pm to arrakis
quote:
By the time he HAS demonstrated possession, the key is his right foot. If it was inbounds, it's a reception. If not, it's incomplete.
possession isn't made until he has 1 foot down while maintaining control of the football, which anyone with a pulse can see that he did.
Show me evidence that shows him losing control of the football
quote:
However, by your definition, a reception is an instantaneous event, not a process.
where did TheDoc say that?
This post was edited on 3/20/10 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:41 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
possession isn't made until he has 1 foot down while maintaining control of the football, which anyone with a pulse can see that he did.
Again, that's the key. Contrary to TheDoc's ignorance, it's a process. On that play, his right foot determines whether it's a completion, not his left foot that people have been focusing on.
However, I've got his definition locked and loaded for next year.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:42 pm to arrakis
quote:
.speaking of "if's"
Just following your lead
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:42 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Show me evidence that shows him losing control of the football
He can't.
He keeps avoiding this question.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:43 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
where did TheDoc say that?
You don't read well.....
quote:
hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:44 pm to arrakis
Show me evidence that shows him losing control of the football
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:48 pm to arrakis
quote:
However, by your definition, a reception is an instantaneous event, not a process.
quote:
hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds
once again, where did he say it was an instantaneous event?
he has clear control of the football with a foot inbounds is all he said (btw, that equals possession)
This post was edited on 3/20/10 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:48 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Show me evidence that shows him losing control of the football
There's no indisputable evidence that his right foot was inbounds when it came down. Therefore, the call on the field had to stand.
Nobody has posted a picture or video that shows "green" between his right foot and the sideline when it touched the ground.
If you have one, I'd love to see it.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:49 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
once again, where did he say it was an instantaneous event?
Go back and read the thread....if you have the reading skills.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:49 pm to arrakis
quote:
There's no indisputable evidence that his right foot was inbounds when it came down.
he had 2 feet inbounds
if 1 foot is down it is a catch. He has at least 1 foot down + control of the ball
This post was edited on 3/20/10 at 1:50 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News