Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Weekly Coaching Malpractice Example #405802903 - Allowing The Opponent Double Possessions | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Weekly Coaching Malpractice Example #405802903 - Allowing The Opponent Double Possessions

Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3067 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Yeah OP is wrong on the coin toss, but definitely right to talk about he mgmt of the possession after the turnover. Terribile playcalling and the lack of effort or foresight to try and bleed the clock out to prevent Vandy from getting another possession was ridiculous and simple clock management stuff


TY...

JFC this is the point even in the damn title of the OP
Posted by tigerbaiter1033
USA
Member since Nov 2011
2476 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

You are trying too hard to find something to complain about. There's tons of legitimate things to complain about.


As it happened in real-time, everyone I was watching with was complaining about it. Sure enough it came back to bite us. That was losing football strategy right there. Clearly, you've never known or have forgotten what that looks like
Posted by Kool Kaliper
Mansfield, TX
Member since Nov 2018
3337 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:19 pm to
Brian Kelly acts like he’s smarter than LSU fans and above the program. His arrogant press conferences and the disorganized mess we see on the field every Saturday show exactly how little respect he has for the fanbase. He knows his massive contract makes him untouchable, so he keeps insulting the fans without any fear of consequences.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62536 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


As it happened in real-time, everyone I was watching with was complaining about it.


Everyone you were watching the game with were just whining about a negative situation.

We played it to use as much time as possible. We ran the ball on first down and then got a first down on a pass to move the ball to the Vandy 23 with about a minute left.

Now, every reasonable person in the world is thinking TD there. But, using time is still valuable. What did LSU do? They ran it AGAIN. The problem is that it lost 2 yards and Vandy used it's timeout. If you ran it 2 more times, you don't use any more time because Vandy uses its timeouts. Plus, you'd give up your primary objective of putting it in the end zone.

You are just complaining about a negative result.


quote:

That was losing football strategy right there. Clearly, you've never known or have forgotten what that looks like


I'd love for you to be explicit about what playcalls you hated in that sequence and what you wish had been done.


This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 1:31 pm
Posted by yaherrdme
The Place to Be
Member since Feb 2004
5915 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

That FG changed the entire complexion of the game


Not being prepared (again) and getting out coached (again) was the whole complexion of the game and it never changed from the opening kickoff to the kneel down to end it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62536 posts
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Now to the main point of the OP, coaches allowing double possessions when we don't have to



Can you be specific about what you wanted LSU to have done differently?

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram