- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Wade and What we really know:
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:56 am to Dellybelly82
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:56 am to Dellybelly82
quote:
I’m sick and tired about hearing will wade rumors, it’s basketball, who gives a shite. Since when did LSU start caring about peanuts. Football season is slowly approaching.
A lot of sense you do make. August can't get here soon enough.
0
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:57 am to Lester Earl
Book is full of shite FWIW
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:58 am to Macavity92
No. Just no on your hearsay analysis. A statement against interest must be a statement by that person. So someone else saying that Wade said something against his interest doesn't count. If Wade were on tape saying that, then that tape would be admissible despite the fact that it is a statement made outside of the courtroom because it is a witnesses own statement against his interest.
Also, a statement against interest exception typically only applies when the witness is unavailable. Will Wade is available to testify, the judge simply found that his testimony is irrelevant and therefore inadmissible.
Also, a statement against interest exception typically only applies when the witness is unavailable. Will Wade is available to testify, the judge simply found that his testimony is irrelevant and therefore inadmissible.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:58 am to S
quote:indubitably
Book is full of shite FWIW
Posted on 4/30/19 at 9:59 am to kftiger1
ANNND...what happens when Wade refuses to acknowledge making that statement?
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:00 am to Lester Earl
quote:
caught
That word you keep using
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:00 am to S
What’s his motive tho to even talk about that?
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:03 am to Macavity92
Testifying about what someone else said is hearsay dude
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:08 am to tigerpimpbot
He’s been caught on wire tap twice. Makes the 3rd accusation a lot more likely.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:08 am to nitwit
quote:
ANNND...what happens when Wade refuses to acknowledge making that statement?
You're not going to like this but the answer is, nothing.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:08 am to Lester Earl
The tapezzzz
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:11 am to Lester Earl
He’s done as a D1 coach so probably just trying to take ppl down with him. Who knows. If his story was true, why not take the LSU job and get a raise instead of “going broke” paying AZ recruits?
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:12 am to Macavity92
quote:
Hearsay is inadmissible. Obviously, it was admitted
It was admitted because what he said about Wade wasn’t being admitted for the truth of whether or not Wade did, in fact, make the offer. What was admitted was Richardson’s statement. What Wade may or may not have said to Rivhardson wasn’t the issue before the Court. What Richardson himself made was.
quote:
As to Wade this would be considered an admission against interest, would be fully admissible in a court of law and could be considered by a judge or jury in determining what Wade did.
If Wade were a party to the case, this would apply, but he is not
quote:
I did not realize the NCAA applied a presumption of innocence. I did not realize they needed proof beyond a reasonable doubt. I did not realize they were bound by rules of evidence.
The NCAA’s burden, per their bylaws, is very similar to clear and convincing evidence in a court of law
This post was edited on 4/30/19 at 10:15 am
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:14 am to S
Would be a weird thing to lie about imo.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:17 am to LSUgrad1998
In my very simple mind, someone is out to get WW for some reason.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:22 am to Lester Earl
quote:
@DanWetzel
Wild day in federal court. Ex Arizona assistant Book Richardson, on recorded tape, basically says despite making nearly $250,000 a year he was “broke” from using so much of own money to pay recruits. Hyperbole, sure, but still.
Reliable witness is reliable
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:22 am to kftiger1
Yeah.
No. The statements by Wade in a proceeding against Wade (or LSU) are not hearsay at all under Art. 801 D.
No. The statements by Wade in a proceeding against Wade (or LSU) are not hearsay at all under Art. 801 D.
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:24 am to Lester Earl
quote:
isn’t caught 3x in 1 year
You’ve played your annoying contrarian schtick so much that you’re now just making shite up and being a douche
I’m not avoiding the elephant in the room, but what has Wade been caught with?
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:24 am to tigerpimpbot
Again what’s his motive to even bringing Wade up
Posted on 4/30/19 at 10:25 am to Lester Earl
I don't think we will never know since Book isn't subject to cross examination.
This post was edited on 4/30/19 at 10:27 am
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News