Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Would acquiring Levitt actually be better than Sorsby? | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Would acquiring Levitt actually be better than Sorsby?

Posted on 1/6/26 at 6:25 am to
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
34838 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 6:25 am to
Well know after next season
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
18272 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 6:26 am to
Not in my opinion but he's one of the higher ranked QB's available, but also take a shot at the next Chambliss - a relative unknown from a smaller school and let it play out.

I wonder had the Ole Miss starter not gotten hurt how their season might have gone - they almost lost to Kentucky with him starting - would it have taken a loss before the Georgia game for Kiffin to have made the change if the starter had not gotten injured?
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 6:34 am
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56911 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 6:31 am to
Leavitt, Simmons and Holstein

One of them should be able to complete a pass more than 17 yards in the air
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
13135 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 7:11 am to
If healthy then yes Levitt is the better option because he is a better passer especially down the field. However, that injury is a question mark so time will tell.
Posted by QB
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2013
8162 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:23 am to
but if he doesn't, he is the worst
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14971 posts
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:25 am to
There won't be a spring for him to practice, but I think he fits the Jaxon Dart mold for Kiffin's offense better than Sorsby.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram