Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Exxon is in the $63 range ** back on topic | Page 5 | Money Talk
Started By
Message

re: Exxon is in the $63 range ** back on topic

Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:08 pm to
After reading this next page of the Zilla/Russian pissing match, I see what Russian is trying to say. However, he is making his point in a terrible manner.

Penny stocks are a dangerous game that don't perform as well (on average) as the big board stocks. We have all heard that over and over again, and I agree with you. However, to say that dollar value gains are more important than percentages is ludicrous.

I think what you are trying to say is that sustainable growth is better than volatility plays.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26725 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:12 pm to
Zilla, to answer your question, no I did not. I got into Exxon though at 64.90 which I feel was a great entry if you look at the huge correction it made over a few month period.

Plus, according to Russian, since I am up ~60 cents and you are up only 7 cents, I am THAT much better than you.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

There's no way you are that dense.
Oh yes I am!!!!

I tried doing what Z is doing now. I did it for years. I enjoyed telling people how much my little cheap stocks were up percentage wise. But when I looked at the balance of my portfolio, it never seemed to go up all that much.

Plus with many of those 'penny' stocks, like MVIS, in order to buy enough shares to make any money on the small $ increases, it was difficult to do without moving the price for the stock. Both on the up (buy) side and the down (sell) side. If you enter an order for 40,000 shares, either buy or sell, the market moves. They are just too thinly traded.

So I switched to going after larger $ increases with more widely held stocks. My portfolio has done much better, thank you very much.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

However, to say that dollar value gains are more important than percentages is ludicrous.
Only if you assume you have the same $ amount invested in either type of stock. The penny stock buyers I've known just don't put that much concentration into any single bottom-fishing equity holding. Too much risk.

Plus, please see my post above about moving the market with any significant quantity of buy or sell orders.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I tried doing what Z is doing now. I did it for years. I enjoyed telling people how much my little cheap stocks were up percentage wise. But when I looked at the balance of my portfolio, it never seemed to go up all that much.

Plus with many of those 'penny' stocks, like MVIS, in order to buy enough shares to make any money on the small $ increases, it was difficult to do without moving the price for the stock. Both on the up (buy) side and the down (sell) side. If you enter an order for 40,000 shares, either buy or sell, the market moves. They are just too thinly traded.

So I switched to going after larger $ increases with more widely held stocks. My portfolio has done much better, thank you very much.


Yeah, I figured out that's what you were talking about. See my second post.

While I do think you are right, It does seem as though you are just here to piss on the guys parade. Whether it's wrong or right is up for debate.

Not all of us have enough money to buy into the big boards. I only have a few thousand dollars in my investment account right now, so if I buy 100 shares in Exxon, I'm almost 100% committed to the one stock.

Since we can't buy a ton of shares, our relative transaction costs are much higher, so we must seek a higher return in order to make it worth our time and money (fees).

I think every investor gets lured in by the penny stocks at first. They are sexy and fun to follow. Eventually, we realize that it's just not right for big time investing.

I guess what I'm saying is: Even though we are wrong, let us have our fun. Ignorance is bliss.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

It does seem as though you are just here to piss on the guys parade.
Today IS Mardi Gras.....

quote:

Not all of us have enough money to buy into the big boards.
Which is exactly why I said Z and I have different investment philosophies and objectives earlier in this thread.

quote:

I think every investor gets lured in by the penny stocks at first. They are sexy and fun to follow. Eventually, we realize that it's just not right for big time investing.
Agreed.

quote:

Even though we are wrong, let us have our fun.
Go for it!!


quote:

Ignorance is bliss.
Which is why I'm so happy....

ETA: MVIS is down 3% now. Thank goodness it's only eight cents! How's THAT for pissing on a parade???
This post was edited on 2/16/10 at 12:46 pm
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

LSURussian




Maybe one day we can be rich like you.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26725 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

It does seem as though you are just here to piss on the guys parade.

Today IS Mardi Gras.....




Russian did you buy-in XOM at all recently, during the energy stock correction (which I think is over). I know you said it's by far the largest of your investments, but from a swing-trade perspective, I think the current upside is WAY higher than downside. But I am biased as hell.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Russian did you buy-in XOM at all recently
I put in an order last week but the price kept running away from my limit orders so they never filled.

quote:

I think the current upside is WAY higher than downside.
I do, too. Every time I think about selling some XOM in order to diversify a bit, Exxon does something to change my mind.....like raising its dividend, AGAIN.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 1:26 pm to
I just bought some. I'm tired of watching my account sit completely liquid.

I should probably change the password on my account and forget what it is.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I just bought some.
Some what? XOM or MVIS?


(Fingers crossed it's XOM.)
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Fingers crossed it's XOM


Yeah, it is.

I got no MVIS in my real account, but I have a good chunk in my school project account.
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I think what you are trying to say is that sustainable growth is better than volatility plays.


he was WAY to specific to mean that....well, he might mean that now
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Only if you assume you have the same $ amount invested in either type of stock.


why would you ASSume anything otherwise ???
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:33 pm to
when you make your victory speech in front of your class, give Zilla a shout out !....wait, when is the project over ?
This post was edited on 2/16/10 at 2:34 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Yeah, it is.
You're doing well today then. Up almost a buck-fifty a share.

quote:

I got no MVIS in my real account, but I have a good chunk in my school project account.
I hope you don't have any of this other stock Z pumped last August.

RTK

It's only down about 60% since then.
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

RTK


did you notice the thread title ?

C O M P A N Y

it was pretty obvious to stay from the stock by the time I posted about the company..... might be a good buy right now though !

actually, again, you had an opporunity to make a LOT of $ AFTER my post
This post was edited on 2/16/10 at 2:40 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

why would you ASSume anything otherwise ???
I've answered that in subsequent posts.

Buy $80,000 worth of MVIS and then try to sell it and see what it does to the price both times. Then buy $80,000 worth of CMI and see what happens to the price....NOTHING.

BTW, CMI is up $2.45/share today, or 4.5%. I still like my method better......
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134091 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

it was pretty obvious to stay from the stock by the time I posted about the company
Really? Is that why you posted this 12 hours later after your OP?:
quote:

the more digging I do , the more I like this, not to mention the insane stock volume/price increases
Of course, that made it obvious you thought it was not a good stock to buy then....

Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/16/10 at 3:24 pm to
Can the OP change the title of this thread to the Zilla and Russian Pissing match?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram